Homesteading Forum banner

What is ANTIFA?

6 reading
1.2K views 78 replies 16 participants last post by  HDRider  
#1 ·

Antifa is a militarist, anarchist enterprise that explicitly calls for the overthrow of the United States Government, law enforcement authorities, and our system of law.​
Because of the aforementioned pattern of political violence designed to suppress lawful political activity and obstruct the rule of law, I hereby designate Antifa as a “domestic terrorist organization.”​
 
#44 ·
Let's do some simple math.

Antifa Anti-Ice Rhetoric + ICE Assignation = Terror Organization
 
#50 ·
An earlier Texas ICE shooting

August 17, 2025 - The attack on the Prairieland facility stands out for the use of firearms against federal officers and for the alleged perpetrators: The Post’s examination of the case found that the purported attackers were among a secretive network of Dallas anti-fascists, part of a growing movement of far-left political resistance that some experts say has shown signs of increasing in violence in the Trump era.​
authorities arrested Benjamin Song, 32, a Marine-reservist-turned-anti-fascist activist, and charged him with firing one of the weapons recovered at the scene.​
Song was offering military training to a group of anti-fascist activists, some of them transgender people, who were eager to learn the hand-to-hand combat and gun-handling skills displayed by right-wing groups during the nationwide unrest in 2020, according to three people close to Song.​
 
#53 ·
"In 1943, the following directive was issued from party headquarters to all communists in the United States. It read:"

"When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them after suitable build-ups as fascist or Nazi or anti-Semitic and use the prestige of anti-fascist and tolerance organizations to discredit them. In the public mind, constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell. Association will, after enough repetition, become fact in the public."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kiamichi Kid
#54 ·
AI Overview



The quote, which describes a propaganda technique involving labeling opponents as "fascist," "Nazi," or "anti-Semitic," has been widely attributed to a fabricated "Communist Party directive from 1943"
. There is no evidence that this directive was authentic.
Here is what is known about the quote's origin:
  • Fabricated source: The quote, often with very similar wording, has been repeated and attributed to a supposed 1943 Communist directive.
  • "Expert" attribution: In 1943, Oliver Carlson, a former communist, testified before the California Legislature and shared wording similar to the quote, attributing it to the Communist Party.
  • Further amplification: The quote gained wider circulation through publications like the 1953 book Handbook on Propaganda for the Alert Citizen by Oliver Carlson and the 1956 House Committee on Un-American Activities report Soviet Total War.
  • Lack of corroboration: Researchers at the Library of Congress and specialists in Soviet affairs have been unable to find any evidence that such a directive was ever issued by the Communist Party.
The quote in context
While the quote itself is not from an authentic directive, the strategy it describes—associating opponents with heavily stigmatized labels to discredit them—has a long history, particularly in the mid-20th century.
  • Cold War tactics: During the Cold War, both the Soviet Union and the U.S. used such language. The Soviet Union and its allies frequently used "fascist" to describe opponents and dissenters, while American anti-communists often labeled the Soviet Union as a fascist state to justify aggressive policies.
  • Weimar Germany: Even before the Cold War, Germany's Communist Party (KPD) was led by hardline Stalinists who broadly applied the term "fascist" to their political opponents. They notoriously labeled the center-left Social Democratic Party as "social fascists".
  • Name-calling as propaganda: The use of negative labels to discredit opponents is a well-established propaganda technique known as "name-calling." This strategy attaches a negative label to a person or idea to provoke a negative emotional response in the audience.
 
#63 ·
Your simple math does not add up. Detainees, not ICE officials, appear to be the target as reported so far.
Why? Because he was a poor shot?

Maybe waiting for more information would be helpful or are you trying to add in your own ANTIFA rhetoric.
FBI: Dallas Sniper Who Attacked ICE Facility had 'Anti-ICE' 'Ideological Motive'

FBI Director Kash Patel reported that the man who shot at an ICE facility in Dallas on Wednesday morning had an “idealogical {sic} motive.” At least one of the bullets loaded in a clip had “Anti-ICE” marked on the shell casing.
 
#67 ·
For some of us, chaos and destruction are the only activities in which we experience life as liberated creativity. Our desire to destroy what destroys us is an artform that can’t be bought by better wages or government reforms. We don’t need the divinity or guidance of a new future, a progressive politician, or an organization.

With the ammunition of love and rage, we reclaim our lives with every momentary rupture against a world that can never be voted away.

We invite all anarchists across the country not only to occupy and disrupt operations at ICE facilities in every city, but to celebrate life with fire against the death march of american law and order. With tactical diversity, lets meet in the streets and wage a carnival of war against ICE and all authority!
 
  • Like
Reactions: JeffreyD
#69 ·
Im telling you guys, stop the flow of psychiatric meds and this all goes away. 50 years ago these people would all be locked safely away. Tied to a chair and drooling like Joe Biden after jello night.
The meds till the richest soil. The seeds are planted by those farming a revolution.

Only the craziest of the crazies become shooters, but the streets are filling with the hordes whose seeds have sprouted.
 
#72 ·
Just in case you don't like clicking an X link -

Xxx leaders are 100% to blame for recent violence against Yyys.​
The individuals who commit the violent acts have to take the legal consequences alone, as that is our system, and no other system would work. But none of them cooked up their opinions on their own. Even if they were brainwashed by peers, the peers got it from the "news" and xxx leaders.​
Complex actions don't happen without ideas, and ideas arrive in the form of words. Nnn and Hhh and the other loathsome Xxx leaders created our dangerous situation with words (Nazi, etc.), and they are obviously aware of their actions.​
So far, the leadership of the Yyy has not responded in kind, probably because of moral and ethical limits. Let's hope it stays that way. The Xxx party is in full collapse, so I expect more violence as their last resort.​