Rural kids, parents angry about Labor Dept. rule - Page 2 - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Homesteading Questions


Like Tree65Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 04/25/12, 02:23 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: the end of the road, Alaska
Posts: 1,030
I wonder how this affects the fishing industry. The schools even close in May here, when the fish are in, so the kids can deckhand for their parents.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04/25/12, 02:39 PM
City Bound's Avatar
Male
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 5,895
I did not agree with forcing kids to wear helmits( I was pizzed off about this, but I do not have any kids. If i had kids I would have been more in the mood to fight back), I still do not agree about cars seats and booster seats (all of us here grew up without them and we are still here to tell the tale), and I do not think the gov can make us wear seat belts.

Even forcing kids to go to highschool is a joke. All the education people had, other then the basics, did not really help them in real life

Last edited by City Bound; 04/25/12 at 08:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04/25/12, 03:18 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 5,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by watcher View Post
My first thought is; People want government to protect the children from stupid parents until that protection effects them. No one had any problem with government forcing parents to make their kids wear bike helmets. After all it protects the kids. No one had any problem with the government forcing parents to put their kids in car seats. After all it protects the children. Why should these people have a problem with the government forcing parents to keep their kids from doing "dangerous" work? Add that to all the other stuff people have no problem with and this is just another thread in the rope being used to hang us.

Any more and we'll have to move to GC.
Not the same Watcher; your analogy would be appropriate if the government banned kids from riding bikes or riding in cars hich they didnt. This new law bans kids from doing certain things no matter how carefully supervised.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04/25/12, 03:40 PM
arabian knight's Avatar
Miniature Horse lover
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Central WI.
Posts: 21,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by salmonslayer View Post
I think your snark is unwarranted particularly when your wrong again. From the WHD website: "On February 1, 2012, the Department announced that it will re-propose the portion of its regulation on child labor in agriculture interpreting the "parental exemption." The parental exemption allows children of any age who are employed by their parent, or a person standing in the place of a parent, to perform any job on a farm owned or operated by their parent or such person standing in the place of a parent. The re-proposal process will seek comments and inputs as to how the department can comply with statutory requirements to protect children, while respecting rural traditions. The re-proposed portion of the rule is expected to be published for public comment by early summer. The department will continue to review the comments received regarding the remaining portions of the proposed rule for inclusion in a final rule."

They are going to be seeking public comment so it seems to me this was a timely post.

Here is a link: U.S. Department of Labor - Wage and Hour Division (WHD) - Child Labor - Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Amend the Child Labor in Agriculture Regulations
No it was revised according to my post. The Date was in feb of 2012.
Not what that article refers to one that was made in 2011.
If t=you would click on the link in THAT article where it says Hfirst proposed
That takes you to what was released on[08/31/2011]

And that article never mentions that is has been revised early this year because of of the bad being said about it.

But the new revised version is what I posted and was released in Feb.

I forgot to Put the Link to what I quoted and bolded.
But the article in OP was written today~!
BUT they LINK it back to the Fall one that was written on [08/31/2011]

Here is revised version that I quoted from and posted about. Note The Date is was written. 2-01-2012

WHD News Release: US Labor Department to re-propose 'parental exemption' of child labor in agriculture rule [02/01/2012]
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04/25/12, 03:57 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 5,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by arabian knight View Post
No it was revised according to my post. The Date was in feb of 2012.
Not what that article refers to one that was made in 2011.
If t=you would click on the link in THAT article where it says Hfirst proposed
That takes you to what was released on[08/31/2011]

And that article never mentions that is has been revised early this year because of of the bad being said about it.

But the new revised version is what I posted and was released in Feb.

I forgot to Put the Link to what I quoted and bolded.
But the article in OP was written today~!
BUT they LINK it back to the Fall one that was written on [08/31/2011]

Here is revised version that I quoted from and posted about. Note The Date is was written. 2-01-2012

WHD News Release: US Labor Department to re-propose 'parental exemption' of child labor in agriculture rule [02/01/2012]
AB, your still not grasping it. Your reference of 1 Feb 2012 is a re-proposal of their revised regulations and they are going to take public comment on that this summer. This is far from settled and I posted the link and the exact wording. Its been all over the news today for some reason.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04/25/12, 04:12 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,419
At the age of 7 I knew how to drive a tractor and a pick up (although I am a girl, I was the only child at home so Dad had to have my help bringing in the hay. Until I was 12, I drove the truck cause I could not throw the bales on it). I got up at 7 am on weekends and every day during the summer to work in my Dad's chicken houses. Helped with the hogs, the horses, the cows, the garden. Helped wth the cannng, etc. I got my work ethic from WORKING as a kid. That is a large part of what is wrong with this country, so few people anymore have a good work ethic. My dad always told me, "give a man a fair day's work for a fair day's pay". A lesson I have remembered and followed all my life. Kid's nowadays, not so much--too coddled.
grandma12703 likes this.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04/25/12, 04:31 PM
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SW Missouri
Posts: 7,934
Conspiracy Alert:

You don't suppose they want to replace all the kids with illegal immigrants, who they can amnesty, and get to vote democrat do you?

Just a thought.
Reb, am1too and Laura Zone 5 like this.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04/25/12, 04:39 PM
||Downhome||'s Avatar
Born in the wrong Century
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,058
If I'm not paying them its not employment!

If its not employment they can umm "Step off"!

Now if its the neighbor kids, I could just "gift" them some "money" for thier "gift" of "labor"
Their are work arounds...

Sometime its all in how you put it!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04/25/12, 04:40 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 3,326
No I think they want us all living in cities and dependent on govt while agribusiness feeds us all. While we are independent minded and self sufficient we are hard to control. And there's that pesky clutching our bibles and guns problem...
Jim-mi, am1too and Laura Zone 5 like this.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04/25/12, 04:42 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ozark foothills, Mo
Posts: 1,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozarks Tom View Post
Conspiracy Alert:

You don't suppose they want to replace all the kids with illegal immigrants, who they can amnesty, and get to vote democrat do you?

Just a thought.
Amnesty, shamesty,PHHHtttttt, why do you think they don't require a proper ID,.They've already allowed 'em to vote in the last election in lots of places...

Last edited by poorboy; 04/25/12 at 04:43 PM. Reason: form
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 04/25/12, 04:42 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 16,124
Cording to how i red the revisial Kids still couldnt work off the farm as I did when haying for the neighbors. Course, Whats there left for kids to do anymore. Dont ned them on the threshing ring. Dont need them bailing hay, Dont need them picking corn or cutting wood in winter.

They arent takeing any jobs away. There arent any to take.
Tracy Rimmer and springvalley like this.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04/25/12, 04:52 PM
watcher's Avatar
de oppresso liber
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by salmonslayer View Post
Not the same Watcher; your analogy would be appropriate if the government banned kids from riding bikes or riding in cars hich they didnt. This new law bans kids from doing certain things no matter how carefully supervised.
Wasn't trying to make an analogy just a point. People have turned over their kids safety to the government and now the government is going to ride that pony until it drops.
__________________
Remember, when seconds count. . .
the police are just MINUTES away!

Congress has no power to appropriate this money as an act of charity. Every member upon this floor knows it. . .Davy Crockett
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04/25/12, 05:13 PM
springvalley's Avatar
Family Jersey Dairy
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,773
Most laws like this are made up by the ones it doesn`t effect, 98% of the population does not farm. Not sure on the percentage of Americans that homestead, but I`m sure it also is not that large. Some of the very few think they are making things better for children, and have no idea how much children do for family farms and homesteads. Things will start happening in this country one of these days, back certain people into a corner, they will come out fighting. Shot heard round the world will be an understatement. I find it so very hard to believe the good people of this great country of ours have not figured out what is happening, and started to revolt in the streets. It will happen, just when we don`t know, where we don`t know, but it will happen some time. > Thanks and God Bless America > Marc
Cliff and countryfied2011 like this.
__________________
Our Diversified Stock Portfolio: cows and calves, alpacas, horses, pigs, chickens, goats, sheep, cats ... and a couple of dogs...
http://springvalleyfarm.4mg.com
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04/25/12, 05:27 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 5,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by watcher View Post
Wasn't trying to make an analogy just a point. People have turned over their kids safety to the government and now the government is going to ride that pony until it drops.
Ah, got it and I agree.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04/25/12, 05:38 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 3,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by springvalley View Post
Most laws like this are made up by the ones it doesn`t effect, 98% of the population does not farm. Not sure on the percentage of Americans that homestead, but I`m sure it also is not that large. Some of the very few think they are making things better for children, and have no idea how much children do for family farms and homesteads. Things will start happening in this country one of these days, back certain people into a corner, they will come out fighting. Shot heard round the world will be an understatement. I find it so very hard to believe the good people of this great country of ours have not figured out what is happening, and started to revolt in the streets. It will happen, just when we don`t know, where we don`t know, but it will happen some time. > Thanks and God Bless America > Marc
Because the only news a lot of them get is from the mainstream media. But there are more people than you think that know what is going on - I've been surprised just this week by a couple people I've talked to that I would've never thought would've caught on. So the knowledge is spreading and simmering - who knows what will happen next.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 04/25/12, 09:02 PM
BobbyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hondo, TX
Posts: 1,458
I can only imagine how much anyone would learn attending a 90 hour course taught by a federal bureaucrat ..

They could learn more at a 4H play day or a FFA field trip, but, that wont work any mre if this goes thru.
__________________
" Do or do not, there is no try. " - Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 04/25/12, 09:02 PM
City Bound's Avatar
Male
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 5,895
This is just one small step to get food production out of the hands of real people and into the hands of the gov and corporations. If they can control the means of food production they can control the people. It starts small. They chip away what they can until the whole structure is weak, then they can just topple it over.

What is next, kids can not do chores at home? Will it be a crime to make a kid make his bed and clean his room?
Cliff likes this.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 04/25/12, 09:38 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern Great Plains
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff View Post
The proposed legislation has nothing to do with kids at their own home/farm. It's about bringing child labor laws related to operating machinery and handling chemicals for hire on someone else's farm up to the same standary that every other industry is held to. This is not about chores, or learning the farming way of life from your parent/uncle/granfather, that is unaffected.

I can only presume the title and leading lines of the article are purposefully misleading.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 04/25/12, 09:47 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 4,332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonid View Post
The proposed legislation has nothing to do with kids at their own home/farm. It's about bringing child labor laws related to operating machinery and handling chemicals for hire on someone else's farm up to the same standary that every other industry is held to. This is not about chores, or learning the farming way of life from your parent/uncle/granfather, that is unaffected.

I can only presume the title and leading lines of the article are purposefully misleading.
I grew up working on other people's farms. Most of my friends worked on someone else's farms. The kids who had their own farm often got hired by the neighbor to run a baler all night, etc.

And the way I read it, you can't work for your uncle or grandpa, they aren't your parents.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 04/25/12, 10:05 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern Great Plains
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Norman View Post
I grew up working on other people's farms. Most of my friends worked on someone else's farms. The kids who had their own farm often got hired by the neighbor to run a baler all night, etc.

And the way I read it, you can't work for your uncle or grandpa, they aren't your parents.
Unless you were making so much that you felt compelled to file taxes as a kid, and you were considered an "employee", it still wouldn't stop you.

US Labor Department proposes updates to child labor regulations The original new release for the proposal.

Five Facts about the Proposed Child Labor in Agriculture Rule Their answers to the concerned responses to the proposal.

Here's a less inflamatory response to the proposal than the article in the OP.
LisaInN.Idaho likes this.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 AM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture