MSG being sprayed on crops?? - Page 4 - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Homesteading Questions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #61  
Old 12/22/10, 04:08 PM
Bearfootfarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 34,191
Quote:
Were those 'advances' made necessary by our food supply? In other words, maybe if we had a cleaner food supply, there wouldn't be such need for all the new techniques - because we wouldn't have the problems.
Of course not

They weren't "necessary" at all
We could have stuck with simple diagnostic equipment and never improved anything.

But now we DO have CAT scans and MRI's that find diseases earlier and make it easier to cure them, so naturally some treatments cost more than they did 50 years ago.

Cost comparisons are meaningless
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Last edited by Bearfootfarm; 12/22/10 at 04:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 12/22/10, 04:14 PM
Bearfootfarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 34,191
Quote:
"Just because there are more "additives" doesn't mean they are harmful..." Are you kidding me?
No, I'm not kidding.

Most of the "additives are natural organic products that cause no harm at all

Many of the "harnful"" ones have no effect in the minute amounts found in food, and only cause problems when given in massive doses to lab rats.

If food were as "poison" as some seem to think, MILLIONS would be dead or dying, whne reality is the majority of people have no ill effects at all
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 12/22/10, 05:55 PM
ksfarmer's Avatar
Retired farmer-rancher
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: north-central Kansas
Posts: 2,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearfootfarm View Post
No, I'm not kidding.

Most of the "additives are natural organic products that cause no harm at all

Many of the "harnful"" ones have no effect in the minute amounts found in food, and only cause problems when given in massive doses to lab rats.

If food were as "poison" as some seem to think, MILLIONS would be dead or dying, whne reality is the majority of people have no ill effects at all
What we really need in this country is a hardier breed of lab rat!!
__________________
* I'm supposed to respect my elders, but its getting harder and harder for me to find one. .*-
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 12/22/10, 06:37 PM
Bearfootfarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 34,191
Quote:
What we really need in this country is a hardier breed of lab rat!!
Maybe Monsanto can build us some?
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 12/22/10, 09:40 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearfootfarm View Post
Of course not

They weren't "necessary" at all
We could have stuck with simple diagnostic equipment and never improved anything.

But now we DO have CAT scans and MRI's that find diseases earlier and make it easier to cure them, so naturally some treatments cost more than they did 50 years ago.

Cost comparisons are meaningless
Techniques and medical advances are made, like any other advancement, because there is a need and because it is financially feasible. If those CAT scans, MRI's, etc., were not needed and in a large way, they would never have been developed.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 12/22/10, 10:25 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 107
With this discussion, we are far away from the OP. Speaking about CT scans; no MD worth his salt will risk an abdominal pain walking into an ED without a CT scan dx. As crazy as it sounds, the expensive procedure it's mainly done to prevent liability of a misdiagnosed appendicitis. In school, they are thought the skills of diagnosing one without an expensive procedure (CT) but since they have the scanner, they are somehow forgotten. Hard not to do it if they want to keep that license...
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 12/22/10, 10:59 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,272
These days certainly they may use it because of liability reasons, although, I'm not really convinced that the reason. Think about it, a doctor can use the knowledge and experience he should have an diagnose appendicitis, and charge an office visit - or he can order a CAT scan - and claim he is frightened of lawsuits - and charge much more.

New testing procedures do cost more - but to try to say the increase cost in healthcare is simply due to new procedures and not to more incidences of disease is simply not true.

Yes, we are off topic - no one yet has explained why they are spraying msg on plants.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 12/22/10, 11:34 PM
Bearfootfarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 34,191
Quote:
Techniques and medical advances are made, like any other advancement, because there is a need and because it is financially feasible. If those CAT scans, MRI's, etc., were not needed and in a large way, they would never have been developed.
While that may be true, trying to blame the need on food is not logical at all
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 12/22/10, 11:36 PM
Bearfootfarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 34,191
Quote:
no one yet has explained why they are spraying msg on plants
That was explained in the OP.

It's fertilizer
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 12/23/10, 12:05 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SW PA
Posts: 1,400
Okay, I admit that I did not read the entire article linked to the OP, but it appears that, as Bearfootfarm points out, the msg is nothing more than fertilizer. This gave me a flashback to a Horticulture class back in the mid-1970s where the lecturer went off on the foolishness of Organic Farming. He went into a near-rant on how "plants don't care" about the source of nutrients, the roots only uptake nutrients in an inorganic form whether from compost or synthetic fertilizers, and those silly organic gardeners are ignorant...etc etc. As I sat fuming and speechless, a voice from the back of the class (bless him!) gave a simple, basic lesson in Organic methods, interconnected soil life, long-term fertility, etc. Organic gardeners are not ignorant of the facts.
Judging from some of the comments here, maybe that long-ago lecturer was right. sigh.
__________________
Cindy in SW PA

Last edited by stickinthemud; 12/23/10 at 12:09 PM. Reason: make my point obvious
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 12/23/10, 07:13 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearfootfarm View Post
While that may be true, trying to blame the need on food is not logical at all
Something is causing it.

Food is the one thing so many have in common - I think it is most logical to believe it's food - and certainly a logical reason to take a good look at food - how it's produced, how it's processed, and what is added to it.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 AM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture