
11/29/06, 08:27 AM
|
|
Seeking Type
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 2,102
|
|
|
Lets say this is true. The reason this might have become more of a voluntary program, is because of the logistics of actually implanting a chip in every last farm animal out there. Trying to track down a horse, or a single cow way up in some hill would be impossible. Is someone going to come along and say "Hey that there feller up there, has a cow, no chip der'". It would become extremely expensive for the government to actually do it. The voluntary part might be for those who want to export beef to foreign countries, you want a paper trail for an animal. However that in itself isn't easy. Because many large cattle yards buy animals from others, who might not use NAIS. However those who sell to the yards, might implement it so they too can sell. If you think about it, it could be one of those things that trickle down, and before you know it, you finding yourself implementing it, then the next guy. Because you might be in the beef buisness, and perhaps that animal with a paper trail could be worth more, because the market is different. Think about that, perhaps thats what they want to see happen, or know could happen regardless of it being mandatory. Because there could be that demand for something that is more concrete.
Of course it would be a big joke, and would throw NAIS out the window if an animal who had a paper trail, didn't have any signs of BSE, then comes down with it, all by herself/himself. Think about the implications of that for NAIS.
Jeff
__________________
"Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death" Patrick Henry, March 23rd, 1775
|