The Feds are at it again, starting July 1, 2015, minors under 21 years old can no longer hunt in the u.s. without a federal hunting license, a physical, an endurance test and a written test. All mandated from the Feds, BTW this law supersedes ANY state law currently in place. I am not sure what the purpose of all this is but if you do not agree with this join the NRA and their attempt at having this reversed. Next will be federal fishing licenses....
Newest laws: federal hunting regs
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
Joined
·
2,264 Posts
Fake.
Joined
·
9,430 Posts
If your going to post it post the supporting bill
the fed don't even make it's own soldiers pass what your suggesting they are placing on hunting
EVERYTHING lately is a push for younger hunters and easier access for first time child hunters the states know where the next generation of hunters are going to come from and they have to do everything they can to get them as early as possible before they are hooked on video games
no hunters = big time wild life management issues , predator issues and the loss of a >50 billion dollar a year industry
the fed don't even make it's own soldiers pass what your suggesting they are placing on hunting
EVERYTHING lately is a push for younger hunters and easier access for first time child hunters the states know where the next generation of hunters are going to come from and they have to do everything they can to get them as early as possible before they are hooked on video games
no hunters = big time wild life management issues , predator issues and the loss of a >50 billion dollar a year industry
Joined
·
5,730 Posts
I suspect the OP received an email similar to those ones that said "George Soros owns Remington".
One should not always believe everything that shows up in their email inbox.
These interwebs can be tricky.
One should not always believe everything that shows up in their email inbox.
These interwebs can be tricky.
Joined
·
11,554 Posts
Not true.. The article was originally reported by the National Report web site... a political satire web site... Then everyone started posting it to face book... and now we know the rest of the story.. .
Joined
·
3,551 Posts
That makes two of you.
Joined
·
14,353 Posts
Rules of Internet Accurancy Determination-
1) if it sounds too good to be true, check it out before swallowing it whole.
2) if it sounds too bad to be true, see action in rule one.
3) if rules one or two don't apply, check it out anyway.
1) if it sounds too good to be true, check it out before swallowing it whole.
2) if it sounds too bad to be true, see action in rule one.
3) if rules one or two don't apply, check it out anyway.
Joined
·
5,730 Posts
Snopes is good.
But I usually start with www.commonsense.com
But I usually start with www.commonsense.com
Joined
·
14,353 Posts
Frankly, if I see something I would like to know is true or not, I do a search with variations of key words. Then I look at the nature if the sites in the first couple of pages of hits. If they are all agenda driven, especially agenda driven blogs, then I discount it.
If a hit comes up that has some claim to authority, like a large national news outlet or official university/ nonprofit, etc, then I bother to check it out in detail.
A whole lot of urban legends or viral inaccuracies get eliminated fast that way.
Joined
·
13,677 Posts
Smells sort of like an onion.
Joined
·
14,353 Posts
But it is easy to let small bits of misinformation creepy into your brain. Something big or really off the wall, like announcements that a disliked politician is really an alien in disguise, is a flag to check it out. But a bit with an incidental incorrect fact sneaks in.
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
Join the discussion
Join now to ask and comment!