Clean ...
Dr. Diane Harper was the lead researcher in the development of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines, Gardasil™ and Cervarix™. She is now the latest in a long string of experts who are pressing the red alert button on the devastating consequences and irrelevancy of these vaccines. Dr. Harper made her surprising confession at the 4th International Converence on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia. Her speech, which was originally intended to promote the benefits of the vaccines, took a 180-degree turn when she chose instead to clean her conscience about the deadly vaccines so she “could sleep at night”. The following is an excerpt from a story by Sarah Cain:
“Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years. Harper also mentioned the safety angle. All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds. So far, 15,037 girls have reported adverse side effects from Gardasil™ alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), and this number only reflects parents who underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions. At the time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines. The reported side effects include Guillian Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently — sometimes eventually causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation. Parents are usually not made aware of these risks. Dr. Harper, the vaccine developer, claimed that she was speaking out, so that she might finally be able to sleep at night. ’About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have HPV at some stage of their life,’ Harper says. ’Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.’”
Likewise, another much-reproduced article claims that in 2009, Dr. Diane Harper (who is consistently misidentified as "the lead researcher in the development of Gardasil and Cervarix") gave a talk at which she "came clean" and admitted that "Gardasil and Cervarix don’t work, are dangerous, and weren’t tested." That article grossly misrepresents what Dr. Harper actually said. Dr. Harper has expressed concerns such as how long protection from vaccines such as Gardasil will last (which is not a safety issue, but rather an issue of whether the expected results of an HPV immunization program will justify the financial costs), and whether the marketing of Gardasil might lead some women to avoid taking other STD-preventing precautions, but she has never said that Gardasil "doesn't work," "wasn't tested," or was "dangerous," as explained in great detail at the Skeptical Report blog:
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/medical/drugs/...SUF1mKEZ5WU.99
Quote:
In a 2012 peer-reviewed article about Cervarix, Dr. Harper states that "Cervarix is an excellent choice for both screened and unscreened populations due to its long-lasting protection, its broad protection for at least five oncogenic HPV types, the potential to use only one-dose for the same level of protection, and its safety." Again, she speculates that cervical cancer screening may be just as useful, but nowhere does she recommend that the vaccine not be used, that it's safety profile is unacceptable, or that the vaccine cannot prevent cancer. In fact, she recommends expanding the guidelines for HPV vaccines for older women because as they age, they are more susceptible to other serotypes of HPV, against which Cervarix confers protection. She also states that Cervarix may also have a protective effect against some autoimmune disorders. This does not sound like a researcher who is losing sleep about the HPV vaccine, but who fully supports its use, with some exceptions.
Are people really still using Snopes as the guardians of 'the Truth'?
Snopes has been debunked.
They get funding from partisan sources and are nothing but a couple in SF looking stuff up on the internet, as if the internet can actually offer insight to anything better than real actual research.
Doesn't matter it is still 4 years old and has been debunked without using Snoops. It is still many ant vac folks getting together and putting out falsehoods.
__________________
Oh my, dishes yet to wash and dry
Doesn't matter it is still 4 years old and has been debunked without using Snoops. It is still many ant vac folks getting together and putting out falsehoods.
See, with cases of those who had the chicken pox vaccine popping up with shingles, I'm not willing to use anyone in my family as a guinea pig when proper health care and awareness are enough to combat this issue alone. Vaccines obviously need better testing... those people who came down with mumps recently? Most of them were vaccinated, so I guess the blind belief that vaccines are working just isn't necessarily true.
The problem is that the science has been corrupted by politics and business and is no longer able to progress unfettered as it ought.
I still will not have my kids vaccinated for hpv. Atrocious that they would market to 9 year olds!
It's big business; how do those terds sleep at night?
I still will not have my kids vaccinated for hpv. Atrocious that they would market to 9 year olds!
It's big business; how do those terds sleep at night?
How do they sleep? Like logs, thanks to drugs like Ambien!
15Likes
Lead Developer Of HPV Vaccines Comes
