Pay your fair share - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > Specialty Forums > General Chat

General Chat Sponsored by LPC Survival


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 08/21/11, 07:19 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: lat 38° 23' 25" lon -84° 17' 38"
Posts: 3,051
Pay your fair share

Anybody else get tired of hearing that spouted out? How's this for fair. How bout you don't get a nickle back from the IRS vampires unless you paid them something to begin with. How is the gov't sending someone money they never earned and paid to them in the first place called earned credit?
Oh, I didn't make squat or pay a brass farthing in taxes, so where's my refund.

It's not quite a flat tax, but a step in the right direction. While you're at it, mark me down for means testing for a whole slew of gov't give aways. I swear the older I get the less tolerance I have for due moss in life.
__________________
"Only the rocks [and really embarassing moments] live forever"

"When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands..." tick-tick-tick
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08/21/11, 07:32 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Farmerwilly2 View Post
It's not quite a flat tax, but a step in the right direction.
If my math is right a flat income tax that funded the government at the same level it is today would cost each adult somewhere around $11K+ a year.
That's well above the $10,712 a minimum wage worker makes in a year working 40 hours a week.




A return for nothing is stupid...

Last edited by RebelCowboySnB; 08/21/11 at 07:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08/21/11, 09:37 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: south central KY 75 miles SSE of Louisville
Posts: 1,359
I think most flat tax proposals I have heard about have some form of exemption on income, as in it doesnt apply to you if you make below a certain figure of income.
And then, it is somewhat graduated into levels above that minimum amount.

Thing is, it would do away with the IRS, at least as far as it is incarnated today.
__________________
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons...for you are crunchy and good with ketchup!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08/21/11, 09:50 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,798
One thing I'd like to see- If you wear loafers most of the time, you don't qualify for a farm subsidy.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08/21/11, 10:14 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 8,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by stormwalker View Post
One thing I'd like to see- If you wear loafers most of the time, you don't qualify for a farm subsidy.
I know a man worked in the woods logging barefoot
Know a trucker wears house shoes no socks says they are cheap
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08/21/11, 10:25 PM
watcher's Avatar
de oppresso liber
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by RebelCowboySnB View Post
If my math is right a flat income tax that funded the government at the same level it is today would cost each adult.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
Well THERE'S your first problem.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RebelCowboySnB View Post
somewhere around $11K+ a year.
That's well above the $10,712 a minimum wage worker makes in a year working 40 hours a week.
The second is a flat tax usually refers to a flax tax rate, i.e. everyone pays the same percentage on their income. Say the tax rate was 15% your worker would pay $1,606.80 whereas someone making $50,000 would pay $7,500.00 and someone making $1,000,000 would pay $150,000.

For me to support such a tax it would have to have no deductions. Once you start adding deductions you do two things. 1) You change the effective rate which means one American citizen is paying more than another. 2) It gives the pols a way to use the system to buy votes.
__________________
Remember, when seconds count. . .
the police are just MINUTES away!

Congress has no power to appropriate this money as an act of charity. Every member upon this floor knows it. . .Davy Crockett
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08/21/11, 10:25 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sawmill Jim View Post
I know a man worked in the woods logging barefoot
Know a trucker wears house shoes no socks says they are cheap
Do you think either of those guys WERE loafers?!?!?!
LOL
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08/22/11, 01:26 AM
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 325
Quote:
Originally Posted by watcher View Post
The second is a flat tax usually refers to a flax tax rate, i.e. everyone pays the same percentage on their income. Say the tax rate was 15% your worker would pay $1,606.80 whereas someone making $50,000 would pay $7,500.00 and someone making $1,000,000 would pay $150,000.
But wouldn't the tax rate have to be closer to 50%? That's assuming the same "no change" thing.

I think we need to drop the income tax an replace it with a sales tax with a food exemption. That way you get to choose how much the government gets by how high on the hog you live
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08/22/11, 01:29 AM
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sawmill Jim View Post
I know a man worked in the woods logging barefoot
Know a trucker wears house shoes no socks says they are cheap
I have been working my farm all summer barefoot. Last week I stuck a stob threw my foot an could barely walk for 2 days. Broke down an spent $15 at walmart for some sandals.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08/22/11, 02:22 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by RebelCowboySnB View Post
I have been working my farm all summer barefoot. Last week I stuck a stob threw my foot an could barely walk for 2 days. Broke down an spent $15 at walmart for some sandals.
You're no loafer!!
But, what's stob?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08/22/11, 03:01 AM
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 325
Quote:
Originally Posted by stormwalker View Post
But, what's stob?

The leftover stump of a cut down weed, bramble or bush.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08/22/11, 03:18 AM
EDDIE BUCK's Avatar  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Eastern N.C.
Posts: 8,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by RebelCowboySnB View Post
The leftover stump of a cut down weed, bramble or bush.
yep thats what they call it around here.However,,LOL,I have heard people use it describing a stabbing. Man, He stobbed him in the heart
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08/22/11, 06:04 AM
po boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Watertown, Tn.
Posts: 2,152
Lots a sore toes from stobs in my childhood..

Back to the tax thingy. Half the country is supporting the other half. It has to stop..

A fair tax is a national sales tax that replaces all federal payroll taxes. Imagine you make a $100,000 grand a year and you live in a state that has no income taxes and you ahve no deductions for Insurance, ira etc. Your check is for $100,000. Under the Fair tax plan yoy pay a 20% Federal sales tax when you make a purchase. That 20% covers your Federal Income taxes, your employers portion of fica medicare and corporate taxes.

20% sounds high, but cost of goods should come down since the corporations are not paying taxes. Wages could go up 7.65% since the employer's doesn't pay fica - medicare.

A biggy in this is the undergrouind cash under the table guys. If they buy, they pay taxes.

The IRS is done away with!!!

Look into it:
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_no...words=fair+tax

Poor folks get a pre-bate.
__________________
Mortgage Underwriters
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08/22/11, 08:46 AM
Murphy was an optimist ;)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 21,492
Quote:
Originally Posted by RebelCowboySnB View Post
If my math is right a flat income tax that funded the government at the same level it is today would cost each adult somewhere around $11K+ a year.
That's well above the $10,712 a minimum wage worker makes in a year working 40 hours a week.




A return for nothing is stupid...
We are spending about 4 trillion per year.. if you divide that between 300 million people, you get a bit over 12K per person per year... if you have a stay at home spouse and 2 kids... YOUR fair share of that becomes around 48 grand per year.

the only way to be "fair" is to reduce the spending to an affordable level. Any other plan is going to gouge someone quite unfairly.
__________________
"Nothing so needs reforming as other peoples habits." Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08/22/11, 09:54 AM
watcher's Avatar
de oppresso liber
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by RebelCowboySnB View Post
But wouldn't the tax rate have to be closer to 50%? That's assuming the same "no change" thing.
No, the last time I checked if we put in a flat tax with a rate of 13% with no deductions we could cover ALL the cost of running the government. This was a few years ago and didn't have to cover the huge debt nor its interest.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RebelCowboySnB View Post
I think we need to drop the income tax an replace it with a sales tax with a food exemption. That way you get to choose how much the government gets by how high on the hog you live
Why only food? Don't people also need housing? Shouldn't we exempt rent and house sales? How about meds? Are you going make people pay taxes on the drugs they need to live better lives? Also what is food? Is a candy bar food? Deli chicken?
__________________
Remember, when seconds count. . .
the police are just MINUTES away!

Congress has no power to appropriate this money as an act of charity. Every member upon this floor knows it. . .Davy Crockett
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08/22/11, 11:54 AM
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 325
O ok. 13% does sound better if the numbers work.

I did not mean that could be the only exemption but one that it would be needed. Food exemption is allready in effect in some states an I think candy bars are in on them a eating out is not but I have not looked in to it.
Drugs may need to be exempted to.
Rent should not be eximpt. Rent prices would change very little because of the tax change. Remember the rental owner is already figures in there income taxes in to the price of the rent. There figures would not change much. You are just substituting the words income tax with the words sales tax in there books. Now rental owners may chose to change prices because of the change in everyones take home income an everyones general change in expenses.

The main thing is you would have more control over your money. The government only gets it when you chose to spend it.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08/22/11, 12:03 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 325
Quote:
Originally Posted by po boy View Post
A fair tax is a national sales tax that replaces all federal payroll taxes. Imagine you make a $100,000 grand a year and you live in a state that has no income taxes and you ahve no deductions for Insurance, ira etc. Your check is for $100,000. Under the Fair tax plan yoy pay a 20% Federal sales tax when you make a purchase. That 20% covers your Federal Income taxes, your employers portion of fica medicare and corporate taxes.

20% sounds high, but cost of goods should come down since the corporations are not paying taxes. Wages could go up 7.65% since the employer's doesn't pay fica - medicare.

A biggy in this is the undergrouind cash under the table guys. If they buy, they pay taxes.
This is what I like. I'm one of the people that dont pay in any income taxes already an would be paying out more if we made that change but I think it would be a good change over all.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08/22/11, 02:59 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,053
You may someday see your fair tax, but you'll also see the income tax along with the IRS.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08/22/11, 03:24 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yvonne's hubby View Post
We are spending about 4 trillion per year.. if you divide that between 300 million people, you get a bit over 12K per person per year... if you have a stay at home spouse and 2 kids... YOUR fair share of that becomes around 48 grand per year.

the only way to be "fair" is to reduce the spending to an affordable level. Any other plan is going to gouge someone quite unfairly.
That's easy -- add the Balanced Budget Amendment, as well as an amendment that states no more Federal debt -- i.e. Treasury Bills -- that they need to be paid from general funds as they come due and fed.gov isn't allowed to print more of them.

Cutting fed.gov spending is the biggest solution!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08/22/11, 03:51 PM
jefferson's Avatar
fuzzball in the Cascades
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: State of Jefferson
Posts: 633
Narshalla, don't forget term limits !!!!!!
__________________
I am me. I like me. Please don't try to change me.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 PM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture