Joined
·
746 Posts
Bravo! Bravo!..A win for the people of Kansas..
The Kansas Supreme Court has ruled that utility companies cannot charge customers who produce some of their own energy more than customers who pay for and receive power the traditional way. The court ruled the demand charges discriminatory and illegal.
There has been a pattern around the country of utilities demanding additional fees from property owners who choose to offset their utility costs by installing clean energy alternatives like solar panels and wind turbines.
The case in Kansas began in 2018 when Westar Energy, Inc. (now part of Evergy Inc.) and Kansas Gas and Electric Company created a new rate for residential customers who generated some of their own energy. The argument was that even though these “partial requirements customers” or “residential distributed generation customers” (DG customers) now used less utility-generated electricity, their personal savings did not help cover the utility company’s fixed costs (like capital investments, substations and poles, meters, billing, or customer service.) The power companies argued even though these customers are reducing their personal consumption, they should still be responsible for contributing to the cost of those needed services.
The Kansas Supreme Court has ruled that utility companies cannot charge customers who produce some of their own energy more than customers who pay for and receive power the traditional way. The court ruled the demand charges discriminatory and illegal.
There has been a pattern around the country of utilities demanding additional fees from property owners who choose to offset their utility costs by installing clean energy alternatives like solar panels and wind turbines.
The case in Kansas began in 2018 when Westar Energy, Inc. (now part of Evergy Inc.) and Kansas Gas and Electric Company created a new rate for residential customers who generated some of their own energy. The argument was that even though these “partial requirements customers” or “residential distributed generation customers” (DG customers) now used less utility-generated electricity, their personal savings did not help cover the utility company’s fixed costs (like capital investments, substations and poles, meters, billing, or customer service.) The power companies argued even though these customers are reducing their personal consumption, they should still be responsible for contributing to the cost of those needed services.