So far you have offered nothing except the opinion that any source of numbers except your secret one is false.You asked where it came from and I told you where I thought they had gotten it from. That didn't mean I agreed with it, and I think I made that perfectly clear.
If you look at articles similar to the one you posted, they all makes the exact same points. Coincidence or from a government source?
Wonder why they didn't apply that same logic to COVID deaths? Some states are going back over the records and deleting deaths not clearly related to COVIDHowever, a review of available clinical information, including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records, has not established a causal link to COVID-19 vaccines, says the CDC's website.
And they should. I think they jumped the gun and decided that anyone that had covid when they died should count as a death caused by covid. That's a silly leap, and doesn't help at all with determining how dangerous covid really is.Wonder why they didn't apply that same logic to COVID deaths? Some states are going back over the records and deleting deaths not clearly related to COVID
I agree. It seems to me and a lot of others that the numbers have been cooked all along to promote fear and the agenda of big government proponents. Is the Delta variant just more of the same? Is it really a dangerous variant or just a political scariant? I like to look at the number of daily tests here and other countries. Every time they want to get people scared again, the daily test numbers go way up. For a while we were only testing about 400K per day but they started the Delta variant rant and suddenly we are testing almost a million a day once again. We now know a lot of the new cases are people who have been fully vaccinated like the democrats who ran to DC from Texas. That makes it look like the vaccine is not too effective at preventing COVID and we know a small percentage of those vaccinated die from the virus but we definitely know only a small percentage of those who get the virus die too. So the question in some of our minds is how much less a person is likely to die from the virus if vaccinated compared to unvaccinated. We won't know that until enough time passes to gather the data.And they should. I think they jumped the gun and decided that anyone that had covid when they died should count as a death caused by covid. That's a silly leap, and doesn't help at all with determining how dangerous covid really is.
I too am familiar with the federal trough.I have done more government work here than maybe most here on HT. I know the routine. Charge the max and see what sticks. 7 times out of 10 you will get the max. There are no checks and balances. Just budgets that need to be inflated.
Say someone killed in the WTC towers on 9/11 was a terminal cancer patient. Do we still count him as a murder victim?The statistic I would like to see is the number of "covid deaths" that were actually something else entirely, but through false positives, or for hospital financial reasons, were declared as dying from covid 19. How many of these folks would have died from some other ailment within this time frame, but because the national narrative is to scare people about covid, their tow tags read "COVID 19".
I understand your point, remember the recent thread about logical fallacies? Because one person lied to Congress, you, me, the neighbor's dog, does not indicate that the rest of government/science/medical community is untrustworthy. They may be trustworthy and they may not be, but it is in no way dependent on the fact that Fauci is a liar.Say Mr. Fauci lied to congress and to you about everything you believed about the virus. Do you now question anything told to you by those in the government/science/medical community?
Would we count surplus deaths in New York on 9/11and still consider the number accurate?
It seems you are practicing Fauci logic. Cancer and the collapse of the World Trade Center have nothing in common. Whether the person had terminal cancer or not, the collapse would have killed him.