DNR to Kill Hogs and Small Family Farm Incomes - Page 4 - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Homesteading Questions


Like Tree47Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #61  
Old 04/03/12, 06:35 AM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by ||Downhome|| View Post
Want to regulate hunt clubs fine, think that falls well within the DNR's core mission.
Want to regulate Heritage breed pigs, thats the MDA's job.

No domestic animal is native to Michigan, for that matter most bipeds are not either.

the smart thing to have done would of made stiffer regulations for those that breed for Hunt clubs. One thing I would require is all animals delivered be sterilized. that would solve the problem of breeding on escapes. there a list of other things that could be required of them also.

truth be told all pigs pose a risk, and well you keep harping on wild pigs pay close attention here any pig not contained is a wild pig!

this is very much like the Muscovy duck issue, you have a wild duck and you have a domestic duck. they more or less have the same genetics. when I spoke with the guy listed on the regulation he said we can't differentiate a wild one from a domestic from a feral! we just have to assume they are wild. thats the same approach the DNR has taken.

Callie I will respond back to your reply to my one post when I get it all put together.
its a slight bit complicated. still sifting through the laws. granholm made a few changes prior to leaving,some may effect certain points.

I'm also waiting to see how this plays out.
So, if I’m raising Arkansas Razorback or Russian Wild Hogs, I can call them Heritage Breeds and no one can stop me? Are you saying MDA should allow Russian Wild Hogs and then as they escape, they become DNR’s responsibility? Really?

I agree, it would have been smart to have stiffer regulations on the farms that imported and raised hogs for the hunt clubs. About 200 farms are/were doing that. But, I doubt that the government can regulate you because you sell to Hunt Clubs and leave me alone if I tell you I raise them to butcher myself.

I doubt it would be possible to require spay/neuter. That’s an added expense that only is effective at the Hunt Club. Not acceptable for the Breeders of Wild Hogs. I thought if everyone raising Wild Hogs were to implant a microchip, then when they are found on the loose, the owner could be fined to cover some of the eradication costs. But all that does is create more regulation, more cost to farmers and doesn’t stop the problem.

People have imported hundreds of Wild Hogs, bred them, increased their populations a hundred fold and allowed thousands to escape. All to provide a target for someone that won’t hunt, but wants to kill something, cheaply. DNR and MDA have been directed by the Legislature to put a stop to this nonsense.

Domestic pigs could pose a risk if they were to establish breeding populations across the state. They haven’t. Wild Hogs, from imported Wild Hogs have established breeding populations across the state. Some Wild Hogs carry psudorabies, domestic hogs do not.
Feral pig is any pig living off the farm. Wild Hog is a non-domesticated pig, like Razorback or Russian Hog.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 04/03/12, 06:40 AM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherry in Iowa View Post
Even the homesteader wants FERAL hogs to be shot. We are talking about the DNR coming onto a guys woven/electric fenced homestead and shooting hogs that are raised for their MEAT and LARD. They live in pastures. They do not go out in the wild and tear things up. This is what people are missing..backyard hogs..no matter what the breed..in Michigan..can be shot on April 1st and you will not be compensated.

Paragraph from Baker's website this morning.:

We spent the day in Lansing today. Mark testified before the Senate Ag Committee. He was able to reinforce the fact that “feral” is not an animal we feed everyday, that this isn’t about a breed of hog but rather about an agency overstepping their bounds. The DNR had no business usurping the legislature’s authority by writing law and dictating farm policy. The legislature has done it’s job. There are several legislators who really understood before or as a result of Mark’s testimony that the ISO and Declatory Ruling are an overreach on the DNR’s part. Feral animals do not exist, by definition, on a farm under a farmer’s care. The DNR, in concert with the MI Pork Producers, MI Milk Producers Association, and Agribusiness, among others, has spread disinformation and has employed the largest lobbying firm in Lansing to influence votes. We have documents and personally observed this. However, the Declatory Ruling can’t just be changed. It has to be repealed. Despite great pressure, the DNR is not accountable or responsive to citizens. The governor alone can keep the DNR on their side of the fence.
Please provide your source:"has employed the largest lobbying firm in Lansing to influence votes."
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 04/03/12, 06:47 AM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Callieslamb View Post
I think comparing hogs to dexters is bit of a stretch. How many farmers in MI raise feral pigs by the MDNR's definition? Mi already doesn't want backyard milk cows. Or at least, they don't want you to make the milk available to others. I didn't see that definition on the MDNR site as feral being one that is raised outside. It is already legal for a farmer to shoot any feral pig found on his property.
I agree with you that eliminating wild hogs doesn't mean Dexters will be next. That was a stretch. But saying Mi government is against backyard milk cows is also a big stretch, too. Plus it adds an emotional issue to an already complex emootional Wild Hog issue. You didn't see anything about ferel equalling being raised outside because it isn't there. That is just a part of the stiring the pot misinformation going on by Baker and others.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 04/03/12, 06:57 AM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherry in Iowa View Post
Confinement breeds have had the ability to live outside bred out of them. They are genetically "built" to stand on cement and have their every needs met. The genetics of the outside living hogs is just the opposite. Did you read the links? Did you watch even one video of Baker talking about where the rub is on his hogs vs feral hogs?

I can honestly say I am not hysterical..lol. The ONLY reason I posted this thread is because we are nearing a dead-line. If I can in some small way make a little wave or a little noise and it helps them..I'm gonna try to do it. Know why? Because WE .. here on this little homestead .. would want to have someone standing up for us in a similar situation. Heck, we don't own or eat hogs of ANY kind.
I'm afraid that while you feel you are doing something noble, you may be making it harder for homesteaders to homestead. If the population of ferel Wild Hogs continues to increase, small farmers won't be able to grow market gardens without the expense of secure fences and guard dogs. We won't be able to keep the pastures growing and the woodlots healthy. These are a damaging pest. I think your concern is mis-directed.
By permitting others to raise Wild Hogs, while we know many escape and continue to breed, you are increasing the odds that other crops will be damaged. Michigan is in the top 5 states for fruit and vegetable production. You want us to risk Michigan's 70 billion dollar Agriculture so some dufus can shoot a Wild Hog? Doesn't seem worth the risk to me.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 04/03/12, 07:02 AM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeRock View Post
The Invasive Species Order was issued last year. It is going to be enforced on April 1.

I personally know a pig farmer raising Russian boars for sale to private hunting clubs that was put out of business by this order. He was given a deadline of April 1 to have all his stock disposed of. Last I knew he was negotiating a sale to an out of state buyer.

Unless you can provide a link to an official Michigan government website with newer information I think this a rehash of dated information.
So the guy got into the Wild Hog business, was given a year's notice to get them sold to a Hunt Club because they were stopping this Invasive Species, but he failed to do that and must sell out of state?

Agriculture, like everything else has Fads. He got in on a Fad. He'll have to get a new Fad. But he should have sold last year when he had the opportunity. The other states are finding out what a problem these pests are.

It is old information, just the deadline is here.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 04/03/12, 07:04 AM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pony View Post
The DNR has and will continue to destroy herds of any animal they choose to eliminate. This isn't about protecting natural resources: It's about more money in the pockets of big agri-business.

Don't have time right now to google it, but go check it out. They have overstepped their bounds many times, and unless we stand up for those who are being trampled now, our turn will come eventually.

"First they came for the Jews, but I did not worry because I am not a Jew...."
Please provide an example: "The DNR has and will continue to destroy herds of any animal they choose to eliminate."
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 04/03/12, 07:08 AM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by ||Downhome|| View Post
I'm actually be surprised if someone don't just cut their losses by cutting a bunch loose?
I think some (many?) already have.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 04/03/12, 07:21 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,701
Quote:
Originally Posted by haypoint View Post
Please provide your source:"has employed the largest lobbying firm in Lansing to influence votes."
I don't think I understand your question. That was from Baker's website. I believe it was Jill Baker updating last week.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 04/03/12, 07:34 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,701
Quote:
Originally Posted by haypoint View Post
I'm afraid that while you feel you are doing something noble, you may be making it harder for homesteaders to homestead. If the population of ferel Wild Hogs continues to increase, small farmers won't be able to grow market gardens without the expense of secure fences and guard dogs. We won't be able to keep the pastures growing and the woodlots healthy. These are a damaging pest. I think your concern is mis-directed.
By permitting others to raise Wild Hogs, while we know many escape and continue to breed, you are increasing the odds that other crops will be damaged. Michigan is in the top 5 states for fruit and vegetable production. You want us to risk Michigan's 70 billion dollar Agriculture so some dufus can shoot a Wild Hog? Doesn't seem worth the risk to me.
I think you play with the term "Wild Hogs". If they are wild, the ranchers themselves have no problem with the DNR getting rid of them. The hogs that this particular farmer (Baker) is raising is NOT a wild hog. They are domesticated and behind fences. They are well taken care of and causing no problems. Again, Baker's hogs are not wild.

It's a pretty long stretch on your part to blame me or my article on making things tougher for homesteaders. Since when are opinions off limits to homesteaders? You certainly have no problem voicing what you think.

I believe you intentionally misrepresent the terms "wild hogs" and "feral hogs". As for my analogy with the Dexters..I don't have heritage hogs or any hogs. But if the DNR can do this to those who do..they can do almost anything they deem is proper.

Plenty of homesteaders are fighting with the government over their milk cows and the right to sell it. Dexters are a dual, in some cases triple, use homesteading kind of cattle breed. They did not originate in America. They are being milked. Why wouldn't I worry that if the DNR can pass this hog hurdle, it would certainly give them confidence to go after something I care about?
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 04/03/12, 07:56 AM
arabian knight's Avatar
Miniature Horse lover
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Central WI.
Posts: 21,244
Thats a nightly long stretch to think that this hog deal can go over and relate to cattle not oriented in this country. Which there are many many breeds. That is just not going to happen at all. And living in Iowa, not having any hogs, and worrying about something as this in MI. Hmm. There are many other things that are a lot higher on a list to worry about and this is so far at the bottom it is even in the running.

Last edited by arabian knight; 04/03/12 at 07:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 04/03/12, 08:48 AM
michiganfarmer's Avatar
Max
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Near Traverse City Michigan
Posts: 6,560
I dont understand all the details, but any law the prohibits any responsible animal husbandry it just wrong.
__________________
http://lownfamilymaplesyrup.com/ max@lownfamilymaplesyrup.com
Professional Tool. 1220 Woodmere Ave,Traverse City, MI. 49686. 231-941-8003. http://professionaltool.com/
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 04/03/12, 09:37 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,701
Quote:
Originally Posted by arabian knight View Post
Thats a nightly long stretch to think that this hog deal can go over and relate to cattle not oriented in this country. Which there are many many breeds. That is just not going to happen at all. And living in Iowa, not having any hogs, and worrying about something as this in MI. Hmm. There are many other things that are a lot higher on a list to worry about and this is so far at the bottom it is even in the running.
Wow..you are so special. I can't tell ya how much I've learned from your responses on this thread. Thank you .. thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 04/03/12, 10:04 AM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganfarmer View Post
I dont understand all the details, but any law the prohibits any responsible animal husbandry it just wrong.
There are two threads going on this topic on HT. Feel free to review it. Then go to the DNR website and see what they are really doing.

Sadly, hundreds of folks have not been responsible husbandrymen. hundreds of Wild Hogs have been allowed to escape into the woods, fields, pastures and lawns of others.

So, for very little benifit, supplying Hunt Clubs with a cheap shoot, the citizens of this state face increasing damage to our natural resources.

This isn't a law against responsible animal husbandry, it is a law against raising an animal that has shown itself to be very difficult to keep in an enclosure/fence, for a limited benifit of a few inept hunters.

When this all shakes out, people will see that sombody's woolly pigs aren't the target of a government gone mad killing spree. But, in the mean time, it is fun to pretend.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 04/03/12, 10:13 AM
michiganfarmer's Avatar
Max
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Near Traverse City Michigan
Posts: 6,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by haypoint View Post
There are two threads going on this topic on HT. Feel free to review it. Then go to the DNR website and see what they are really doing.

Sadly, hundreds of folks have not been responsible husbandrymen. hundreds of Wild Hogs have been allowed to escape into the woods, fields, pastures and lawns of others.

So, for very little benifit, supplying Hunt Clubs with a cheap shoot, the citizens of this state face increasing damage to our natural resources.

This isn't a law against responsible animal husbandry, it is a law against raising an animal that has shown itself to be very difficult to keep in an enclosure/fence, for a limited benifit of a few inept hunters.

When this all shakes out, people will see that sombody's woolly pigs aren't the target of a government gone mad killing spree. But, in the mean time, it is fun to pretend.
My opinion hasnt changed. Any person who is containing their animals should be exempt. Problem people should be dealt with. People who arent a problem should be left alone.
||Downhome|| likes this.
__________________
http://lownfamilymaplesyrup.com/ max@lownfamilymaplesyrup.com
Professional Tool. 1220 Woodmere Ave,Traverse City, MI. 49686. 231-941-8003. http://professionaltool.com/
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 04/03/12, 10:15 AM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherry in Iowa View Post
I think you play with the term "Wild Hogs". If they are wild, the ranchers themselves have no problem with the DNR getting rid of them. The hogs that this particular farmer (Baker) is raising is NOT a wild hog. They are domesticated and behind fences. They are well taken care of and causing no problems. Again, Baker's hogs are not wild.

It's a pretty long stretch on your part to blame me or my article on making things tougher for homesteaders. Since when are opinions off limits to homesteaders? You certainly have no problem voicing what you think.

I believe you intentionally misrepresent the terms "wild hogs" and "feral hogs". As for my analogy with the Dexters..I don't have heritage hogs or any hogs. But if the DNR can do this to those who do..they can do almost anything they deem is proper.

Plenty of homesteaders are fighting with the government over their milk cows and the right to sell it. Dexters are a dual, in some cases triple, use homesteading kind of cattle breed. They did not originate in America. They are being milked. Why wouldn't I worry that if the DNR can pass this hog hurdle, it would certainly give them confidence to go after something I care about?
No, I think I'm clear on Wild Hogs. Feral hogs are hogs on the loose, either Razorbacks or Duroc. Wild Hogs are Russian Wild Hogs, eurasia Wild Hogs, Razorbacks and a bunch of never domesticated, non-commercial hogs. This isn't meant to include commercial breeds from a hundred years ago, those are Heritage breeds. But, with that said, if you are crossing any breed with Wild Hogs, plan a BBQ, 'cause those hogs are not going to be allowed in MI.

You try to paint a pictture of the government going after Wild Hogs and then they'll go after cattle. There just aren't any dots to connect to your belief.

DNR isn't out to limit homesteader options and once the Russian Wild Hogs are gone they are going after your Dexters and then your children.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 04/03/12, 10:31 AM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganfarmer View Post
My opinion hasnt changed. Any person who is containing their animals should be exempt. Problem people should be dealt with. People who arent a problem should be left alone.
Hunt Clubs haven't been responsable. They generally have many miles of deer fence and haven't been able to contain those Wild Hog species. So, that business practice has proven to pose a danger to MI natural resorces and has been shut down. All were given a chance to complets all their hunts to get rid of these pests.

People that are raising Wild Hogs for the hunt clubs were notified all along the way. Most have allowed hogs to escape from their fenced areas.

It is very difficult to keep Wild Hogs inside a fence. Once they escape, it has been difficult to prevent breeding polulations from forming in the wild.

To wait until the Wild Hogs have escaped, then try to do something is a plan that has proven not to work. Once the Wild Hogs are on the loose, how do you insure who the owner is? Second and third generation? How are you going to document that a raiser of Razorbacks did or didn't have a few escape? How are you going to get enough money from the owner of escaped Russian Wild Hogs to cover the years of eradication efforts it takes? I resent the introduction of this invasive hog into this state and the cost in lost crop yield and forest land distruction.

You just can not tell someone that as long as they keep their Wild hogs in their fence that they can raise them, after seeing nearly all of the 200+ Wild Hog and Hunt Clubs lost their Wild Hogs.

IMHO the DNR isn't after Baker's hogs and that Baker is a kook. But when that is proven, the frenzy will have passed.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 04/03/12, 10:45 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 690
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherry in Iowa; Plenty of homesteaders are fighting with the government over their milk cows and the right to sell it. Dexters are a dual, in some cases triple, use homesteading kind of cattle breed. They did not originate in America. They are being milked. Why wouldn't I worry that if the DNR can pass this hog hurdle, it would certainly give them confidence to go after something [B
I[/B] care about?
Well,I don't know of anywhere in Iowa or Michigan that wild herds of feral cows are destroying native forests, native wildlife habitat or crops of farmers. That is where this issue started.
Wanda likes this.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 04/03/12, 10:56 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 359
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMA1 View Post
Well,I don't know of anywhere in Iowa or Michigan that wild herds of feral cows are destroying native forests, native wildlife habitat or crops of farmers. That is where this issue started.
Dunno about native wildlife and forests, but aren't the farmers' crops the farmers' responsibility?

It is legal to shoot an unfenced pig wherever it is found. Given that this is the case, I don't really see that farmers need any more government intervention in protecting their investment. Once the government is out of the way, why should they have to do anything else?

The same thing goes if you are worried about pseudo-rabies in your CAFO - you are free to shoot any feral hogs you find in your swine barn.

Maybe I'm just being too conservative and anti-nanny-state....

Last edited by Beowulf; 04/03/12 at 10:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 04/03/12, 11:20 AM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beowulf View Post
Dunno about native wildlife and forests, but aren't the farmers' crops the farmers' responsibility?

It is legal to shoot an unfenced pig wherever it is found. Given that this is the case, I don't really see that farmers need any more government intervention in protecting their investment. Once the government is out of the way, why should they have to do anything else?

The same thing goes if you are worried about pseudo-rabies in your CAFO - you are free to shoot any feral hogs you find in your swine barn.

Maybe I'm just being too conservative and anti-nanny-state....
You expect the government to regulate the waste from a CAFO so they don't damage nearby property and streams aand shut them down if it does, but when people import an invassive animal that "spills " out onto the property of others, you expect the violated person to correct the problem?

What if a factory was polluting the air and i told you that you could have all the clean air you want, but you have to eliminate the factory's polution first? Crazy?

Raising Wild Hogs has created problems that run far into the future. Controling the current breeding populations that have already escaped from these Exotic Wild Hog breeding operations is costing taxpayer's money. Allowing them to continue is good money after bad.

I guess if there were a requirement that created an absoloutely escape-proof containment, I'd reconsider. But the reality is that no one raising Wild Hogs for sport would make such an investment in security.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 04/03/12, 11:33 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 359
Quote:
Originally Posted by haypoint View Post
You expect the government to regulate the waste from a CAFO so they don't damage nearby property and streams aand shut them down if it does, but when people import an invassive animal that "spills " out onto the property of others, you expect the violated person to correct the problem?

What if a factory was polluting the air and i told you that you could have all the clean air you want, but you have to eliminate the factory's polution first? Crazy?

Raising Wild Hogs has created problems that run far into the future. Controling the current breeding populations that have already escaped from these Exotic Wild Hog breeding operations is costing taxpayer's money. Allowing them to continue is good money after bad.

I guess if there were a requirement that created an absoloutely escape-proof containment, I'd reconsider. But the reality is that no one raising Wild Hogs for sport would make such an investment in security.
I would expect everyone to take care of their own affairs.

1: Require tagging/tatooing for *all* swine.
2: Kill any untagged swine as "feral."
3: Hold the owner for any tagged swine killed off property financially liable.

Killing domestic hogs will do nothing to control feral populations.
||Downhome|| likes this.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 PM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture