Who has first hand EXPERIENCE with fracking? - Page 3 - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Homesteading Questions


Like Tree13Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #41  
Old 02/12/12, 09:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,143
First off, if you are in Ohio it is almost certain that they are going for Utica/Point Pleasant formations, not Marcellus. You can go look at the well permits in Ohio on the ODNR website if you don't believe me.

I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with Michael Smith - well pads are running about 3-5 acres excluding any access roads. Also, active drill rig count for NG has fallen off substantially. Rigs are being moved from PA to Ohio to take advantage of the wet gas/Oil play areas in Ohio. Where your 14.5 acres is located will dictate the amount of interest in your property. My sense is that competition for leases has slowed down quite a bit. Peak offers that I am aware of were $5,800/acre signing bonus and 20% gross royalties. CHK has publicly stated that the amount they are devoting to leasing is dropping by (roughly) 75%. My hunch is that there will be some consolidation among various palyers. REXX just did a $70 million share sale because their credit lines were being tightened.

You can always insist on a subsurface lease only as a condition of leasing. 14.5 acres is not much and if need be they will bypass you unless you are right in the way of where they want to go. They have to stay 500 feet off the property line of unleased property and with tight shale formations they are NOT going to suck the gas out from under your property.

If you have questions I suggest you go to gomarcellusshale.com.

Hope this helps.

Mike
  #42  
Old 02/12/12, 09:26 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wanderer0101 View Post
I'm as green as they come but fortunately I've got the experience and background to know the truth. The "sky is falling" crowd is just having a field day with this stuff.

I fracked my first well neary 37 years ago. Almost all this negative stuff you read is just anti-energy propaganda, a lot of it is completely bogus and some of it deliberately so. There are no documented cases of fracking contaminating drinking water. More than 95% of what's traditionally been pumped when fracking is just sand and water, less than 1% is of any concern at all. It all gets pumped into zones that are thousands of feet away from drinking water aquifers and modern technology can track where the actual cracks are going in real time. Modern frack fluids are available that consist entirely of food grade products, you can drink the stuff.

If there is a problem it lies with well contruction, poor casing design or poor cement jobs, which can be a problem with any oil or gas well. With current scrutiny that's becoming pretty rare.

Take the lease and royalty money and enjoy it.
A well can, and does, have thousands of gallons of toxic chemicals pumped into the frack fluid. Here in PA. the chemicals are not disclosed as it's a "trade secret". In reality they don't want to disclose that which can be directly pinned on the polluter, once the ground water is destroyed. There a plenty of cases of contaminated wells currently in our state, and the EPA stepped in to break up the criminally tight relationship that the state's DEP seems to have developed with the drillers. Now the drillers no longer pretend to be cleaning fracking waste by running it thorugh municipal waste water treatment plants that are not designed to process toxic waste, and discharge the radioactive and carcinogenic toxins into our steams, sometimes upstream of other municipalities fresh water intakes. The drillers are finding it harder to avoid dealing with the wells they pollute and are no longer getting a free pass from the state. Fracking is a disaster. Air and water pollution become major issues. Traffic explodes in rural areas, some places in rural PA. see traffic accidents at rates several times higher than before the circus came to town. The OP need to head east to the northern tier counties of PA. Spend some time meeting locals and asking how their lives improved? A few got quite wealthy, many got a lot less than promised. Most wish it it never happened.
PrettyPaisley likes this.

Last edited by wr; 07/01/13 at 02:58 PM.
  #43  
Old 02/12/12, 10:20 PM
texican's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carthage, Texas
Posts: 12,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by idigbeets View Post
Phew, I was worried posting in this thread that all the ANTI's would be in it... thanks for sharing some of your real life stories everyone !
I haven't got a problem with folks being anti oil and gas... who want's to find their little slice of heaven, and then have it muddled up by o&g exploration. However, I do get an internal giggle about folks being hypocrites.... when they complain about oil, but couldn't exist without it. As much as I'd like the world to find a new energy source, we're not going to get off oil anytime soon. Most of us exist because we live in the Age of Oil. If it were shut off tomorrow, we'd very quickly revert back to population levels below those prior to the Age of Oil.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fordy View Post
............ When they frac a well on this ranch where I work , they can and do frac into existing wells up to a mile away . Chesapeake , Devon , et al , know that a frac job has the potential too create problems for productive wells a goodly distance from the well bore being fraced . It happens all the time and they just do whatever too get those affected wells back into production .
.............You'd think folks with minerals wanting to lease said minerals would hire a competent Landman\Atty too proof read any lease prior to signing so their land and water was fully protected but some are penny wise and lease stupid . , fordy
There you go.... if only everyone knew what a landman/atty did, and they all went out and hired them to wrassle with their interests. It's always a sad day when I have to request payment before delivering the final research report...... because someone screwed the pooch and tried to negotiate their own interests instead of hiring a professional.... and they find out they lost everything... didn't retain minerals, didn't sign a 'lease', but a mineral deed, etc. Where they should be making tens of thousands a month, they got diddly. Unfortunately you can't see minerals... and by the time folks realize they're not in possession of everything they thought they did, it's too late!
__________________
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. Seneca
Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival. W. Edwards Deming
  #44  
Old 02/13/12, 07:46 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,448
Quote:
Originally Posted by wharton View Post
A well can, and does, have thousands of gallons of toxic chemicals pumped into the frack fluid. Here in PA. the chemicals are not disclosed as it's a "trade secret". In reality they don't want to disclose that which can be directly pinned on the polluter, once the ground water is destroyed. There a plenty of cases of contaminated wells currently in our state, and the EPA stepped in to break up the criminally tight relationship that the state's DEP seems to have developed with the drillers. Now the drillers no longer pretend to be cleaning fracking waste by running it thorugh municipal waste water treatment plants that are not designed to process toxic waste, and discharge the radioactive and carcinogenic toxins into our steams, sometimes upstream of other municipalities fresh water intakes. The drillers are finding it harder to avoid dealing with the wells they pollute and are no longer getting a free pass from the state. Fracking is a disaster. Air and water pollution become major issues. Traffic explodes in rural areas, some places in rural PA. see traffic accidents at rates several times higher than before the circus came to town. The OP need to head east to the northern tier counties of PA. Spend some time meeting locals and asking how their lives improved? A few got quite wealthy, many got a lot less than promised. Most wish it it never happened.
Congratulations, you've got the propaganda down pat. And once again you demonstrate that the facts just don't matter to a certain agenda driven segment of the population.

Last edited by wr; 07/01/13 at 02:59 PM.
  #45  
Old 02/13/12, 11:42 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alice In TX/MO View Post
Texas has never had earthquakes. Wrong.

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquak...as/history.php
Yup I can show you an active fault line that you can walk up and see that crosses all the way through Houston.. Its easy to see in older places like Ellington AFB where runs across the road, and all the way up to the N side where it runs through folks back yards up off memorial drive where they have crack about 8" wide spanning the whole back yard.
  #46  
Old 02/13/12, 03:19 PM
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tx
Posts: 1,442
OK, sorry. I guess I should be more specific and say no earthquakes in my part of TX. It's a big state. I never felt an earthquake in Dallas before. The quakes listed in the first article were either in far west TX or near the border in OK or LA. Only 2 of the earthquakes listed in that article have occurred since my Birth and they were 400 and 600 miles away. The largest was a 4.5. And Houston is 250 miles away.

Last edited by Buffy in Dallas; 02/13/12 at 03:24 PM.
  #47  
Old 02/19/12, 05:46 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 180




  #48  
Old 02/19/12, 11:35 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 8,287
I guess they had better frackers in Co Or maybe i wasn't where i thought i was doing what i thought i was . O well the pay was great i know i got that .
__________________
Check it Out O added another Plank With O care
http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist...to-Planks.html
  #49  
Old 02/19/12, 11:52 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 4,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by pheasantplucker View Post
I live in an area where the Marcellus Shale Deposit runs beneath us. I have around 14.5 acres...about half timber and half meadow. Fairly hilly. Lots of deer, turkey. This has been my dream. My wife and I built a 24 x 28 Lincoln log cabin on it. Problem is...everyone in our valley is getting worked up to lease their mineral rights to one of three companies who are dangling the dollars in front of everyone. I realize the economy is tough and many of these folks have been without work for a while. I do not blame people who opt to lease their mineral rights, but I am not on board with this. I am afraid (after the BP mess last year) that energy companies will say anything and assure people up one side and down the other, but that this is not anything that will be good for the land. Right now, the fracking company that everyone seems most pumped up about is offering land owners $5,000 per acre with a share of 20% of the value of gas they pull up to be awarded as ongoing dividends...(for purposes of simplified math)...If, say the company pulls 200 units of gas out of the well, 20% would equal 40 units. Let's say there were 500 landowner acres who signed on with this well, and I was one holding 15 acres...that would be 3% of the share...and thus 3% of the 40 units would afford me about 1.2 units as my take. This all sounds fine and dandy, until you read about all the undisclosed chemical residue that they use in their process, and you learn about the noise and dirt created, the constant rumble of trucks, etc. I hear the energy company painting a rosey picture about how great it is, and I hear from folks who think it's terrible. I'm sure it's somewhere in between. I'd like to hear from YOU if YOU have fracking going on in your area. What has been your experience? Have you seen spills? Deer and other wildlife been negatively impacted? If you are "on board" with a company which practices fracking..Did they live up to your expectations and are you getting what you expected as far as money? I'm seriously considering selling my cabin and land with timber and mineral rights and not have to be involved with this whole thing. I love my place an d I have wonderful neighbors...it would pain me to give up what my wife and I have worked for, but I don't want to be here if it all goes wrong. Fill me in, will you?
Article about fracking...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2848415/posts


.
__________________
If your presence can't add value to my life your absence will make no difference...



(名)三位一體; 三個一組; 三人一組
.
  #50  
Old 07/01/13, 05:55 AM
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 1,300
GasLand - Watch

Just been watching the documentary GasLand. Sure am hoping what is depicted is VERY RARE, or we are all in big trouble! We can live without gas or oil (although it would be a bit rough), but we can not live without water. And good water is already being used up in many other ways. And I am not an environmental activist BTW, in fact one could say I am a "conservative" politically. You can watch this documentary on Netflix (streaming) or you can watch on YouTube below:

  #51  
Old 07/01/13, 06:35 AM
willow_girl's Avatar
Very Dairy
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dysfunction Junction
Posts: 14,603
Here in Washington Co., PA, we're surrounded by gas and oil development. There is a junction station right across the road from our house (which is set back only 30 feet or so from the road). Trucks are in and out of there frequently, which drives our dogs crazy, and I suppose if I had a mind to be annoyed by it, I could be, but generally I don't pay much attention to it.
lemonthyme7 likes this.
__________________
"I love all of this mud," said no one, ever.
  #52  
Old 07/01/13, 12:14 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The Netherlands, EU
Posts: 57
i just want to ad my 2 cents. (I agree with texican on the you are more or less forced to join for insurance reasons standpoint)

Not to long ago a big Dutch bank announced not to lend to companies (or farmers) involved in fracking:
http://www.rtcc.org/rabobank-no-money-for-fracking/
This stroke me as premature, for the discussion in the Netherlands on fracking.

The Rabobank doenst specify a reason other then that farmers should be able to produce save food products.

A search for recent scientific papers gave one result that was interesting enough to read:
http://www.archive.org/stream/Impact...press_djvu.txt

Seems to me fracking doest do to much damage on the short term. Things seem to go bad when the waste water goes into the environment. (And it might not even be the fracking fluids that do the damage but the stuff from the shale layer)

Henk
  #53  
Old 07/01/13, 12:32 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,448
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelZ View Post
Just been watching the documentary GasLand. Sure am hoping what is depicted is VERY RARE, or we are all in big trouble! We can live without gas or oil (although it would be a bit rough), but we can not live without water. And good water is already being used up in many other ways. And I am not an environmental activist BTW, in fact one could say I am a "conservative" politically. You can watch this documentary on Netflix (streaming) or you can watch on YouTube below:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96AEzQYangE
GasLand is essentially a lie from beginning to end and has been widely discredited by pretty much everyone with at least half a brain that knows anything about the subject. It's not a documentary, it's propaganda from the enviro-nazi equivalent of Joseph Goebbels.
Irish Pixie likes this.
  #54  
Old 07/01/13, 02:04 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 888
Gasland 2 is about to be released, I look forward to seeing it eventually.
  #55  
Old 07/01/13, 06:50 PM
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 1,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wanderer0101 View Post
GasLand is essentially a lie from beginning to end and has been widely discredited by pretty much everyone with at least half a brain that knows anything about the subject. It's not a documentary, it's propaganda from the enviro-nazi equivalent of Joseph Goebbels.
Hope you are right, cause otherwise we could face some serious problems. If it is as you say, they sure did a good job of falsely portraying all the info.
  #56  
Old 07/01/13, 07:30 PM
arabian knight's Avatar
Miniature Horse lover
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Central WI.
Posts: 21,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wanderer0101 View Post
GasLand is essentially a lie from beginning to end and has been widely discredited by pretty much everyone with at least half a brain that knows anything about the subject. It's not a documentary, it's propaganda from the enviro-nazi equivalent of Joseph Goebbels.
Yup you got that right. Fracing has been around for many years. Just that now they can drill horizontal and get more oil out of the same well.
And around here "Sand Mining" to help supply the oil industry is Big.
Course the sane mined here has many uses other then just for the oil side of things. From road beds to even making glass, ALL comes from these Sand Mines.
__________________
Oh my, dishes yet to wash and dry

See My Pictures at
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/0903/arabianknight/
  #57  
Old 07/01/13, 08:37 PM
littlejoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,836
No doubt there is a lot of false and misleading information out there concerning fracking. I don't really have huge concerns with it. Methane gas is prevalent in this area, even in water wells, and no fracking has taken place here. I've been involved with water wells (locally) since I was a pup, but my knowledge of the industry is pretty limited.

I spent last fall and early winter in the Bakkens working for a hot oil outfit. The first four weeks being trained as a hot oiler, and the rest on a bobtail frac heater. Money was good, and actually the job was the easiest I've ever had...if you liked driving on roads that could be bad, icy, foggy, and with heavy traffic. That's one reason I left, plus I just don't like driving. The other...it is the most corrupt place I've ever been. And I havn't been much anywhere.

We did work on frac sites, and those were very professional people in my limited experience. I had chances to visit with the company men, and they were very competent. The established wells were sites where I found willy-nilly people. Chemicals (anti-corrosion, mostly) would be spilled, or a valve left open, or something else? It was just hushed up, and covered up.

In one instance EPA had actually been on site, where a string of pipe had been dropped and a well came alive. I doubt there would be any ill effects from some oil on the ground, but the cleanup was a farce! For the most part, no EPA, no anyone to be held accountable too, except the company man. How many dollars traded hands to keep EPA at a distance in most instances, I have no idea?

No safety training for the job, but you signed off for it? Common sense and a small understanding of pressures and pumps will go a long ways, but some had neither, and some sites you went to, you never knew what you were heating with a frac heater? They'd give you a list of tanks and tell you (supposedly) what was in them. You learned to crack a valve and check. Different fluids heat differently, and heated oil is very volatile! One dummy could make a simple job dangerous, and money attracts all.

I'm not pro or con, but anyplace where a lot of money is represented is going to be a place with lots of corruption. It felt like the industry was raping the area to me!

I left it, and hope not to go back to witness anymore. If there are no rains, I'll have to seek employment elsewhere to keep my dream alive. In a way, I'm glad it's there, and not in my backyard.
vicker likes this.
  #58  
Old 07/01/13, 08:53 PM
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Corpus Christi, TX/Williston, ND
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by fordy View Post
.....................No one appreciates the drilling and production Bizz more than I do , and I happen to know a little more than the average JOE about the process and procedure of fracking ! They use diesel fuel , HYdrochloric ACID , salt brine water and other chemicals that have NO business in any source of potable water !
.....................The very idea that 'they' don't have any screwups when fracking at 5,000 to 10,000 psi and 50 barrels a minute is pure poppycock !!!!! There are mistakes made but they're never acknowledged , only paid for ! Too assert that ALL frack jobs go as planned is only Postulated by someone with Silly Putty for Brains and Contrary to Murphy's Law .
......................Drilling companies can and do log the cement jobs after they set their casing , and they KNOW , IF , VOIDS exist where the cement did NOT fill in and around the pipe as it should , unfortunately frack fluid being pumped at high pressure and high volume will do as it pleases . , fordy



This post is filled with inaccuracies. If the cement bond is bad they go squeeze it. "Screw ups" happen. But there are at least 3 barriers between the frac string and any water potable sources. Fracing isn't done in water zones. There are usually thousands of feet of formation between pay zones and fresh water.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
__________________
There is only one certain barrier to truth, the conviction that you already have it- Unknown
  #59  
Old 07/01/13, 10:28 PM
littlejoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,836
No DUDE, I'm no expert nor did I ever feel as such. Just saying what I saw from my perspective! There is no training or safety training, if you can breathe you've got a job. THe buck never stops, just keeps getting passed!
vicker likes this.

Last edited by wr; 07/02/13 at 10:31 PM. Reason: Rude comment deleted
  #60  
Old 07/02/13, 09:38 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 888
Another aspect of this debate that may have been mentioned by the producer of Gasland & GL2 in an interview I saw recently is that there's a problem with any line of thinking that since using methane to replace coal and/or oil in burning applications doesn't produce CO2, there's a lot of room for other problems since that greenhouse gas release isn't happening. Problem is that methane is around 9X as intense a heat trapping effect as CO2 AND there's typically over 10% (I seem to recall up to 17% leakage being cited) incidental loss of methane into the atmosphere from fracking to pipelines to valves going from one container to another. Hence, there well may be a net *increase* in greenhouse gas pollution effect by converting to natural gas.

OK, so reduce leakage with better design and regulation requirements. That reduces profits and the lines of thinking that I follow say that the overhead on oil and methane extraction is already so high, with rapid depletions after a year or two in even the best gas hits, that investment capital is getting hard to find, that the bottom line returns to initial capital are discouraging even now. Some fifteen years back, a friend involved in oil drilling investments got me into a small share ($12K or so) in one Texas horizontal-drilling exploration operation. Here's a YouTube set in a much more recent situation but it pretty well presents how that speculation went for me:
Closed Thread




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 PM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture