Why small farms can not feed the world anymore... - Page 6 - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Homesteading Questions


Like Tree572Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #101  
Old 06/27/13, 01:36 AM
Forerunner's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 9,898
Makes one wonder how the pioneers made it before they built the first Piggly Wiggly.
__________________
“I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.” Barry Goldwater.
III
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 06/27/13, 06:14 AM
blooba's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Finally!! TN
Posts: 2,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forerunner View Post
Makes one wonder how the pioneers made it before they built the first Piggly Wiggly.
They lived with what they had. Winter time was the time to eat meat,potatoes,canned goods,ect.. Summertime was the only time they ate salads and what not. I have to admit it would be hard to do that as I like a good salad every so often(even in winter time), but if we all put some thought into what that meal is actually costing us I'm sure we could cut down all the transportation and frankenfoods we eat.

My grandmother (born in the 20's) said, every christmas each kid got a banana in their stocking, that was the only time they ever got a banana. Now we have mountains of banana's that rot at the super market that sell for pennies per pound. We don't put any thought of what it takes to get that banana here, or tomato in the middle of winter,ect. because the costs are so subsidized. We don't keep US military in Columbia just because of the drug trade, banana's are big money and until we pay $10/pound or whatever it is truely costing us we will continue in our little blissful world.
tickranch likes this.
__________________
U.S. Constitution -10th Amendment
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 06/27/13, 06:35 AM
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,864
A plant based diet is linked to a longer life span. Diets heavy in meat and animal fats are linked to reduced life spans. You can do some research on this yourselves and bluezones.com is a good starting point.

I don't believe in paleo-diets, or atkins diets or any diet that recommends replacing carbs with more fats and proteins. The longest lived people in the world eat primarily a plant based diet, they garden and grow a good portion of their own food, they are light weight, generally about 18-22 on their BMI.
fireweed farm and Naja002 like this.
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 06/27/13, 06:59 AM
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pugnacious View Post
I couldn't disagree more. Most people can't afford to farm. Big difference between desire and ability. Any place I have ever lived farmable land is priced so high that it would be impossible to break even much less turn a profit. People need to live. Unless one inherits land or finds an incredible deal on it, it is basically impossible.



I guess I am part of the generation that always gets grilled for being lazy and only being into "gadgets". I have been working since Thursday. Non stop. Catching a cat nap in my truck when I'm not on the rig floor or crunching numbers. I work with many 20 somethings who have left their families and lives behind to make a good living. I'm sure many would love to be home farming but people follow the money......
I agree. Not only is property expensive, the incentive to farm has dried up with profits.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 06/27/13, 07:20 AM
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,864
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimberlyg View Post
I agree. Not only is property expensive, the incentive to farm has dried up with profits.
Truth be told, I could feed 40-50 people on my farm if I were to dedicate myself and land to producing food. But I don't because all the regulations, subsidies and taxes that have been created to disincentivize small farming. They have created an artificial market for middlemen and massive volume producing agribusiness.

How can I compete with someone who receives a government subsidy? How can I make a profit if I have to pay a state processing center to do all my butchering, and pay the transport both ways? Then I have to keep mandatory insurances, pay out 1/3rd of every dollar I make to the government, pay the broker, or pay to sell at a market. Why is raw milk such a crime now? Because it takes the 'cut' away from large pasteurization interests and allows the small farmer to compete with big ag.

Some here may be right, small farms can't feed the world....because our government, which has been bought by large corporate interests, will not allow it.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 06/27/13, 09:06 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: South Central Wisconsin
Posts: 14,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forerunner View Post
Makes one wonder how the pioneers made it before they built the first Piggly Wiggly.
Provisioners moved west right along with them. Diet was bland but they had their salt, sugar, and coffee or tea. In towns, shops and their keepers have been the norm for thousands of years. That allowed for the trade of crops for manufactured items, just as the title of this thread implies.

Martin
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 06/27/13, 09:34 AM
Ernie's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In the Exodus
Posts: 13,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darntootin View Post
A plant based diet is linked to a longer life span. Diets heavy in meat and animal fats are linked to reduced life spans. You can do some research on this yourselves and bluezones.com is a good starting point.

I don't believe in paleo-diets, or atkins diets or any diet that recommends replacing carbs with more fats and proteins. The longest lived people in the world eat primarily a plant based diet, they garden and grow a good portion of their own food, they are light weight, generally about 18-22 on their BMI.
I could concede your point if you just said "plant based". But as soon as you include grains into that diet, the lifespan drops dramatically.

