[VA Susan]

Dr. Krüger, MD, is a pathologist who specializes in diseases of the breast. Her lecture concerned changes in breast cancer cases following introduction of Spike generating genetic drug therapy. :

Report 61: Ute Krüger, MD, Breast Cancer Specialist, Reveals Increase in Cancers and Occurrences of "Turbo Cancers" Following Genetic Therapy "Vaccines"

Ute Krüger, MD, Breast Cancer Specialist, Reveals Increases in Cancers and Occurrences of "Turbo Cancers" Following Genetic Therapies Being

dailyclout.io

Dr. Cole, a Pathologist makes the same observations:

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1620568783428493314/pu/vid/542x270/iwQaRyHXDsXrcwtL.mp4?tag=14

 

[Hiro]

Others have alluded to this recently more directly than I have. It is impossible to govern a population that yearns to be free if there is no trust in any authority. That trust, once lost, is nearly impossible to restore when the same people are in authority or those proven to be liars and of evil intent are not held to account.

 

[VA Susan]

Others have alluded to this recently more directly than I have. It is impossible to govern a population that yearns to be free if there is no trust in any authority. That trust, once lost, is nearly impossible to restore when the same people are in authority or those proven to be liars and of evil intent are not held to account.

They will face the Righteous Judge one day and will give account for their lawless deeds!

 

[Alice In TX/MO]

We need to charge Faucci with treason now and hang him. He can meet his maker after that.

 

[doc-]

I read "Report 61" cited by the OP...It represents largely her impressions and a few anecdotal cases without the detailed methods, data and analysis required to evaluate its credibiity. I hold her postion suspect particularly due to one comment in the article-- "I was DISAPPOINTED because I could not find any trend in the number of cases, the average age of the patients and the average tumor size."...The emboldened words indicate a prejudicial POV-- simply not acceptable in scientific research.

Her observation deserve further investigation, but should be done by legitiamte scientists, not people with a degree and an agenda. She may or may not be right, but with only three yr's worth of data, it's very difficult mathematically to attribute small changes to "a trend," particulalry when "shutdowns" affected the pattern of pts' seeking medical care. It may be analogous to the Baby Boom after WWII-- that wasn't due to a change in human reproductive ability, just the timing of things.

 

[GTX63]

We need to charge Faucci with treason now and hang him. He can meet his maker after that.

The episodes between Fauci and Rand Paul and "if you don't believe me, you don't believe the science", the pictures of himself across his office sort of set the tone. His smugness with zero concern for accountability or consequence should be telling to everyone how different the standards are for people like us and those within the circle.
I'm not much for texas sleigh rides but I'm starting to come around.

 

[Danaus29]

I read "Report 61" cited by the OP...It represents largely her impressions and a few anecdotal cases without the detailed methods, data and analysis required to evaluate its credibiity. I hold her postion suspect particularly due to one comment in the article-- "I was DISAPPOINTED because I could not find any trend in the number of cases, the average age of the patients and the average tumor size."...The emboldened words indicate a prejudicial POV-- simply not acceptable in scientific research.

Her observation deserve further investigation, but should be done by legitiamte scientists, not people with a degree and an agenda. She may or may not be right, but with only three yr's worth of data, it's very difficult mathematically to attribute small changes to "a trend," particulalry when "shutdowns" affected the pattern of pts' seeking medical care. It may be analogous to the Baby Boom after WWII-- that wasn't due to a change in human reproductive ability, just the timing of things.

Unfortunately that is the latest trend in scientific methodology, one which was used during the vaccine trials.

 

[VA Susan]

Regarding the Defense Medical Epidemiological Database Data Dump

Database artifact, smoking gun, or something in between?

rwmalonemd.substack.com

"Total Number of Neoplasms for Breast Cancer By Year up 469% " Data from the military recorded by physicians before the DOD "found five years of data errors" and then changed their numbers!
Graph on pulmonary Embolism as an example of their "editing" from Steve Kirsch's site: DMED data is explosive. Mainstream media has been ordered to ignore it.
He happened to do a story on pulmonary embolism before so had the previous graph.

 

[doc-]

^^^
"Some people complain that the glass is half empty...."

Which graph is right?...Maybe they legitimately caught errors in the data collection and corrected it....OTOH, we do know that ther govt is unjustifiabley changing numbers on climate data to fit the narrative...

The other problem with the graphs presented above is that it's DOD numbers, presumabley related to military personnel-- young health people, and a relatively small sample size....CDC says there are 100,000 DEATHS from PTE yearly, so the toal number of PTEs is probabley in the millions, of not 10s of millions, not just 3000....With smaller sample sizes, larger swings in the data are more common just by chance.

You prresent an interesting point, but by itself it is not condemning.

 

[VA Susan]

^^^
"Some people complain that the glass is half empty...."

