[Adirondackian]

Wait, WHAT?????? But the Supreme Court said there was no evidence of that.

"Writing for the majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett cited the lack of any “concrete link” between the restrictions that the plaintiffs complained of and the conduct of government officials – and in any event, she concluded, a court order blocking communication between government officials and social media companies likely would not have any effect on decision-making by those platforms, which can continue to enforce their policies."

Justices side with Biden over government's influence on social media content moderation

The Supreme Court on Wednesday threw out a lawsuit seeking to limit the government’s ability to communicate with social media companies about their content moderation policies. By a vote of […]

www.scotusblog.com

They've all made a mockery of the entire system. They lie so much they can't even keep track...and they really dont even seem to care.

 

[Adirondackian]

He knew who did it. When he gave his speech and he mentioned the elevator/teleprompter he looked right at somebody with a look that said "I see you, you little weasel".

 

[Adirondackian]

Was it part of Trump's team like the AP article said?

Come on.

 

[Adirondackian]

"A U.N. official speaking on condition of anonymity....".

So, according to AP, unnamed sources [ "Trust us, bro. It happened" ] made the claim. That pretty much violates rule #1 of assessing the credibility of a claim. There needs to actually be a person making the claim. In this case, there isnt one....its just a claim by AP about a claim. Its the vaguest type of accusation, and least likely to be true.