117Likes
 |
|

08/05/12, 05:02 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: South Central Wisconsin
Posts: 14,801
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErinP
I wonder how the Inuit, the various Plains tribes and other nomadic nations around the globe managed to have such excellent health, then?
|
Genetics!
Martin
|

08/05/12, 05:51 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: W Mo
Posts: 9,269
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nowherewoman
Meh. I don't eat that much meat and it hasn't hurt me. I did at one time because I believed I *had* to have it. After all, I was on medication for anemia as a child and eating it does make me feel good. But so does eating watermelon or blueberries or a lot of other things.
Besides being very expensive, eating too much meat is bad for your health. Protein in the form of beef is hard on the kidneys and the heart and the gut.
I really don't get what the uproar is about ... unless all those protesting are making their money through cattle! 
|
Hard on the kidneys, heart and gut? Pu-lease. Everyone is different and will thrive on a somewhat different diet and regimen. If you are not robust enough to digest meat then stick to fruits, berries and supplements and you have my sympathy. But a lot of people who eat meat, red meat, as a big chunk of their diet are quite healthy and live a long time. Look at Julia Child, she ate tons of saturated fat and red meat in her lifetime and she perked along right up into her 90s and died in her sleep. We should all be so lucky. So if you have bad genes and/or live a sedentary lifestyle, then maybe yes you should avoid it. But a blanket statement like was made above is absolutely, positively not true.
__________________
It is still best to be honest and truthful; to make the most of what we have; to be happy with the simple pleasures and to be cheerful and have courage when things go wrong.
Laura Ingalls Wilder
|

08/05/12, 06:34 PM
|
 |
Miniature Horse lover
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Central WI.
Posts: 21,245
|
|
|
Ya they can stop me eating meat on mondays when they "Pry My Knife and Fork From My Dead Cold Hands".
|

08/05/12, 06:43 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Appalachia
Posts: 555
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by arabian knight
Ya they can stop me eating meat on mondays when they "Pry My Knife and Fork From My Dead Cold Hands".
|
Amen!
__________________
 Going hungry ain't much of a plan
|

08/05/12, 06:59 PM
|
 |
More dharma, less drama.
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas Coastal Bend/S. Missouri
Posts: 30,490
|
|
|
__________________
Alice
* * *
"No great thing is created suddenly." ~Epictitus
|

08/05/12, 11:11 PM
|
 |
Too many fat quarters...
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SW Nebraska, NW Kansas
Posts: 8,537
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paquebot
Genetics!
Martin
|
Nope.
Diet.
|

08/05/12, 11:17 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: South Central Wisconsin
Posts: 14,801
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErinP
Nope.
Diet.
|
Wasn't diet that also caused those same people to be lactose intolerant.
Martin
|

08/06/12, 07:02 AM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 192
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alice In TX/MO
|
::sigh::
1. I have celiac disease. I'm one of the people who really does have it and hasn't just diagnosed myself via Dr. Google. I haven't depended on wheat as a food source in years.
2. Paleo, Atkins, you name it, btdt years ago. By my count, you're running 10-15 years behind *my* curve. Didn't do me much good except for a whopping case of gout.
This is the kind of information I depend on these days:
Red meat consumption linked to increased mortality
Not nearly as trendy, but sure works!
|

08/06/12, 07:56 AM
|
 |
Too many fat quarters...
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SW Nebraska, NW Kansas
Posts: 8,537
|
|
And yet, again, we have entire civilizations that disprove that.
|

08/06/12, 08:14 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wouldn't you like to know der, eh? Zone 3b/4a
Posts: 1,809
|
|
|
During the LAST great depression, before the advent of food stamps and welfare checks, the USDA published meal suggestions to help people get through hard times and boost their morale. Most of those meal suggestions were meatless or had very small amounts of meat included.
I, personally, would like to see more suggestions like these and less food stamps.
Why should my tax dollars be paying to feed meat to people who can get by just as easily with a few meatless days per week (or onely one or two meat days per week)?
__________________
"What if I fall?" "Oh, but my darling, what if you fly?"
|

08/06/12, 08:18 AM
|
|
The cream separator guy
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Southern MO
Posts: 3,919
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom_the_chemist
The USDA was circulating an internal memo entitled "Greening Headquarters Update." In the memo they stated the following,
“While a vegetarian diet could have a beneficial impact on a person’s health and the environment, many people are not ready to make that commitment. Because Meatless Monday involves only one day a week, it is a small change that could produce big results.”
“According to the U.N., animal agriculture is a major source of greenhouse gases and climate change. It also wastes resources.”
“In addition there are many health concerns related to the excessive consumption of meat.”
Is this really what we want the agricultural department endorsing when they should be protecting those who raise and butcher animals for consumption?
For more info see:
USDA’s Vegan Days Cancelled « Protect What's Right
|
I don't understand what the big deal is. The USDA [suggests] we have meatless Mondays, and people scream that they need to stop "regulating." Blatant truths are spoken, "We eat too much meat;" and people scream that they are raging against farmers.
Beef is hard to produce. It [does] take more resources to produce than crops, with the exception of grass-fed cattle.
__________________
I'm an environmentalist, left wing, Ron Paul loving Prius driver with a farm. If you have a problem with that, kindly go take a leap.
|

08/06/12, 09:15 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: sc
Posts: 3,364
|
|
|
the thing is, is that USDA is suppose to be supporting meat growers. not telling people NOT to eat it and saying "it is to help the planet"
|

08/06/12, 09:51 AM
|
|
Terra-former
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,885
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heritagefarm
I don't understand what the big deal is. The USDA [suggests] we have meatless Mondays, and people scream that they need to stop "regulating." Blatant truths are spoken, "We eat too much meat;" and people scream that they are raging against farmers.
Beef is hard to produce. It [does] take more resources to produce than crops, with the exception of grass-fed cattle.
|
Who is screaming??? (always interesting to see people call it screaming if views different from their own are expressed)
by whos measure is it a blatant truth "we" eat to much meat??? We are all built different. If you think there is one set diet that fits all humans, you probably havent delved into the topic to deeply.
Why in the world do you think beef is hard to produce?? I assume you mean feedlot cattle? which simply wouldnt exist without subsidies, atleast nothing like the frequency we have today. where I live cattle out number people, and they are all freeranged. In systems Id personally call wise, animals are using what humans cannot often including wastes from other crops. there is a reason why humans were so apt to domestivcate animals right in line with crop production. Done well they fit together like a glove and support eachother. I cant fathom a long term way to grow our food without lots of animals that doesnt itself include some major input displacement. For balanced systems in my opinion you need both. (Id also add that 50% of the worlds beef comes from arid regions, unable to readily grow other things, and most of these areas could multiply biomass grown for their cattle with the right methods, something I think will happen on its own as more people learn said skills)
Im also curious why your talking of beef alone? Lots of other animals out there. Including more efficient at feed conversion animals such as goats and rabbits.
__________________
I have a high desert arid mountainous climate. Working towards self sufficiency. The potentials of plant breeding and building micro climates amaze me. We must learn to ride the wave.
|

08/06/12, 09:52 AM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: far north Idaho
Posts: 11,134
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tailwagging
the thing is, is that USDA is suppose to be supporting meat growers. not telling people NOT to eat it and saying "it is to help the planet"
|
The USDA's ultimate mission is to serve the American public, not the meat growers. If it truly is bad for people to eat meat every day (not saying I believe that it is) , I would be incensed for the USDA to tell us otherwise just to support the meat industry.
|

08/06/12, 09:55 AM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: far north Idaho
Posts: 11,134
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by silverseeds
by whos measure is it a blatant truth "we" eat to much meat??? We are all built different. If you think there is one set diet that fits all humans, you probably havent delved into the topic to deeply.
|
This I definitely believe. I'm an O blood type, cavewoman, Paleo kind of gal myself. But I believe different people evolved to need different diets.
|

08/06/12, 10:15 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 3,326
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alice In TX/MO
|
Alice I agree with the theory behind this totally. And it just makes common sense. I think if we ate this way from the beginning we'd be fine, excluding commercially fed animal products of course. My concern, because of my work, is what about people who already have diseased cardiovascular systems (practically all Americans, to varying degrees.) Is this type diet enough to actually heal that. We know that the vegan model works to reverse vascular disease.
I am always ahead of the curve  We stopped eating shortening (actually all hydrogenated fats) 20 years ago when the first research started coming out about it. Have eaten almost no sugar in that time either. Stopped gluten 10 years ago. Not many people can claim those things.
Last edited by Cliff; 08/06/12 at 10:24 AM.
|

08/06/12, 10:34 AM
|
 |
Miniature Horse lover
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Central WI.
Posts: 21,245
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tailwagging
the thing is, is that USDA is suppose to be supporting meat growers. not telling people NOT to eat it and saying "it is to help the planet"
|
Yes they are until a peta person got in their and is now spreading THEIR agenda around.
|

08/06/12, 11:49 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: W Mo
Posts: 9,269
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heritagefarm
I don't understand what the big deal is. The USDA [suggests] we have meatless Mondays, and people scream that they need to stop "regulating." Blatant truths are spoken, "We eat too much meat;" and people scream that they are raging against farmers.
Beef is hard to produce. It [does] take more resources to produce than crops, with the exception of grass-fed cattle.
|
I don't see it as screaming, I see it as an ongoing effort to correct all the mis-information that has been put out there. There have been studies done that document the health benefits of lean beef in the diet, but, gee, somehow they don't end up on the 5 o'clock news like the "beef will kill you" studies.
I also doubt your assumption that beef consumes more resources than growing crops. The feedlot phase of modern beef production is the shortest period of the animal's life. It has spent most of its life on pasture, which generally is land not suited for growing any kind of crops in the first place. The practices of producing beef are much closer to nature than, say, an air-conditioned building with a state of the art ventilation system for raising modern pork and poulty, or even some of the fish farming practices. The electricity goes out and thousands of chickens or pigs would die. And they still have the gall to put "natural" on the retail package??? Yet it is beef that seems to always come under attack. It just gets old...very old.
And take into account that this is a homesteading board, so the beef that most of the readers are consuming was likely home-raised and not part of the "big ag" production system anyway.
And again, for the USDA to be actively promoting "meatless Monday" seems to be supporting the mis-information and lies put out by the AR groups and others. Not how I want my tax dollars spent.
__________________
It is still best to be honest and truthful; to make the most of what we have; to be happy with the simple pleasures and to be cheerful and have courage when things go wrong.
Laura Ingalls Wilder
|

08/06/12, 12:27 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: sc
Posts: 3,364
|
|
it is called U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Sen. Jerry Moran Questions USDA Promotion of "Meatless Mondays"
Fox and Friends Highlights Sen. Moran's Comments about "Meatless Mondays" at USDA
Sen. Moran Voices Concern Over Upcoming USDA Forum
|

08/06/12, 12:29 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: sc
Posts: 3,364
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by arabian knight
Yes they are until a peta person got in their and is now spreading THEIR agenda around.
|
I agree
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 AM.
|
|