Dr. Weston Price did a lot of research on this topic and analyzed the diets of peoples all over the world. The healthiest people did NOT eat grains.

Grains and starches all break down into raw sugar. Eat a slice of bread and you might as well have had a Snicker's bar.
hurryiml8 likes this.
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 06/27/13, 09:54 AM
Explorer's Avatar  
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: White Mountains, Arizona
Posts: 2,478
The Snicker's bar is probably better for you.
__________________
Mess with me? I may let karma take care of it. Mess with my family? I become Karma.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 06/27/13, 10:08 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,524
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paquebot View Post
Provisioners moved west right along with them. Diet was bland but they had their salt, sugar, and coffee or tea. In towns, shops and their keepers have been the norm for thousands of years. That allowed for the trade of crops for manufactured items, just as the title of this thread implies.

Martin
I didn't think the issue was if a small farm could produce everything you would need on that farm, but rather that collectively small farms can produce enough food to feed the world. To have any sort of palatable diet and variety, trade will always be needed.
ET1 SS likes this.
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 06/27/13, 11:24 AM
Forerunner's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 9,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paquebot View Post
Provisioners moved west right along with them. Diet was bland but they had their salt, sugar, and coffee or tea. In towns, shops and their keepers have been the norm for thousands of years. That allowed for the trade of crops for manufactured items, just as the title of this thread implies.

Martin
Tell that to Jubal Sackett.
plowhand likes this.
__________________
“I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.” Barry Goldwater.
III
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 06/27/13, 12:12 PM
Ernie's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In the Exodus
Posts: 13,422
There has always been provisioners. Wherever there were people, someone showed up to sell them something.

But there's a big difference between going to town for a pound each of sugar, coffee, and salt and the wholesale investment in groceries that most people do today.

The fact that the pioneers went into town to buy knives, a bolt of cloth, or some salt and coffee doesn't minimize their ability to survive independently out on their homesteads.
unregistered168043 likes this.
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 06/28/13, 10:13 AM
MD Steader's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Western Maryland
Posts: 237
Quote:
Originally Posted by oregon woodsmok View Post
But let me point out that I am not willing to live in poverty in order to provide cheap food to hundreds of unappreciative city dwellers who don't even know where their food comes from.

It's all well and fine to live a simpler life to provide for my own family. But I refuse to drive an ancient car, not have any machinery, do without any conveniences and work 14 hours a day to provide wheat for 10 cents a pound to make those Big Macs with.

So don't count on me to produce cheap food for the masses.

I think a point that is missed here is that shiney new truck and tractor are depreciable deductible business expenes for a farmer in business to make money and pay bills. WHen you can write it off the financial model changes.
__________________
I ken spel fine I jist kent type.
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 06/28/13, 10:21 AM
ET1 SS's Avatar
zone 5 - riverfrontage
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Forests of maine
Posts: 5,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Steader View Post
I think a point that is missed here is that shiney new truck and tractor are depreciable deductible business expenes for a farmer in business to make money and pay bills. WHen you can write it off the financial model changes.
Even old trucks can be write-offs.

I just bought a '81 dump truck.

plowhand and MD Steader like this.
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 06/28/13, 10:37 AM
MD Steader's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Western Maryland
Posts: 237
Quote:
Originally Posted by ET1 SS View Post
Even old trucks can be write-offs.

I just bought a '81 dump truck.

And you are right on that point too. I bought an old bush hog to mow my fields and creek, five years amortization of the $250. But like I said, around here many of the larger (400+ acre) guys will buy the stuff new, run it into the ground then trade them in. Since the gov't is paying to put corn in gas tanks our local guys are making out, the places with hay fields are doing good too.
__________________
I ken spel fine I jist kent type.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 06/28/13, 10:44 AM
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,864
If we were to get the government out of the way, out of the pockets of big ag and have a truly free market for food production, small farms would explode. In ten years the amount of food production accountable to small local farms would multiply exponentially.

In twenty years, large corporate agribusiness would be the exception, not the rule. The entire industry is warped by artificial demand created by government for the benefit of the biggest players.
plowhand and Glacialtill like this.
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 06/28/13, 11:16 AM
MO_cows's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: W Mo
Posts: 9,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darntootin View Post
If we were to get the government out of the way, out of the pockets of big ag and have a truly free market for food production, small farms would explode. In ten years the amount of food production accountable to small local farms would multiply exponentially.

In twenty years, large corporate agribusiness would be the exception, not the rule. The entire industry is warped by artificial demand created by government for the benefit of the biggest players.
I wholeheartedly agree that the government micro-managing the ag industry has led to problems. I would like to see subsidies phased out, and in the future only used on an emergency basis - if price supports are needed to ensure supply.

I disagree that large agribusiness would go the way of the buffalo even if the govt got out of the way. Because the quantities of food needed today are so huge. If you need to procure a particular food item, do you want to deal with 50 small producers, or just one or two larger ones? If you need to buy 10 pigs, do you want to go around to 10 different farms with one pig for sale, or just go to the one farm who has 10 pigs for sale? The convenience factor comes into play along with the efficiency of scale.
__________________
It is still best to be honest and truthful; to make the most of what we have; to be happy with the simple pleasures and to be cheerful and have courage when things go wrong.
Laura Ingalls Wilder
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 06/28/13, 01:08 PM
sammyd's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Central WI
Posts: 5,399
some funny posts on here.
Quote:
How can I compete with someone who receives a government subsidy?
You do know that there are really no subsidies for vegetable and beef farmers right?
As a matter of fact growers of fruits and vegetables do not receive the dreaded direct payment subsidies and if a farmer who was on the direct payment plan switches to fruits and veggies, the payments go away.

Beef receives little in the way of subsidies. There are programs that can help the beef producer like EQUIP, but even as a smaller producer you could probably get some of that for help with your facilities. NRCS will hand out some bucks for conservation stuff like erosion control and even fencing and watering equipment to smaller guys as well.
As for dairy, the MILC has a limit so really, the guy with 2000 cows isn't getting any more than the guy with 130 or so, and even then, they only get anything if the price is low, it is not a constant flow of money for the most part.
And if you are selling milk on herd shares, or raw milk by the gallon out the back of your barn, these prices shouldn't affect you in any way as you are not selling wholesale and shouldn't be pricing your product as if you were.
I don't believe egg farmers get any sort of direct subsidies either.

So if you're a small guy with a CSA, truck garden, or trying to pick up a contract with a local store or restaurant, subsidies are not slowing you down.
__________________
Deja Moo; The feeling I've heard this bull before.
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 06/28/13, 01:31 PM
ET1 SS's Avatar
zone 5 - riverfrontage
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Forests of maine
Posts: 5,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by sammyd View Post
...
I don't believe egg farmers get any sort of direct subsidies either.
I do not mean this to argue with you. A simple question.

I see a dozen eggs in the grocery store selling for 99cents.

We buy chicks, brood them, and then feed them to maturity; they finally begin laying, but only for a while until they molt.

I am willing to ignore the expense of the chicken coops.

I am not going to provide timed lights and heat in the coops to get them to lay through the winter; that is far too expensive to do.

On the second year, my egg production is a bit better. Since they do not start as chicks, so they will lay beginning in the spring.

Counting all lifetime eggs from a hen after it's second year. Along with two years of feed.

It is hard to break even marketing eggs at $2.50/dozen.

So without subsidies; how do the grocery store eggs get trucked a 1,000 miles and still end up being sold at 99cents?
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 06/28/13, 01:40 PM
sammyd's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Central WI
Posts: 5,399
I do not know, but according to eggbill.com egg producers receive no direct subsidy.
__________________
Deja Moo; The feeling I've heard this bull before.
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 06/28/13, 02:07 PM
ET1 SS's Avatar
zone 5 - riverfrontage
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Forests of maine
Posts: 5,869
I can not see how, you can include distributors and trucking and still market eggs for 30% of what it costs to produce eggs.

I am familiar with Earl Butz. I have watched his explanation of Farm Subsidies, and I do understand his reasoning. It is a way to manipulate the market resulting in lower food prices for the consumer. Every dollar spent in farm subsidy lowers grocery store prices by $10. I get it.

Which is why I had assumed that there must be some form of subsidy with eggs.

Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Small acreage farms harvestmoonfarm Homesteading Questions 21 05/25/13 12:51 AM
What you feed, is what you get. JeffNY Cattle 11 10/03/05 08:54 PM
Great way I reduced feed costs natybear Goats 7 07/04/05 11:02 AM
Observations of a Reactionary Nature Haggis Cattle 37 02/24/05 01:48 AM
Why is it (BIG farms) JeffNY Cattle 35 02/03/05 01:12 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 AM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture