
06/12/14, 12:38 PM
|
 |
My name is not Alice
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: On a dirt road in Missouri
Posts: 4,185
|
|
|
Welcome to the cattle forum!
Not knowing your level of experience leaves me guessing and assuming many things. Don't be offended by these follow-on questions.
1) Do you have a good eye for what "normal" looks like? In my own limited experience with a FF (3), none were exactly a faucet of milk at the very first expression. In fact, one was so rock hard with edema that it was like milking a brick. It took the calf to loosen her up over a couple of days. On another, her colostrom was too thick to express. Same story. It took a calf.
2) It sounds like you are getting some milk. Is that out of all 4 or just 1 or...?
3) How old is the cow in question? I am mostly curious about this (all other answers being deemed "abormal"). I kind of tend to think like MO_cows in that, at a certain age, a heifer is capable of producing a calf. Also a certain age, she is capable of producing milk. I don't know that the two ages necessarily track conveniently.
...
The "yearling" comments reminds me of the my own sloppy usage of the term. I'll call a calf a "yearling" as soon as I wean it--even if it is only 6 months old--because that is how I start handling it. "Time to go move the yearlings...". No worries there. But I'll sometimes continue to call it that (in error) until it is laying on the ground and pushing out its first calf a full two years later--looking up at me reminding me that "I stopped being a yearling when you turned my in the bull." Because I am sloppy with the term, I assume the rest of the world is as well, and don't consider it a trustworthy term for use in trade or troubleshooting. For instance, if you were to post an ad for a yearling, one of my first questions would be "when was it born?", because at that age, I need to know #of months, not just that it "is youthful".
__________________
Honesty and integrity are homesteading virtues.
|