Raw Milk vs. Peanuts - Page 2 - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Homesteading Questions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 05/22/11, 10:03 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heritagefarm View Post
Where did I say milk was the leading cause of death back then? Quote me directly.
I am technologiically challenged.....I don't know how to copy it here.....your post at 10:43 in response to my statement that humans have been drinking raw millk for 10,000 years.....and you said that they had health problems.....and referred to increased longevity in either that post or another one.
__________________
"When you are having dinner with someone and they are nice to you, but rude to the waiter, then this is not a nice person.".....Dave Barry
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05/22/11, 10:05 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelK! View Post
When you buy a carton of raw milk in a store, how do YOU know it came from a HEALTHY animal?

When you yourself are raising Bessy in the back pasture, sure she's a well cared-for healthy cow. And sure she'll produce healthy milk. But what about the 100 cow dairy herder that managed to bribe some official to get an organic label to slap on his bottles? Do you really believe that isn't going to happen? Do you remember the videos last year of the helpless sick cows being forklifted to the gates of the slaughter house?

That's what government regulation is for, to keep the stuff that you can't see and can't control from hurting you!
If you genuinely believe that the government is protecting you....you have my sympathies.

At least here in Ohio, the ODA's priority is to promote and protect "Big Ag!!"
__________________
"When you are having dinner with someone and they are nice to you, but rude to the waiter, then this is not a nice person.".....Dave Barry
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05/22/11, 10:09 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelK! View Post
When you buy a carton of raw milk in a store, how do YOU know it came from a HEALTHY animal?

When you yourself are raising Bessy in the back pasture, sure she's a well cared-for healthy cow. And sure she'll produce healthy milk. But what about the 100 cow dairy herder that managed to bribe some official to get an organic label to slap on his bottles? Do you really believe that isn't going to happen? Do you remember the videos last year of the helpless sick cows being forklifted to the gates of the slaughter house?

That's what government regulation is for, to keep the stuff that you can't see and can't control from hurting you!
If you thought that I was implying that milk in a carton comes from a healthy animal, then you made a wrong assumption.

The average dairy cow in a large herd today last for 2.3 - 2.8 lactations....as opposed to cows in "grass-based dairies" that are living productive lives into their teens.
How healthy can a cow be that is only going to live 4-5 years????
But it passes your wonderful government inspections!!!!!
__________________
"When you are having dinner with someone and they are nice to you, but rude to the waiter, then this is not a nice person.".....Dave Barry
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05/22/11, 10:11 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shygal View Post
Um...peanuts only kill people that are severely allergic to them. Same as other allergy causing products can kill people that have severe allergic reactions to them.
Do you really want to go there, banning things that SOME people are allergic to and have died from ingesting them?




People have died from allergies to milk.
I am not sure what the point is that you are trying to make. You usually have very clear points that you make in your posts.....so, it may just be me....and being "sleep-deprived" today. if it is just me, please excuse me....
__________________
"When you are having dinner with someone and they are nice to you, but rude to the waiter, then this is not a nice person.".....Dave Barry
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05/22/11, 10:14 PM
KimM's Avatar
Student of goatology.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelK! View Post
<snip>
That's what government regulation is for, to keep the stuff that you can't see and can't control from hurting you!
No it isn't. It's for money and controlling where people buy their food from. It has nothing to do with keeping people safe.
__________________
Cloven Trail Farm
Lord help me be the person my dog thinks I am!

Ja-Lyn's Radio Flyer, aka "Rad" on his 17th birthday.
9/14/93 -12/3/10.
Rest peacefully my soulmate, I'll love you forever.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05/22/11, 10:26 PM
Shygal's Avatar
Unreality star
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 9,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by billooo2 View Post
I am not sure what the point is that you are trying to make. You usually have very clear points that you make in your posts.....so, it may just be me....and being "sleep-deprived" today. if it is just me, please excuse me....
I responded to your statements.

You said peanuts kill people, they only kill people that have severe allergic reactions to them. They don't kill people that are not allergic.

You said you never heard of anyone dying from milk from a healthy animal, and I said that people have died from allergies to milk.
__________________
Recognize the beauty in things, in creation, even when thats difficult to do.
Be loving, show compassion. Create while we're here.
Enjoy this life, be in this life but not be of it.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05/22/11, 11:55 PM
arabian knight's Avatar
Miniature Horse lover
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Central WI.
Posts: 21,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by billooo2 View Post
I am technologiically challenged.....I don't know how to copy it here.....your post at 10:43 in response to my statement that humans have been drinking raw milk for 10,000 years.....and you said that they had health problems.....and referred to increased longevity in either that post or another one.
It only takes a google search to find over 270K sites that say raw milk is not as healthy as people seem to think it is.
Yes years ago people drank raw milk. But how many either died or were sicken from it? Don't know because NO records were kept.
And besides life expectancy was a lot shorter then it is today many may not have lived long enough to develop said diseases either.

Contaminated PA Cheese Made from Raw Milk : Food Poison Journal ...
Jul 7, 2010 ... April 20, 2011. Dallas area media today reported on Mary Chiles's salmonella illness (infected by consuming contaminated raw milk). ...
http://www.foodpoisonjournal.com/......made-from-raw- milk/ - Cached

[DOC] Position Statement on the Consumption of Raw Milk
File Format: Microsoft Word - Quick View
Many raw foods may be contaminated with harmful bacteria. ..... Available at: http://www.realmilk.com/what.html Accessed on January 20, 2009. ...
foodscience.cornell.edu/.../RAW-MILK-MQIP-Position-Statement-01-09.doc - Similar
Farmer in contaminated raw milk case takes the stand | Minnesota ...
Sep 8, 2010 ... The dairy farmer accused of selling E. coli-contaminated raw milk took the ... August 20, 2010. Dairy inspector: Raw milk seller's dairy ...
minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/.../hartmann-raw-milk-case/ - Cached
New Bacteria Discovered In Raw Milk
Nov 17, 2008 ... 20, 2008) — Raw milk is illegal in many countries as it can be contaminated with potentially harmful microbes. Contamination can also spoil ...
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1117082051.htm - Cached - Similar
WSDA warns about contaminated raw milk from Shaw Island
WSDA warns about contaminated raw milk from Shaw Island. posted 04/20/2008. Consumers who have purchased raw milk from Our Lady of the Rock Dairy on Shaw ...
www.sanjuanislander.com/county/health/milk.shtml - Cached
Hoosick Falls dairy's raw milk could be contaminated | NBC-WKTV ...
Jun 5, 2009 ... A routine sample taken last month was discovered to be contaminated with Listeria bacteria. The dairy is prohibited from selling raw milk ...
www.wktv.com/healthy/47060262.html - Cached
http://www.reuters.com/.../japan-usa...7DH02R20110323 - Cached
Men's Health: Raw Milk
May 20, 2011 ... Q: Can raw milk spread disease? A: Yes. “The idea that unpasteurized milk can be contaminated with bacteria is not a random hypothesis,” ...
blogs.menshealth.com/health-headlines/raw-milk/2011/05/20 - Cached
[PDF] A novel strategy for screening-out raw milk contaminated with ...
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
by A Lermo - 2010 - Cited by 1 - Related articles
of raw milk contaminated with M. bovis, using a procedure ... Two primers 20- nucleotides long were obtained from TIB-MOLBIOL. (Berlin, Germany) and designed ...
www.im.microbios.org/1302/IM1302_0091.pdf - Similar
[PDF] Position Statement on the Consumption of Raw Milk
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
20 th century. Raw milk consumption was associated with many serious ... contaminated. Therefore, milk intended for human consumption must be obtained from ...
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05/23/11, 04:42 AM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by billooo2 View Post
If you thought that I was implying that milk in a carton comes from a healthy animal, then you made a wrong assumption.

The average dairy cow in a large herd today last for 2.3 - 2.8 lactations....as opposed to cows in "grass-based dairies" that are living productive lives into their teens.
How healthy can a cow be that is only going to live 4-5 years????
But it passes your wonderful government inspections!!!!!
The cows in a large milking herd must be the most profitable to remain in the herd. Rather than continue to milk cows into their teens, many cows are culled while they still are very productive by earlier standards.

Dairy cows that only live 4-5 years are not dying on the farms. They are dying at slaughterhouses.

It is milk production, not ill health, that gets most of the milk cows culled early.

A few years ago, I'd see lots of old worn out dairy cows going through a local sale. It was easy to see these old cows had been culled because they had problems, mis-shaped bag, lame, etc. Made me sad to see these old girls, after years of production, finally worn out and going on a long ride to the slaughterhouse in a distant city.

But now, at that same sale, because of lower milk prices, good healthy cows are going to slaughter. They would have many years of milk production ahead of them, except their production level isn't quite high enough. In order to be profitable, only the best producers are kept. Many of these "cull" cows would have been profitable 20 years ago.

Seems sad for the cows, but with these early releases from production, overall health is higher and higher quality dairy cows are being ground up, that in years past.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05/23/11, 08:09 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by haypoint View Post
The cows in a large milking herd must be the most profitable to remain in the herd. Rather than continue to milk cows into their teens, many cows are culled while they still are very productive by earlier standards.

Dairy cows that only live 4-5 years are not dying on the farms. They are dying at slaughterhouses.

It is milk production, not ill health, that gets most of the milk cows culled early.

A few years ago, I'd see lots of old worn out dairy cows going through a local sale. It was easy to see these old cows had been culled because they had problems, mis-shaped bag, lame, etc. Made me sad to see these old girls, after years of production, finally worn out and going on a long ride to the slaughterhouse in a distant city.

But now, at that same sale, because of lower milk prices, good healthy cows are going to slaughter. They would have many years of milk production ahead of them, except their production level isn't quite high enough. In order to be profitable, only the best producers are kept. Many of these "cull" cows would have been profitable 20 years ago.

Seems sad for the cows, but with these early releases from production, overall health is higher and higher quality dairy cows are being ground up, that in years past.
I have a relative that works for one one of the "high tech" agricultural firms. I asked him about this whole idea of "grass-based dairying." He said that, 'In his opinion, the milk production would be lower, but the cows would live a lot longer. The way we feed for maximum milk production burns the rumen out.'
__________________
"When you are having dinner with someone and they are nice to you, but rude to the waiter, then this is not a nice person.".....Dave Barry
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05/23/11, 08:21 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by arabian knight View Post
It only takes a google search to find over 270K sites that say raw milk is not as healthy as people seem to think it is.
Yes years ago people drank raw milk. But how many either died or were sicken from it? Don't know because NO records were kept.
And besides life expectancy was a lot shorter then it is today many may not have lived long enough to develop said diseases either.

Contaminated PA Cheese Made from Raw Milk : Food Poison Journal ...
Jul 7, 2010 ... April 20, 2011. Dallas area media today reported on Mary Chiles's salmonella illness (infected by consuming contaminated raw milk). ...
http://www.foodpoisonjournal.com/......made-from-raw- milk/ - Cached

[DOC] Position Statement on the Consumption of Raw Milk
File Format: Microsoft Word - Quick View
Many raw foods may be contaminated with harmful bacteria. ..... Available at: http://www.realmilk.com/what.html Accessed on January 20, 2009. ...
foodscience.cornell.edu/.../RAW-MILK-MQIP-Position-Statement-01-09.doc - Similar
Farmer in contaminated raw milk case takes the stand | Minnesota ...
Sep 8, 2010 ... The dairy farmer accused of selling E. coli-contaminated raw milk took the ... August 20, 2010. Dairy inspector: Raw milk seller's dairy ...
minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/.../hartmann-raw-milk-case/ - Cached
New Bacteria Discovered In Raw Milk
Nov 17, 2008 ... 20, 2008) — Raw milk is illegal in many countries as it can be contaminated with potentially harmful microbes. Contamination can also spoil ...
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1117082051.htm - Cached - Similar
WSDA warns about contaminated raw milk from Shaw Island
WSDA warns about contaminated raw milk from Shaw Island. posted 04/20/2008. Consumers who have purchased raw milk from Our Lady of the Rock Dairy on Shaw ...
www.sanjuanislander.com/county/health/milk.shtml - Cached
Hoosick Falls dairy's raw milk could be contaminated | NBC-WKTV ...
Jun 5, 2009 ... A routine sample taken last month was discovered to be contaminated with Listeria bacteria. The dairy is prohibited from selling raw milk ...
www.wktv.com/healthy/47060262.html - Cached
http://www.reuters.com/.../japan-usa...7DH02R20110323 - Cached
Men's Health: Raw Milk
May 20, 2011 ... Q: Can raw milk spread disease? A: Yes. “The idea that unpasteurized milk can be contaminated with bacteria is not a random hypothesis,” ...
blogs.menshealth.com/health-headlines/raw-milk/2011/05/20 - Cached
[PDF] A novel strategy for screening-out raw milk contaminated with ...
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
by A Lermo - 2010 - Cited by 1 - Related articles
of raw milk contaminated with M. bovis, using a procedure ... Two primers 20- nucleotides long were obtained from TIB-MOLBIOL. (Berlin, Germany) and designed ...
www.im.microbios.org/1302/IM1302_0091.pdf - Similar
[PDF] Position Statement on the Consumption of Raw Milk
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
20 th century. Raw milk consumption was associated with many serious ... contaminated. Therefore, milk intended for human consumption must be obtained from ...
I did not review each of these articles.......but I have read MANY over the years........you usually find terms like "suspected, implicated, associated with....." Careful reading shows that in many cases it was never actaully documented that the cause was raw milk, since other sources can carry the same bacteria......

If you would like to enlarge your borders, you can visit the CDC web site, and do a search for contaminated pasteurized milk. You may be surprised to find that it may not be as safe as you assumed.

A friend of mine did some perusing on the CDC site.......and he claimed that, from the studies he looked at ........people got sick from drinking contaminated raw milk, but one was more likely to die from drinking contaminated pasteurized milk.

There is a relatively easy explanation for that phemomenon. Raw milk contains components that are anti-bacterial in nature. Those are destroyed by pasteurization. If you innnoculate both a gallon of raw milk and a gallon of pasteurized milk with the same bacteria, the bacteria will still be there in the raw milk, and it may grow some, but in the pasteurized milk, that same bacteira will explode in growth. At a recent dairy goat conference I brought this point up to a person from the Dairy Division of the Ohio Department of Agriculture. He agreed. He said that I was "absolutely correct."
__________________
"When you are having dinner with someone and they are nice to you, but rude to the waiter, then this is not a nice person.".....Dave Barry
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 05/23/11, 09:37 AM
The cream separator guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Southern MO
Posts: 3,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by billooo2 View Post
I am technologiically challenged.....I don't know how to copy it here.....your post at 10:43 in response to my statement that humans have been drinking raw millk for 10,000 years.....and you said that they had health problems.....and referred to increased longevity in either that post or another one.
That doesn't actually help me either since mine says 9:43.

However, how is that taken to mean that I said raw milk was the culprit? First, you point out that raw milk has been drank for thousands of years, but I point out that people back then were not that healthy. Some were, some weren't. But the longevity was not as good as it is now. Therefore I was stating that your analogy did not actually apply since people back then did not even have SS buckets to milk into, good cleaning methods, etc etc.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 05/23/11, 01:11 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heritagefarm View Post
That doesn't actually help me either since mine says 9:43.

However, how is that taken to mean that I said raw milk was the culprit? First, you point out that raw milk has been drank for thousands of years, but I point out that people back then were not that healthy. Some were, some weren't. But the longevity was not as good as it is now. Therefore I was stating that your analogy did not actually apply since people back then did not even have SS buckets to milk into, good cleaning methods, etc etc.
My guess re: the difference in time.......we live in different time zones.

Thank you for strenghtening my argument.......in spite of the lack of sanitation......they still survived ....even though they drank raw milk!!!
__________________
"When you are having dinner with someone and they are nice to you, but rude to the waiter, then this is not a nice person.".....Dave Barry
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 05/23/11, 02:28 PM
TRAILRIDER's Avatar  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,224
Smoking kills alot of smokers and some non smokers. But costs all of us tax payers an enormous amount of money every year.
Raw milk is banned in alot of states because "it may" contain something harmful. It may not also. I think we should have a right to choose. I have the right to harm my health in alot of other ways don't I?
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 05/23/11, 11:13 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: South Central Wisconsin
Posts: 14,801
The following products are potentially life-threatening to those who are allergic to them: Eggs, fish, milk, peanuts, shellfish, soy, tree nuts, and wheat. If any of those are in a product, it must be listed on the label. If peanuts were to be outlawed, the same argument could apply to all of the others including milk.

Martin
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 05/23/11, 11:16 PM
MullersLaneFarm's Avatar  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NW-IL Fiber Enabler
Posts: 10,215
simple

follow the money
__________________

----------------------
http://homesteadingfamilies.proboards.com/
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 05/24/11, 12:45 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paquebot View Post
The following products are potentially life-threatening to those who are allergic to them: Eggs, fish, milk, peanuts, shellfish, soy, tree nuts, and wheat. If any of those are in a product, it must be listed on the label. If peanuts were to be outlawed, the same argument could apply to all of the others including milk.

Martin
Thank you for strejgthening the argument for legalizing the sale of raw milk!!!

It makes no sense when the law already allow dangreous porducts to be sold on the market!!
__________________
"When you are having dinner with someone and they are nice to you, but rude to the waiter, then this is not a nice person.".....Dave Barry
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 05/24/11, 01:15 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: South Central Wisconsin
Posts: 14,801
The same excuses that you use for peanuts apply equally to milk, raw or pasteurized. Infant deaths due to milk allergy is rare but each victim is just as dead as if the cause were peanuts or any other allergen.

Martin
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 05/24/11, 09:52 AM
The cream separator guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Southern MO
Posts: 3,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by billooo2 View Post
Thank you for strenghtening my argument.......in spite of the lack of sanitation......they still survived ....even though they drank raw milk!!!
There is a difference between "survived" and "thrived". Notice that only until recently, when technology reached a specific level, did the human population explode. Mainly because everyone stopped dying so quickly.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 05/24/11, 01:22 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 799
Quote:
Originally Posted by KimM View Post
No it isn't. It's for money and controlling where people buy their food from. It has nothing to do with keeping people safe.
Oh boy, and others here are giving me their sympathy?

Heritagefarm makes a very very good statement above. It is all the forms of technology from the sanitation plants, to vaccination, to antibiotics, to asceptic technique, to pasturization, that have all contributed to today's robust population.

People that have never seen a child die of whooping cough are the ones that protest against vaccination. People that never saw a loved elder die of tuberculosis are the ones that protest against pasturization. Sure, you can check 10,000 cows and not one will be infected with tuberculosis, but it's that 10, 001th cow that infects you. That's one of the reasons your great great great grandfather was dead at the age of forty!
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 05/24/11, 05:35 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 317
Quote:
You want an analogy, I think it is just as important to be able to drink raw milk as it is to have the right to bare arms. The day comes they ban the right to drink raw milk you better have your fire arms ready to start taking back some of those rights.
Is there any law that says you can't drink raw milk? I though the laws said you couldn't sell raw milk.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:03 AM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture