491Likes
 |
|

01/16/13, 08:25 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,513
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thestartupman
I worked with a man once, who's property taxes were $1166 PER MONTH. I thought mine were bad enough at $320 per month.
|
Yep, that's about what ours are. I put away $1200 a month to pay the bill in January, March and May.
|

01/16/13, 09:43 AM
|
 |
AFKA ZealYouthGuy
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NW Pa./NY Border.
Posts: 11,453
|
|
|
I wouldn't live somewhere that had taxes that high. My current taxes are too high already.
Paying to use my own land/house is shameless anyway... but that's a different thread.
|

01/16/13, 09:51 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 82
|
|
|
"Just had to say that SS was NEVER intended to be a person's only income when they retire."
Wendy you are wrong. SS is NOT ment to be a supplemental income. As soon as a retired person begins to make additional income, or has income from an investment his SS is reduced. If it were ment to supplement your other incomes this wouldnt be the case.
|

01/16/13, 09:54 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,513
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by seedspreader
I wouldn't live somewhere that had taxes that high. My current taxes are too high already.
|
I would love to move where taxes are lower but:
* I grew up here and my dad and my in-laws live here.
* We love the area - living right next to the water and can sail for 8 months of the year.
* We have a church here that we love and couldn't leave it that easily (my husband is the pastor).
* I just don't know where I'd want to go!
So we suck it up and cry when we pay the bill but rejoice the rest of the time because we live in a really great place.
|

01/16/13, 09:59 AM
|
 |
Singletree Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kansas
Posts: 12,974
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanet
"Just had to say that SS was NEVER intended to be a person's only income when they retire."
Wendy you are wrong. SS is NOT ment to be a supplemental income. As soon as a retired person begins to make additional income, or has income from an investment his SS is reduced. If it were ment to supplement your other incomes this wouldnt be the case.
|
It really was pitched to the American public as a supplement. I remember it well.
When I was a kid, retired folks pensions and savings were gutted by inflation. It was widely reported that elderly people were eating dog food because it was what they could afford, even though they had been prudent and had what *HAD* been a generous pension.
The solution the government figured up was SS. Basically, everybody pays in and everybody gets money out THAT IS ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION! For a while it worked as it was intended, but the government has changed the regulation again and again and again. It no longer works as well as they had intended.
|

01/16/13, 10:08 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 82
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by K.B.
sounds like a great set-up! do you have a blog/site somewhere that has some of your story in getting to where you are at today?
Once we get past the house construction stage, I'd like to see us get our expenses down to ~2K/month with the various insurance premiums included. Won't happen til we stop building, though.
|
No, I am not much of a writer. We have been thinking of opening up a school of sorts. Having a family or a couple come stay in our guest house for a week or 2 and work with us every day just to see if its for them and how to do it.
I have to say, none of what we do is unique to us, we have just been doing what MEN, Countryside, Backwoods Home have been showing people how to do for years. I guess we were just too naive to realize it couldnt be done. So we did it.
|

01/16/13, 10:14 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terri
It really was pitched to the American public as a supplement. I remember it well.
When I was a kid, retired folks pensions and savings were gutted by inflation. It was widely reported that elderly people were eating dog food because it was what they could afford, even though they had been prudent and had what *HAD* been a generous pension.
The solution the government figured up was SS. Basically, everybody pays in and everybody gets money out THAT IS ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION! For a while it worked as it was intended, but the government has changed the regulation again and again and again. It no longer works as well as they had intended.
|
You were a kid in 1935??
|

01/16/13, 10:34 AM
|
 |
Singletree Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kansas
Posts: 12,974
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zong
You were a kid in 1935??
|
Yoiks! I was not!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I didn't realize SS was that old. I must be remembering when SS was changed in the 60's, LOL!
|

01/16/13, 10:39 AM
|
 |
AFKA ZealYouthGuy
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NW Pa./NY Border.
Posts: 11,453
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annsni
I would love to move where taxes are lower but:
* I grew up here and my dad and my in-laws live here.
* We love the area - living right next to the water and can sail for 8 months of the year.
* We have a church here that we love and couldn't leave it that easily (my husband is the pastor).
* I just don't know where I'd want to go!
So we suck it up and cry when we pay the bill but rejoice the rest of the time because we live in a really great place.
|
Yup, I totally get that. That's why God calls us all to different places.
|

01/16/13, 10:40 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 5,069
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanet
"Just had to say that SS was NEVER intended to be a person's only income when they retire."
Wendy you are wrong. SS is NOT ment to be a supplemental income. As soon as a retired person begins to make additional income, or has income from an investment his SS is reduced. If it were ment to supplement your other incomes this wouldnt be the case.
|
What are you talking about? There is no offset of SS for working or having investment income and you can be a multi millionaire and draw social security. Social security was indeed meant as a supplement to a regular retirement and when I can draw it in a few years (if its still around) it will just be pin money in addition to the multiple retirements I am already drawing.
I think you are confused with social security disability payments.
|

01/16/13, 11:34 AM
|
|
Registered Users
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Scappoose, Oregon
Posts: 18
|
|
|
No car payment, no house payment, house/car insurance is 100 a month, electric expensive here, at least 100 a month, gasoline to work is biggy, I am a contractor and sometimes have to drive a long way, 250 a month, food 200, prop taxes, 100 a month, critter feed, 100 a month, satellite internet 80, cell phone is 50, and then I am out of money. So probably not unless I don't want to do anything but sit in my driveway and get rid of my animals.
|

01/16/13, 12:02 PM
|
 |
Very Dairy
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dysfunction Junction
Posts: 14,603
|
|
If I didn't have my cows to feed, I could live like a queen on $1,000 a month.
__________________
"I love all of this mud," said no one, ever.
|

01/16/13, 12:31 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,224
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanet
"Just had to say that SS was NEVER intended to be a person's only income when they retire."
Wendy you are wrong. SS is NOT ment to be a supplemental income. As soon as a retired person begins to make additional income, or has income from an investment his SS is reduced. If it were ment to supplement your other incomes this wouldnt be the case.
|
Also when SS began the average life span of a man was 61 yrs old. At the time they figured many could pay in and a very few would get paid in old age. Now almost everyone pays in and almost everyone lives long enough to get paid. Not to mention the children who get checks after parents pass etc. It was a system designed to fail for that reason.
|

01/16/13, 01:47 PM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: IL, right smack dab in the middle
Posts: 6,787
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by salmonslayer
What are you talking about? There is no offset of SS for working or having investment income and you can be a multi millionaire and draw social security. Social security was indeed meant as a supplement to a regular retirement and when I can draw it in a few years (if its still around) it will just be pin money in addition to the multiple retirements I am already drawing.
I think you are confused with social security disability payments.
|
Nope Social SECURITY INSURANCE was meant as a net, a catch all. It was not meant for people in your situation and that is why its losing solvency.
|

01/16/13, 03:01 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan's Thumb
Posts: 6,322
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanet
You are so right! I had an employee a while back, that no matter how much I gave him on Friday. He had to borrow gas money on monday. I am not talking minimum wage, he had some weekly checks over $3000. His utiities were constantly getting shut off, and he never had anything. I guess he had a "good time" though? 
|
That is so sad.
It's a good thing I'm not his wife. A month or two of me yanking a kink in his arse and he'd be whistling a different tune.
But I wouldn't be attracted to someone like that..
Last edited by suitcase_sally; 01/16/13 at 03:06 PM.
|

01/16/13, 03:08 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,513
|
|
|
I do SwagBucks for a few extra dollars a month. It's a lot of work for a few bucks but I'm home anyway so I do it. I had a survey ask what income bracket I was in:
$0 - $250,000
$250,000 - $500,000
$500,000 - $1,000,000
$1,000,000 +
I clicked on the first one obviously and was disqualified. I commented on the SB Facebook page about how many millionaires were doing SwagBucks and a woman said that her SIL made over $250,000 and did SB because she had 3 kids in college. LOL Seriously? Even if you actually paid every penny of college, you still have about a hundred grand leftover for yourself with three in college! I've got 2 in private college and make quite a bit less than 1/3 of that!!! She said "Well, money is tight for them!!" Umm - just because that's their choice, honey!
|

01/16/13, 04:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 5,069
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fantasymaker
Nope Social SECURITY INSURANCE was meant as a net, a catch all. It was not meant for people in your situation and that is why its losing solvency.
|
I think you misunderstand my point, right now there is nothing stopping a wealthy person or a person still earning a good salary from drawing SS even though they dont need it because it is age based and not need based. On my last statement I have paid in over 72K to SS lifetime and am eligible to draw 1200 and change a month when minimally eligible. I will have recouped my 72K in 5 years and my life expectancy is far beyond that 5 years...that is why it is failing.
SS was implemented as a safety net for the poor and a supplement to individually earned retirement, it was never meant to be the primary retirement program of most people. The poster I was responding to put out incorrect information that if you work past SS age they deduct what you earn from what you are drawing on SS which is false. The subject of needs based SS eligibility is precisely what is being debated in Congress right now.
|

01/16/13, 04:57 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 19,350
|
|
|
Melissa, true, you can get most or all of state and federal income taxes back. But in most cases some is still deducted and you have to file to get what little was taken back. That's all I was trying to point out, it's still deducted unless you file the W-4 exemption for federal income taxes. As for the city taxes, if you live or work inside city limits it's still taken out and you never get it back. Really stinks IMO.
So yes, in order to have $1000 a month take-home pay, you have to earn more than $1000 a month. How much more depends on how you figure and file your taxes, where you work and where you live.
Just kind of reminds me about the time when Mom moved out on her own with us kids in tow. $120 a year in taxes would have been an extra $10 a month. There were months when that $10 would have made a HUGE difference. I don't like living that close to the edge.
Last edited by Danaus29; 01/16/13 at 05:03 PM.
|

01/16/13, 09:08 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Central New York State
Posts: 5,694
|
|
|
My household couldn't function on $1000 per month. Our monthly bills are higher than that. Our primary residence has a mortgage as do a couple of our rentals. Luckily for us, our rentals provide more income than $1000 per month and we don't have to earn it at a job. In other words, if one of us were to get sick, we still have an income.
|

01/17/13, 08:26 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: GA & Ala
Posts: 6,207
|
|
My dad drew SS for about six months and then went back to work full time (he was 68 at the time and retirement in full was age 65 for him). My mom had to pay back every penny he earned to SS. My Dad was not on SS disability either. He had regular SS. My dad continued to work until he passed away at age 72. The SS office said he made too working at his regular job and was not "retired". In other words, if you don't retire, you cannot draw SS. So we had to pay it back. My mom still rants about that, but my dad retired, hated it and went back to work within months of his official "retirement".
Here are the rules on working and drawing SS:
http://ssa-custhelp.ssa.gov/app/answ...ement-payments
__________________
Be yourself - no one can tell you that you're doing it wrong!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 AM.
|
|