The most rural states are...

Discussion in 'Countryside Families' started by ajaxlucy, Feb 24, 2007.

  1. ajaxlucy

    ajaxlucy Well-Known Member Supporter

    Messages:
    3,799
    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2004
    Location:
    Indiana
    I heard this on a quiz show today.

    The most rural state in the U.S., as defined by having the highest percentage of the population living outside of towns and cities, is...(it was a multiple choice question, and the choices were South Dakota, Vermont, or Montana)...

    Vermont!

    Second most rural state is Maine.

    I thought it must be a western state, but I was wrong. Aren't you surprised?
     
  2. veggrower

    veggrower Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    540
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2007
    Location:
    Willamette Valley, Or
    Very!

    If the definition were based more on population/sq mile I am sure it would have been in the West. I grew up in the 2nd largest county in Oregon in area, 2nd smallest in population. The county itself covered more area than some Eastern states. Many western states have counties bigger than, whole states in the east. Those counties are usually very rural.
     

  3. bugstabber

    bugstabber Chief cook & weed puller Supporter

    Messages:
    5,602
    Joined:
    May 12, 2002
    Location:
    South Dakota
    I'm not surprised. Sioux Falls is big and growing, Rapid City too. Most people work in town to make a living.
     
  4. MaineFarmMom

    MaineFarmMom Columnist, Feature Writer

    Messages:
    4,568
    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Location:
    Maine
    Not even a little surprised. I live in a town of 70 residents, surrounded by nothing but lakes and thousands of acres of forest.
     
  5. hillsidedigger

    hillsidedigger Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,565
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    Location:
    NC/Blue Ridge foothills
    A few years North Carolina was the state with the second largest total number of rural people. I do not recall which state was first and I do not know how it would rank now.
     
  6. Faustus

    Faustus Übernerd

    Messages:
    502
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2007
    Location:
    Maine by way of Yorkshire
    Not really, actually. A little surprised that, say, Wyoming wasn't one of them, but having driven through Vermont, it seemed like there was quite a bit of nothing (but very pretty nothing!) there. As a born and bred Mainer, our state is literally ninety percent forest, so I'm not very shocked on that one. Our cities are also very small, which I suspect impacts how they measured "ruralness." Then again, I don't know how big Cheyenne is, off the top of my head.

    I didn't appreciate Maine's rural side when I was a kid growing up there, but once I moved away, I really missed the woods, the ocean and the space. It's a beautiful place to be from- wouldn't change my having grown up there for anywhere else, I don't think.
     
  7. highlands

    highlands Walter Jeffries Staff Member Supporter

    Messages:
    9,639
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Location:
    Mountains of Vermont, Zone 3
    This came up before. Apparently one of the criteria is the typical town size. There are _NO_ cities in Vermont according to their definition. We have no urban areas. The largest gathering of people is under 40,000 (Burlington, VT). Now personally, I consider that a city. Heck, I consider Barre, Montpelier, Rutland, St. J., Bennington, etc all to be cities. Our town has a population of under 1,000 so anything as big as those looks like city. :)

    I like Vermont as is.

    Cheers

    -Walter
    Sugar Mountain Farm
    in the mountains of Vermont
    http://SugarMtnFarm.com/blog/
    http://NoNAIS.org