An interesting article about Monosanto. - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > Specialty Forums > General Chat

General Chat Sponsored by LPC Survival


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 12/21/11, 09:44 PM
NickieL's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Station
Posts: 14,761
An interesting article about Monosanto.

Thought some might be interested in this, if this is the wrong forum then feel free to move it. The link takes you to an on-line issue of Heirloom Gardener magazine from Baker Creek. It deals with wiki-leaks concerning Monosanto, USA and the EU.
Go to page six.
http://rareseeds.com/flip-magazin/index.html
__________________
It's not that I don't like mankind, I just like nature a whole lot more.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12/21/11, 09:59 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Manitowoc Wi
Posts: 739
Too small of type to read, but the headline says it all. Monsanto has killed more life than any other corporation and now it is in the altering natural life. Soon all honey bees will be altered and no one can do a thing about it ('cept tear down Monsanto)(I'm all for that!)..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12/21/11, 10:08 PM
NickieL's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Station
Posts: 14,761
you can enlarge it, by clicking on the page, there is a magnifier.
__________________
It's not that I don't like mankind, I just like nature a whole lot more.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12/21/11, 10:17 PM
Raeven's Avatar
Reluctant Adult
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Wilds of Oregon
Posts: 7,216
Nickie... good catch. I will need to source the assertions to confirm, but Wiki Leaks has a good track record.

Just... wow.
__________________
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change ready!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12/21/11, 11:13 PM
The cream separator guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Southern MO
Posts: 3,919
Article was taking too long and hogging all the bandwidth. What was it, 100 megs? ANy other place to view it? I'm always interested in hearing slams against the Spawn of Satan.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12/21/11, 11:56 PM
NickieL's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Station
Posts: 14,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heritagefarm View Post
Article was taking too long and hogging all the bandwidth. What was it, 100 megs? ANy other place to view it? I'm always interested in hearing slams against the Spawn of Satan.
sorry, I don't know of any other place to get it unless you find a place selling the print copy in the newstand.
__________________
It's not that I don't like mankind, I just like nature a whole lot more.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12/22/11, 08:52 AM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,485
OK, I found it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12/22/11, 09:33 AM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,485
The World of Scary Food LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The US grows a lot of Roundup Ready crops. The US has free trade with Europe. Most countries accept free trade as a way to increase their exports, but don't really want to import stuff that competes with their own stuff.

Let's say Mexico was getting sugar from us, free trade. Suddenly, they decide that they only want sugar made from Cane, not corn or beet sugar. The US would have to call "BS" and if they continued, we could stop importing their automobile parts. Give and take. Happens all the time.

Canada leases its timber for next to nothing to Canadian loggers, giving Canadian lumber companies an unfair advantage, so the US restricts Canada softwood.

The US farmers use BGH and Roundup Ready crops. Europe doesn't. While they could use this method, they can separate themselves from US products, keeping the door shut on US imports of grain and beef. It has been argued that these restrictions go way beyond science or common sense.

The US farmer isn't going to go back to non-GMO grains, but they want free trade. But Europe won't take down those artificial barriors on their own. Push comes to shove. That's how world trade works.

For awhile, South Korea was fussy about US beef, because of the Mad Cow deal a few years ago. They understood that the prions were in the spinal cord and marrow. So they imported onlt bone-less cuts. They reserved the right to reject an entire shipment of tons of beef, it they found one bone flake. But they still wanted to ship cars to us.

This kind of stuff goes back and forth all the time on all sorts of products. It is no secret.

Round up has a very low toxicity and breaks down quickly. Currently, there are more toxic herbicides used against broad leaf weeds in lawns. Round up ready blue Grass would lower the toxins in the soil, reduce groundwater and open water contamination and reduce the cost of maintaining a lawn or pasture.

Scary stuff, not.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12/22/11, 10:34 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by haypoint View Post
The World of Scary Food LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The US grows a lot of Roundup Ready crops. The US has free trade with Europe. Most countries accept free trade as a way to increase their exports, but don't really want to import stuff that competes with their own stuff.

Let's say Mexico was getting sugar from us, free trade. Suddenly, they decide that they only want sugar made from Cane, not corn or beet sugar. The US would have to call "BS" and if they continued, we could stop importing their automobile parts. Give and take. Happens all the time.

Canada leases its timber for next to nothing to Canadian loggers, giving Canadian lumber companies an unfair advantage, so the US restricts Canada softwood.

The US farmers use BGH and Roundup Ready crops. Europe doesn't. While they could use this method, they can separate themselves from US products, keeping the door shut on US imports of grain and beef. It has been argued that these restrictions go way beyond science or common sense.

The US farmer isn't going to go back to non-GMO grains, but they want free trade. But Europe won't take down those artificial barriors on their own. Push comes to shove. That's how world trade works.

For awhile, South Korea was fussy about US beef, because of the Mad Cow deal a few years ago. They understood that the prions were in the spinal cord and marrow. So they imported onlt bone-less cuts. They reserved the right to reject an entire shipment of tons of beef, it they found one bone flake. But they still wanted to ship cars to us.

This kind of stuff goes back and forth all the time on all sorts of products. It is no secret.

Round up has a very low toxicity and breaks down quickly. Currently, there are more toxic herbicides used against broad leaf weeds in lawns. Round up ready blue Grass would lower the toxins in the soil, reduce groundwater and open water contamination and reduce the cost of maintaining a lawn or pasture.

Scary stuff, not.
Good overview.

I'm an organic gardener and against herbicides generally but another thing is soil loss. When they used roundup ready crops they don't have to plow and so there is less loss of top soil.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12/22/11, 11:46 AM
texican's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carthage, Texas
Posts: 12,261
I can't wait till we get rid of Monsanto and all commercial farming once and for all.... along with about 6 billion folks that depend upon them. The world will have time to heal, global warming will no longer be a concern, and anyone surviving will be able to do whatever they please!
__________________
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. Seneca
Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival. W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12/22/11, 12:04 PM
NickieL's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Station
Posts: 14,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by haypoint View Post
The World of Scary Food LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The US grows a lot of Roundup Ready crops. The US has free trade with Europe. Most countries accept free trade as a way to increase their exports, but don't really want to import stuff that competes with their own stuff.

Let's say Mexico was getting sugar from us, free trade. Suddenly, they decide that they only want sugar made from Cane, not corn or beet sugar. The US would have to call "BS" and if they continued, we could stop importing their automobile parts. Give and take. Happens all the time.

Canada leases its timber for next to nothing to Canadian loggers, giving Canadian lumber companies an unfair advantage, so the US restricts Canada softwood.

The US farmers use BGH and Roundup Ready crops. Europe doesn't. While they could use this method, they can separate themselves from US products, keeping the door shut on US imports of grain and beef. It has been argued that these restrictions go way beyond science or common sense.

The US farmer isn't going to go back to non-GMO grains, but they want free trade. But Europe won't take down those artificial barriors on their own. Push comes to shove. That's how world trade works.

For awhile, South Korea was fussy about US beef, because of the Mad Cow deal a few years ago. They understood that the prions were in the spinal cord and marrow. So they imported onlt bone-less cuts. They reserved the right to reject an entire shipment of tons of beef, it they found one bone flake. But they still wanted to ship cars to us.

This kind of stuff goes back and forth all the time on all sorts of products. It is no secret.

Round up has a very low toxicity and breaks down quickly. Currently, there are more toxic herbicides used against broad leaf weeds in lawns. Round up ready blue Grass would lower the toxins in the soil, reduce groundwater and open water contamination and reduce the cost of maintaining a lawn or pasture.

