Evaluate A Car Purchase , Subaru WRX..... - Page 2 - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Homesteading Questions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 12/11/11, 06:02 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Whiskey Flats(Ft. Worth) , Tx
Posts: 8,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramblin Wreck View Post
I bought a 2010 Forrester (non turbo) for a lot less than the price being asked for your WRX. It doesn't have the HP of the turbo version, but it gets me where I want to go fine. It's my understanding that the tubo gets a little less MPG, and I think it requires premium fuel (not positive about that).

The Forrester got me around the country on a 10K hiking/canoeing/camping road trip this past Summer. It pulled a pop up camper and got me down some roads I'm not sure my GMC 4x4 truck could have navigated. I've got 25K miles on the car, and its never been in for any warranty work. My MPG is usually around 27/28 with a 5 speed manual trannie.

Subaru just announced a major recall for 2012 models due to a problem with brake master cylinders. For whatever reason, the Forrester was not included in the recall.
..................Thanks for your input . , fordy
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12/12/11, 07:29 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 704
Subarus are far from extremely reliable cars. They have a recent history of wheel bearing failures, head issues, frequent strut replacements, water pumps falling apart inside the motor and other problems.They also have a well deserve reputation for consuming a lot of tires and fuel. This particular model is extremely high performance, has much higher insurance rates (for some buyers) and hardly a bargain.

I spend time on another forum where a member owns an independent repair shop in Vermont, where Subarus are a cult car. He marvels at the fact that many of his customers will spend $4,000 on repairs by the time the car has 150K on the odometer, yet still remain fiercely loyal to a brand that really isn't too impressive. (but rewards him with a steady source of income)

We currently have a newer CRV in our small fleet of vehicles. It had a minor computer glitch when it was new, and needed a light bulb replaced at the end of the warranty period. Like every other Honda we owned ,I fully expect it to provide ten years and 250,000 miles of service with little more than thoughful maintenance. We drove a new Forester at the time we purchased the CRV. I was shocked to say the least. The interior was real current, assuming it was 1985, and we were sitting in a $5000 base model car. Add a rough ride and the trademark tractor sound of the boxer motor, and the wife had zero interest in a Subaru.

On the issue of ANY car with a turbo. There is no way that it will be as reliable as a non-turbo car. Ask any independent mechanic with some experience. They have nothing in common with a big truck turbo. They are a tiny fraction of the size, and spin twice as fast. They stress the other engine components, require additional, complex control systems, create a lot of damaging heat in the engine compartment, and require the owner to be very dedicated to a rigid schedule of oil changes with high dollar synthetic.

We currently have five vehicles on the road, and log 80-90K a year total, so there is a bit of experience behind my opinion. We have been through a few Subarus, a few turbos and well over a million miles so far.

There are far better choices available in new vehicles at this time. A WRX is basically a street legal road rally race car, and a particularly poor choice given the general mindset of the members here.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12/12/11, 07:53 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 1,495
I just gotta ask too fordy, feel free to ignore this.. but you're buying a Subaru WRX, and looking at a 1999 Ford tractor.... where'd you get 40,000 to buy all this stuff lol?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12/12/11, 08:53 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Whiskey Flats(Ft. Worth) , Tx
Posts: 8,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by idigbeets View Post
I just gotta ask too fordy, feel free to ignore this.. but you're buying a Subaru WRX, and looking at a 1999 Ford tractor.... where'd you get 40,000 to buy all this stuff lol?

...................The WRX was an impulse I had because I've have always heard that the Sub's was an exceptional vehicle . I won't be buying one at all , although I did enjoy my two test drives !
.................... The owner of the 445 has been letting it sit on a vacant lot across from a busy intersection for the last month or so between his jobs and it still hasn't sold . I owned a Ford 340A for 10 years which is the little brother to this model and I know how much work these small commercial tractors can do . I could make some $$ by doing lot cleanup and such on my off days from my job . , fordy
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12/12/11, 08:56 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Whiskey Flats(Ft. Worth) , Tx
Posts: 8,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by wharton View Post
Subarus are far from extremely reliable cars. They have a recent history of wheel bearing failures, head issues, frequent strut replacements, water pumps falling apart inside the motor and other problems.They also have a well deserve reputation for consuming a lot of tires and fuel. This particular model is extremely high performance, has much higher insurance rates (for some buyers) and hardly a bargain.

I spend time on another forum where a member owns an independent repair shop in Vermont, where Subarus are a cult car. He marvels at the fact that many of his customers will spend $4,000 on repairs by the time the car has 150K on the odometer, yet still remain fiercely loyal to a brand that really isn't too impressive. (but rewards him with a steady source of income)

We currently have a newer CRV in our small fleet of vehicles. It had a minor computer glitch when it was new, and needed a light bulb replaced at the end of the warranty period. Like every other Honda we owned ,I fully expect it to provide ten years and 250,000 miles of service with little more than thoughful maintenance. We drove a new Forester at the time we purchased the CRV. I was shocked to say the least. The interior was real current, assuming it was 1985, and we were sitting in a $5000 base model car. Add a rough ride and the trademark tractor sound of the boxer motor, and the wife had zero interest in a Subaru.

On the issue of ANY car with a turbo. There is no way that it will be as reliable as a non-turbo car. Ask any independent mechanic with some experience. They have nothing in common with a big truck turbo. They are a tiny fraction of the size, and spin twice as fast. They stress the other engine components, require additional, complex control systems, create a lot of damaging heat in the engine compartment, and require the owner to be very dedicated to a rigid schedule of oil changes with high dollar synthetic.

We currently have five vehicles on the road, and log 80-90K a year total, so there is a bit of experience behind my opinion. We have been through a few Subarus, a few turbos and well over a million miles so far.

There are far better choices available in new vehicles at this time. A WRX is basically a street legal road rally race car, and a particularly poor choice given the general mindset of the members here.
................Your input is appreciated , thanks ! , fordy
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 PM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture