US Coast Guard is going to sink that ghost ship - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > Specialty Forums > General Chat

General Chat Sponsored by LPC Survival


Like Tree7Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 04/05/12, 01:47 AM
naturelover's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,802
US Coast Guard is going to sink that ghost ship

Yup. The ghost ship decided it didn't like Canada so 3 days ago it changed course, crossed the Canada/USA border and is now making a bee-line for Sitka, Alaska. The Japanese owners decided they don't want it after all and nobody else wants to claim it so on Thursday (today) the US Coast Guard is going to fire cannons at it and sink it.

Sorry InvalidID, I know you had your heart set to salvage it and use it as a flag ship to start a west coast squidding fleet with it.

.
Sonshine likes this.

Last edited by naturelover; 04/05/12 at 01:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04/05/12, 04:35 AM
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 17,225
Seems a waste. You would think someone could scrap it out or something.
HeelSpur likes this.
__________________
Flaming Xtian
I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.
Mahatma Gandhi


Libertarindependent
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04/05/12, 05:18 AM
Gregg Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Republic of Alabama
Posts: 1,569
Should have been sunk long time ago
__________________


Deo Vindice O I'm a Good Old Rebel and thats what I am, I don't want no pardon for what I am and did
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04/05/12, 06:58 AM
naturelover's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,802
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinknal View Post
Seems a waste. You would think someone could scrap it out or something.
It might seem a waste to people that aren't familiar with the wild, rough contours and deep water character of the PNW coast, but sinking it is the most practical and environmentally friendly thing to do. Finding a place to scrap it out somewhere on this rough coastline is pretty much next to impossible. Finding someone willing to go to the expense and extreme hazard of towing it south through 40 foot high waves on the west side of the islands to some other place where it can be more easily scrapped is also next to impossible.

That problem was solved years ago though and this part of the coast has a long history of sinking scrappers to create artificial reef habitats close to the coastline to create new habitats for marine life and for deep sea diver fishermen to harvest seafoods from. There are many artificial reef habitats have been created along this coast by sinking scrappers, that even includes worn out old navy ships and even some few airplanes - the more metal there is on a ship the more steroid nutrients there are and the better it is for the new marine life that will be attracted to the new reef habitat.

Quote:

- The reef structure causes plankton and other micro-organisms to accumulate in the area rather than just float on by, and where there is food, larger organisms will begin to congregate.

- Larvae from numerous types of marine life have a surface to attach to, and larger marine life (there to enjoy the new food supply) have places to hide and to lay their eggs.

- small invertebrates and filter feeders soon begin to grow and inhabit the area, attracting small fish and other marine life, which in turn attracts larger predators and even more marine life.

- some artificial reef surfaces, such as iron based steel, also provide 'steroid' type nutrients which help the marine life to grow bigger and faster than it typically would, thus creating a food source for all levels of the food chain, including humans.

- before long, a small 'oasis' of life is created on and around this artificial reef where before there was nothing but sand, mud and silt.
.

Last edited by naturelover; 04/05/12 at 07:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04/05/12, 08:56 AM
beccachow's Avatar
Animal Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 12,211
Exactly, NL. Out of a tragedy can come great things and new hope.
__________________
Becky
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04/05/12, 10:30 AM
InvalidID's Avatar
Too Complicated For Cable
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Washington
Posts: 10,120
My fledgling navy is sunk before it ever even gets started... Always screwing the little future dictator I swear! lol
tinknal and mnn2501 like this.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04/05/12, 10:41 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,322
Quote:
Originally Posted by InvalidID View Post
My fledgling navy is sunk before it ever even gets started... Always screwing the little future dictator I swear! lol
Not tom mention the cost of ammo (your nickel too, and mine).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04/05/12, 10:58 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 5,778
Quote:
Originally Posted by naturelover View Post
Yup. The ghost ship decided it didn't like Canada so 3 days ago it changed course, crossed the Canada/USA border and is now making a bee-line for Sitka, Alaska. The Japanese owners decided they don't want it after all and nobody else wants to claim it so on Thursday (today) the US Coast Guard is going to fire cannons at it and sink it.

Sorry InvalidID, I know you had your heart set to salvage it and use it as a flag ship to start a west coast squidding fleet with it.

.
Good gunnery practice for the US Coast Guard.. and it serves a purpose also...
__________________
Pennsylvania Constitution, Article 1 Section 21 "The Right of the Citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned"
www.pafoa.org
http://www.45thpacok.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04/05/12, 11:54 AM
InvalidID's Avatar
Too Complicated For Cable
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Washington
Posts: 10,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by edcopp View Post
Not tom mention the cost of ammo (your nickel too, and mine).
Yeah, but they are clearing the shipping lanes and keeping it form beaching. We'd have to pay for the cleanup if it beached so I think we're getting a deal on this one.

Wish I could be the guy that sinks it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04/05/12, 12:04 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,494
That is the best solution.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04/05/12, 12:36 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,757
Why is no one showing compassion for the ghosts on the ship? You want to bomb their home simply because it is a nuisance? I don't think even Bush was ever accused of dimensional cleansing.
__________________
Dear Math, it is time you grew up and solved your own problems.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04/05/12, 12:49 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 5,778
Quote:
Originally Posted by poppy View Post
Why is no one showing compassion for the ghosts on the ship? You want to bomb their home simply because it is a nuisance? I don't think even Bush was ever accused of dimensional cleansing.
Well I think the problem is their ship isn't "ghostly" enough and can do some real damage to this dimensions land/property..

If the ghosts had kept their ship in their dimension, then I don't think it would have been a problem..

But then again maybe they are lost and are trying to find their way home back to the Bermuda Triangle...
__________________
Pennsylvania Constitution, Article 1 Section 21 "The Right of the Citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned"
www.pafoa.org
http://www.45thpacok.com
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04/05/12, 03:34 PM
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,892
The Sunken Ship will probably make a nice artificial reef for some fish, in that area. And, that's probably a beneficial outcome to the situation. It's better than having to Clean it up, if it should be Beached.
__________________
Be Intense, always. But always take the time to
Smell the Roses, give a Hug, Really Listen, or
Jump to Defend your Friends & What you Believe in.
'Til later, Have Fun,
Old John
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04/05/12, 05:30 PM
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 17,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by InvalidID View Post
My fledgling navy is sunk before it ever even gets started... Always screwing the little future dictator I swear! lol
All I can think of is McHale's Navy.
InvalidID likes this.
__________________
Flaming Xtian
I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.
Mahatma Gandhi


Libertarindependent
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04/05/12, 06:44 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dwelling in the state of Confusion - but just passing thru...
Posts: 8,092
Has anyone figured the final depth the ship will be in when

it settles to the bottom??? My understanding is, that the best artificial reefs are within a certain
specified distance of the surface, as well as other factors such as prevailing currents, distance from
shore, etc. Determining the best site starts with a purpose. The initial focus should be to enhance or
create good habitat that will benefit local fisheries. One must then consider the various social,
economic, environmental and biological concerns. Reefs that are improperly sited and do not take
all of these factors into consideration during the planning phase will result in wasted time, money and
effort and will not fully realize their true function and purpose. Water depth affects species composition
at the reef site. This includes all sessile and motile invertebrates associated with the reef as well as
plant life and fish assemblages. Reef materials placed in clear or shallow water with good light
penetration generally will provide the best results in meeting the typical biological objectives of
most artificial reef projects. Water depth is a key factor in determining the likely presence of desired
life history stages of target fish species. Also, water depth at the reef site may critically affect reef
material stability and long-term structural integrity. In this case, average wave energy in large,
open bodies of water as a function of water depth is the major concern. The magnitude of wave
interaction with a reef is difficult to predict but it can also be destructive.

From the sounds of things, it appears that more than likely MOST of the above requirements are
not even going to be considered......not enough time has been spent to consider the many
ramifications.......just get it beneath the surface as quickly as possible so that it doesn't endanger
legitimate shipping or end up on a beach somewhere, spilling out hazardous substances.....
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04/05/12, 09:27 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 3,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by copperkid3 View Post

Has anyone figured the final depth the ship will be in when it settles to the bottom??? My understanding is, that the best artificial reefs are within a certain specified distance of the surface, as well as other factors such as prevailing currents, distance from shore, etc. .....
How would one find out what the depth is? Do you know how to do that? The ship was sunk 170 nautical miles south-west of Sitka which is on Baranof Island in the Gulf of Alaska. At that distance out from Sitka I think it might be between 1,000 to 2,000 feet deep but I don't know how to find a topographical map of that part of the ocean floor to confirm the depth.

http://maps.google.ca/maps?hl=en&sug...-8&sa=N&tab=wl

Last edited by Paumon; 04/05/12 at 09:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04/05/12, 10:21 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: the end of the road, Alaska
Posts: 1,030
Dang! I was gonna tie a line to that thing, paint it pretty and make a floating brothel.
kasilofhome and Paumon like this.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04/06/12, 02:48 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 3,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrammasCabin View Post
Dang! I was gonna tie a line to that thing, paint it pretty and make a floating brothel.
And name it GrammasBrothel?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04/06/12, 03:11 AM
Bearfootfarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 34,168
Quote:
How would one find out what the depth is?
Do you know how to do that?
It might be on a Marine navigational chart, but I don't know offhand where to find one

Found it without a chart:

The Associated Press: Coast Guard cannon fire sinks Japanese ghost ship

Quote:
It sank into waters more than 6,000 feet deep in the Gulf of Alaska, about 180 miles west of the southeast Alaska coast, the Coast Guard said.
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04/06/12, 02:15 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dwelling in the state of Confusion - but just passing thru...
Posts: 8,092
Pretty much what I stated.....no thought given on actually

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearfootfarm View Post
It might be on a Marine navigational chart, but I don't know offhand where to find one

Found it without a chart:

The Associated Press: Coast Guard cannon fire sinks Japanese ghost ship
************************************************** *****
how to turn it into a beneficial and producing artificial reef......too far out for sport fishing
and too deep for divers or ANYTHING else to use it. So much for the propaganda
being espoused by the 'greenies' and gooberment officials....
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 PM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture