
08/07/05, 08:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 391
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by citygoatwoman
i did, however, do the somatic count, which just shows the *overall* bacteria count, doesn't tell you which ones specifically.
|
You're confused.  Plate counts tell you how many bacteria are growing in your milk; somatic cell counts are an indication of whether or not the dairy animal tested is mounting an immune response to disease within the udder, i.e. mastitis. Bacteria can get in your milk either premilking or post milking, and you solve each problem differently.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by citygoatwoman
the lab tech reported that it was the cleanest raw milk she'd ever seen. she asked me twice if i'd pasteurized it.
|
Don't mean to rain on your parade, but generally when milk shows no bacterial growth by the time it makes it to the lab, there's something inhibiting it---either antibiotics from insufficient withdrawal time after treating an animal, or insufficient rinsing of utensils after sanitizing. It's not usually a good thing.
As far as TB and Brucellosis go, you test the animal, not the milk. And you can test milk for any pathogen (although it's expensive), but it won't get you much since you'll have to do it again on the next milking to be sure of anything. Listeria bacteria (which cause listeriosis) are ubiquitous---everywhere in the soil---and whether or not your milk tests postive for them can change from milking to milking, depending on how you've handled the milk.
It's not as easy as just testing once, and figuring everything is OK. It's an ongoing task that you have to have some understanding of, or you're just gambling.
|