Which graph is right?...Maybe they legitimately caught errors in the data collection and corrected it....OTOH, we do know that ther govt is unjustifiabley changing numbers on climate data to fit the narrative...

The other problem with the graphs presented above is that it's DOD numbers, presumabley related to military personnel-- young health people, and a relatively small sample size....CDC says there are 100,000 DEATHS from PTE yearly, so the toal number of PTEs is probabley in the millions, of not 10s of millions, not just 3000....With smaller sample sizes, larger swings in the data are more common just by chance.

You prresent an interesting point, but by itself it is not condemning.

Hi Doc,
Our government does not have a very good track record about telling the truth so my bet is that they lied and covered up the truth.

The issue of immune system damage has been mentioned since the beginning of the shot roll out by concerned Doctors. My mother in law who never before had skin cancer is having places removed constantly (basal cell) since having her many jabs. My father who has been on Gleevac for 14 years after his stomach was removed due to stomach cancer now has tumors growing on his liver that were spots 14 yrs ago. The Gleevac was either shrinking them or slowing their growth. They are growing to such a degree now that they are expected to double by June. Another lady in my former church who had breast cancer that metastasized to her bones now has more tumors and all her old tumors have become active. Maybe a coincidence but who knows?

Starting at the middle of the article below:
One of Europe’s best-known figures in medical research is Dr Michel Goldman, professor of immunology and pharmacotherapy at the Université Libre de Bruxelles in Belgium. Dr Goldman has gone public with his own personal story of an accelerated cancer which he associates with Covid-19 “vaccination”. He was diagnosed with T-cell lymphoma, an immune system cancer, sometime after receiving his second Covid-19 inoculation. Immediately after the diagnosis he rushed to get a third inoculation, believing it was indicated due to immune suppression caused by his cancer.
Within days of this injection being administered, Dr Goldman’s condition worsened and tests showed a rapid proliferation of the cancer. He and his brother, a nuclear medicine specialist, have written a case study encouraging further medical research into the suspected connection between mRNA “vaccines” and T cell lymphoma. Read more here, and hear his story here.

An Accelerated Cancer Catastrophe | NZ Doctors Speaking Out With Science

Another outspoken pathologist, Dr Ryan Cole, was one of the first to detect the accelerated cancer rates which have been observed since the Covid-19 vaccine

nzdsos.com

Also in the Atlantic. Did a Famous Doctor’s COVID Shot Make His Cancer Worse?

 

[JRHill02]

I would like to examine participants for only scientific reasons. Trust me.

 

[JRHill02]

Seriously, when someone visits and are seated, we let the Catahoulas out one by one. The guest is accepted then but... The dogs, separately have to smell the visitor's breath. Of course some people are freaked out by this but I didn't teach the practice. Do you know how accurate the dogs are at detecting someone who is sick?

Of course they smell a wound. But they can smell a bruise. They can tell you that you have a cold coming on before you know it.

Seems weird but I first learned it by just watching. I learned by experience that these critters can smell or sense something wrong before you know it.

Of they detect, they want to 'wash' your face or hands. They will sit on your feet.

Yeah, it's unusual but I have come to respect it. They are unusually accurate.

 

[doc-]

double post/computer hiccup

 

[doc-]

Hi Doc,
Our government does not have a very good track record about telling the truth so my bet is that they lied and covered up the truth.

The issue of immune system damage has been mentioned since the beginning of the shot roll out by concerned Doctors. My mother in law who never before had skin cancer is having places removed constantly (basal cell) since having her many jabs. My father who has been on Gleevac for 14 years after his stomach was removed due to stomach cancer now has tumors growing on his liver that were spots 14 yrs ago. The Gleevac was either shrinking them or slowing their growth. They are growing to such a degree now that they are expected to double by June. Another lady in my former church who had breast cancer that metastasized to her bones now has more tumors and all her old tumors have become active. Maybe a coincidence but who knows?

Starting at the middle of the article below:
One of Europe’s best-known figures in medical research is Dr Michel Goldman, professor of immunology and pharmacotherapy at the Université Libre de Bruxelles in Belgium. Dr Goldman has gone public with his own personal story of an accelerated cancer which he associates with Covid-19 “vaccination”. He was diagnosed with T-cell lymphoma, an immune system cancer, sometime after receiving his second Covid-19 inoculation. Immediately after the diagnosis he rushed to get a third inoculation, believing it was indicated due to immune suppression caused by his cancer.
Within days of this injection being administered, Dr Goldman’s condition worsened and tests showed a rapid proliferation of the cancer. He and his brother, a nuclear medicine specialist, have written a case study encouraging further medical research into the suspected connection between mRNA “vaccines” and T cell lymphoma. Read more here, and hear his story here.

An Accelerated Cancer Catastrophe | NZ Doctors Speaking Out With Science

Another outspoken pathologist, Dr Ryan Cole, was one of the first to detect the accelerated cancer rates which have been observed since the Covid-19 vaccine

nzdsos.com

Also in the Atlantic. Did a Famous Doctor’s COVID Shot Make His Cancer Worse?

All the anecdotal examples of ca's that appeared or accellerated can be attributed to mere coincidence. It happens all the time, with or without any vax...A vax does not "impair" the immne system. It recruits it to do its duty. The concept that the vax has caused those sorts of problems would be more credible if they could come up with a mechanism to explain it...but they cqn't....BTW-- your Dr.Goldman is pepeating a common misconception-- Those with an impaired immune system can't properly benefit from a vax because they have an impaired immune system. A vax is less likely to work for them.

BTW- I'm not vaxxed....Artificial things like that merely causes a weakening of the gene pool. The vaxxed may survive this go 'round, but may be less able to survive the next-- particularly true for this mRNA vax which is only directed against one antigen, not the multiple antigens of natural immunity.

 

[doc-]

Seems weird but I first learned it by just watching. I learned by experience that these critters can smell or sense something wrong before you know it.

Easily explained-- Illneess often causes a change in levels of certain chemiclas in your blood, sweat, urine etc. (Eg- cardiac or liver enzyme levels go up when there's organ damage.) Dogs can smell that. They can smell as accurately as we can see.

 

[Pony]

All the anecdotal examples of ca's that appeared or accellerated can be attributed to mere coincidence. It happens all the time, with or without any vax...A vax does not "impair" the immne system. It recruits it to do its duty. The concept that the vax has caused those sorts of problems would be more credible if they could come up with a mechanism to explain it...but they cqn't....BTW-- your Dr.Goldman is pepeating a common misconception-- Those with an impaired immune system can't properly benefit from a vax because they have an impaired immune system. A vax is less likely to work for them.

BTW- I'm not vaxxed....Artificial things like that merely causes a weakening of the gene pool. The vaxxed may survive this go 'round, but may be less able to survive the next-- particularly true for this mRNA vax which is only directed against one antigen, not the multiple antigens of natural immunity.

It seems to me that you are out of hand rejecting the idea that the gene therapy injections cause damage, based on govt data.

Is that an accurate observation?

 

[doc-]

It seems to me that you are out of hand rejecting the idea that the gene therapy injections cause damage, based on govt data.

Is that an accurate observation?

No...First, define "damage."....It's well documented that the CoV vax has in increased risk of abnormal clotting-- but not as bad as the risk with the infection itself....Increased risk of ca? I'm not sure the data shows that. Some studies suggest it, but it's hard to evaluate due to the change in med visits during the shut-down and th eoroblem of a short time course for observations.....Continued, unbiased observations need to be accumulated.

 

[VA Susan]

All the anecdotal examples of ca's that appeared or accellerated can be attributed to mere coincidence. It happens all the time, with or without any vax...A vax does not "impair" the immne system. It recruits it to do its duty. The concept that the vax has caused those sorts of problems would be more credible if they could come up with a mechanism to explain it...but they cqn't....BTW-- your Dr.Goldman is pepeating a common misconception-- Those with an impaired immune system can't properly benefit from a vax because they have an impaired immune system. A vax is less likely to work for them.

BTW- I'm not vaxxed....Artificial things like that merely causes a weakening of the gene pool. The vaxxed may survive this go 'round, but may be less able to survive the next-- particularly true for this mRNA vax which is only directed against one antigen, not the multiple antigens of natural immunity.

Dr. Ryan Cole, a Pathologist says that this needs to be investigated:
See 34:12 about cancers.

 

[doc-]

Dr. Ryan Cole, a Pathologist says that this needs to be investigated:
See 34:12 about cancers.

Fine ...That's what science is all about-- make observations, form an hypothesis. Test the hypothesis, then refine the hypothesis and test again. Da capo.

My point is that none of the studies reported are definitive, and may well be inaccurate due to confounding variables and obvious bias at this point. Further more, I can't thinl of a mechanism by which vax leads to cancer is even plausable. An augmented immune system theoretically should inhibit cancer growth. Cf- lower cancer rates in those who've received BCG vax.

 

[VA Susan]

Fine ...That's what science is all about-- make observations, form an hypothesis. Test the hypothesis, then refine the hypothesis and test again. Da capo.

My point is that none of the studies reported are definitive, and may well be inaccurate due to confounding variables and obvious bias at this point. Further more, I can't thinl of a mechanism by which vax leads to cancer is even plausable. An augmented immune system theoretically should inhibit cancer growth. Cf- lower cancer rates in those who've received BCG vax.

It might be good to listen to what the Pathologist has to say before discounting his observations.