I have a 7mm rem mag that WAS my standby for elk, moose, bear etc., but as I have gotten more mature as a hunter, my shots are getting closer. So now I usually take my old WW2 .303 british with open sights for deer. I usually get within 20 yards before I shoot. I find the challenge enjoyable. And I do not really need the meat, that is what moose and elk are for.
My furthest deer was honestly probably less than 300 yards. I have not taken or used more than one shot on any of my game in many years.
Moose was about 250 yards, one shot. Bear, about the same, at a fast walk, one shot. Elk was around 200 yards, one shot.
Those are my furthest shots. All others have been MUCH closer. Between my hunting style, my lack of confidence and respect for my prey, and my obsession with conserving shells,( I have this compulsion to only use one shot per animal per year, so I make darn sure I can make the shot), I am leaning more towards shorter range rather than farther.
I know the tools are there today to make looooooong shots, but I also know that a slight deviation, wind gust, terrain unaccounted for, can wound game. I HATE wounded game. It is disrespectful, and gives hunters a bad name, IMO. Not saying it can't be done, it is just there is less room for error, when the hunt is done in such a way that the shots are close, on unalarmed, unsuspecting animals. Like last years whitetail. at 20 yards, it is hard to miss. It is fun knowing you know the animals well enough o get close and learn their habits and patterns: shooting at extreme distances in a lot of cases, (not all), is a sign of desperation and a lack of hunting skills.