Scary stuff, not.
Why do big corps think they have the right to FORCE other countries who are opposed to the control over their food systems that Monsanto wants ? Why should they be forced to accept potential devastating genes into their food and seed supply? I certainly don't want it. Everything here is already getting tainted, even the wild plants.
__________________
It's not that I don't like mankind, I just like nature a whole lot more.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12/22/11, 12:09 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Manitowoc Wi
Posts: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by texican View Post
I can't wait till we get rid of Monsanto and all commercial farming once and for all.... along with about 6 billion folks that depend upon them. The world will have time to heal, global warming will no longer be a concern, and anyone surviving will be able to do whatever they please!
Me too.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12/22/11, 12:11 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Manitowoc Wi
Posts: 739
I already posted this link on another thread, has relevance here as well:

http://www.postcarbon.org/article/61...rices-threaten
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12/22/11, 12:13 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Manitowoc Wi
Posts: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollowdweller View Post
Good overview.

I'm an organic gardener and against herbicides generally but another thing is soil loss. When they used roundup ready crops they don't have to plow and so there is less loss of top soil.
There are other methods using cover crops that that build up the soil AND it not necessary use toxic poison on the land.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12/22/11, 12:39 PM
NickieL's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Station
Posts: 14,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by sevenmmm View Post
There are other methods using cover crops that that build up the soil AND it not necessary use toxic poison on the land.
exactly! Chemicals are not always (and seldom really is) the answer. It may be FASTER and EASIER but at what cost to the future?!
__________________
It's not that I don't like mankind, I just like nature a whole lot more.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12/22/11, 01:46 PM
sisterpine's Avatar
Goshen Farm
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Zone 8a, AZ
Posts: 6,183
Yes there are many ways to produce food- some really good healthy ways in fact. Though I doubt at this point that small farms could even feed the masses in America? I think we need some big commercial farms even though they dont do it my way. Not every american in new york city has space for a country garden.
__________________
www.MontanaSticksAndStones.com at Goshen Farm
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12/22/11, 03:20 PM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickieL View Post
Why do big corps think they have the right to FORCE other countries who are opposed to the control over their food systems that Monsanto wants ? Why should they be forced to accept potential devastating genes into their food and seed supply? I certainly don't want it. Everything here is already getting tainted, even the wild plants.
It isn't big corps forcing anything. It is countries. We (US) grow GM Corn and GM Soybeans. The governments of Europe have used this fact to create a way to ban US corn and soybeans from being imported. But they want (get) free access to the US market for other things.

You are free to believe what you want but the scientific facts prove otherwise. There are no devastating genes in our food or seed supply. Food in this country is safer than ever, partly because farmers do not need to use dangerous pestacides, due to GMO.
What wild plants are tainted?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12/22/11, 03:30 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Manitowoc Wi
Posts: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by sisterpine View Post
Though I doubt at this point that small farms could even feed the masses in America?

Probably not sister. But the Monsanto stockholders would be pleased to know Monsanto is also expert at killing people. So they make money either way.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12/22/11, 03:32 PM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by texican View Post
I can't wait till we get rid of Monsanto and all commercial farming once and for all.... along with about 6 billion folks that depend upon them. The world will have time to heal, global warming will no longer be a concern, and anyone surviving will be able to do whatever they please!
You are wrongly assuming that everyone will simply lay down and die. I doubt that. More and more ground would be turned up and planted to crops, even environmentally fragil areas. Much more fuel would be needed to cultivate without weed killers. More erosion and loss of top soil due to cultivation. Irrigation would be a way to increase yeilds, exhausting our water table.Sensitive grasslands would be needed to grow corn and soybeans. Highly erodable lands would be needed as crop land.

The earth has been through a few Global Warming and just aas many Ice Ages. All without our weak efforts. One Mt St. Helen threw up more gasses and soot than every tail pipe for the past 100 years.

You depend on Monsanto and the modern agriculture that goes with it. Because when it fails, a few of those 6 billion people are gonna come and gobble you up, Mmmmmm..... Texan....
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12/22/11, 03:37 PM
SquashNut's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 11,431
Wow, I though people on this forum wanted the right to choose the foods they eat, but all of a sudden other countries don't. More power to the countrys that have banned monsanto and their vile concoctions. They must realize their food choices could make or break their county.
__________________
squashnut & bassketcher

Champagne D Argent, White New Zealand & Californian Cross Rabbits
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 AM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture