
09/02/08, 04:49 PM
|
 |
Udderly Happy!
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,830
|
|
|
Heartstrings,
The amount of feed you feed her isn't nearly as important as the nutritional value of the feed you're feeding her.
An example: This year in Oklahoma hay has been very plentiful (Praise the Lord!). However, because of the price of fertilizer most of us have not been able to afford putting bulk fertilizer on the hayfields as recommended. This being the case, most of the bermuda being tested this year by our extension service is testing out at less than 6% protein. At this protein rate, a cow could stand eating her whole life and not even maintain her body weight without being supplemented protein levels through feed or alfalfa hay. If you're feeding her a cheap "chain store" brand of sweet feed, she's probably not getting at the most 10% protein and 3% fat content. If she's in milk and you're actually trying to put weight on her, you would be money ahead putting her on a better performing ration that would have the potential of not only maintaining weight but adding it as well. If you want to get down to it, it would also be very beneficial to have the hay you're feeding tested for TDN (total digestable nutrients) and protein quality.
The glory of all this is that most of this can be obtained either free or at a greatly reduced charge from your local county extension office. Most counties have a livestock expert that is paid by OUR tax dollars to help folks like you and me figure out a good diet for your cattle. The majority of us are lead to believe that these experts are on hand for large stock producers. In fact, the majority of livestock producers are small homesteaders with less than ten head of cattle in Oklahoma.
I hope you get that critter fattened up!
__________________
Francismilker
"The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much" James 5:16
|