For Those Living in Gas Well Drilling Areas - Page 5 - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Homesteading Questions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #81  
Old 08/25/10, 04:27 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SE Oklahoma
Posts: 2,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by stanb999 View Post
A plough Clause.
Plough or Pugh?
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 08/25/10, 04:29 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 5,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by arabian knight View Post
Nice law suit,,,, a year old,,,,,, and brought to you because the epa has way too much power. LOL on them.
The lawsuit has nothing to due with the DEP or the EPA.

It's the typical guy who bought land and not the minerals.... He is a dope. He hates the fact that they could drill and him not get paid. Well he should have read the deed.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 08/25/10, 04:30 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 5,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by oneokie View Post
Plough or Pugh?
Pugh .
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 08/25/10, 04:59 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wanderer0101 View Post
If there were a shred of truth to these claims the lawyers would be all over it, and they have no hesitation about going after a company of any size as long as the money is there. This is indeed a bunch of people trying to make money off of anecdotes and ignorance. Amazing how many people want to live in the myth.
I agree, brine moving thousands of feet upward along a casing and contaminating an aquifer is unlikely, and not hard to prove. Isotopic and other analysis of the water would clearly show the source of contamination, and it would not be that difficult to pursue.

The film talked about is mainly sensationalism and intentionally doesn't go into depth that could be done to prove a case rather than simply provide anecdote. It's a scare film.

The case I had experience with was not anecdotal, water testing and treatment was my business, and it was quite clear brine from this oil/gas field that was first under production in the 1930's, now used to dispose of brine into the old wells, was leaking into the aquifer... Both strength of brine close to the field, lessening of strength the farther away from the field you tested, as well as consistent spreading pattern over 2 years made it clear.

Especially given that there are three water table depths in the county, 30ft, 120-150ft, and 400-500ft, each of which is in sand separated by fairly impermeable levels, and only the 120-150ft water table was affected. This would tend to rule out natural upwelling of brine from lower levels.

I tested 5-10 wells a day over a wide area, and I remember the first well I saw with the issue, right across the road from the old oil field. And it was the nastiest water I ever saw. Several times saltier than sea water. Told the guy there's nothing you can do, drill to the 500ft level and hope for the best. He did and all was good for him.

Over 24 months wells extending out from that point in 3 directions started going salty, at a rate consistent enough that after a year I could predict when customers wells in that water table would go salty ahead of time and predict the speed of the area of contamination..

The water well drillers were having a field day, as the deeper 500ft level was nice clean water.

Did it go to court? Dunno, can't find evidence of it. One day I'll go back down there and ask.

That kind of stuff can and does happen.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 08/25/10, 05:02 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by stanb999 View Post
Would you want this right near your house? In the yard where you have your BBQ and picnic table?

For Those Living in Gas Well Drilling Areas - Homesteading Questions
Had one about 4 blocks away.. They are temporary, work 24 hours a day until the well is drilled, and then are moved to the next drill site..

It's not like the drilling rig is permanent...
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 08/25/10, 05:10 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by stanb999 View Post
The lawsuit has nothing to due with the DEP or the EPA.

It's the typical guy who bought land and not the minerals.... He is a dope. He hates the fact that they could drill and him not get paid. Well he should have read the deed.
Not always that simple...

I just closed on a property recently... Nothing concerning mineral rights in the title search or deed description..

After talking to the title company, I'll have to independently hire an attorney to do a mineral rights search to find out when the mineral rights were separated, and what surface rights if any went with them.

That is if they were separated, which I believe they were back in the 1970's. If I own mineral rights I will be very surprised.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 08/25/10, 05:21 PM
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 721
I agree that addendums are key, however the Gas companies are done giving anything in many places of PA, because most of the land was gotten with boilerplate leases for very little money. We are one of the very few not leased in SE Tioga County. We have under 20 acres, so we were passed over until late summer 2008 & then things fell out. Have been dealing with 3 companies since December & I can get a decent amount of bonus & royalty from one, but next to NO protections. The other 2 offer the very little.

It is also true that it is temporary, however 10-40 years "temporary" is more than my lifetime. In some places the truck traffic is unbearable. I am happy for residents that do benefit from this, but the place will never be the same again in my lifetime. I also question the constant talk of jobs for so many locals. It seems most of the workers are from out of state. Housing is an issue & much of the real estate sales have stalled.

Our state government is looking for the tax money & really doesn't care about protecting the landowners. It would be great if this drilling would make the USA more independent, but I have heard about them wanting to export some of it. I always told my sons that someday Tioga would be trashed just like Berks County. Now I am afraid I may have been right. I hope that NC PA stays as beautiful as it is, but I have my doubts. JMHO
__________________
Cindy in PA
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 08/25/10, 05:32 PM
Patt's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ouachitas, AR
Posts: 6,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by stanb999 View Post
The lawsuit has nothing to due with the DEP or the EPA.

It's the typical guy who bought land and not the minerals.... He is a dope. He hates the fact that they could drill and him not get paid. Well he should have read the deed.
Ah, I see so you say show me a lawsuit and I show you one and as usual for people who really have no grounds for their argument you say well that doesn't count because I say so. Right......
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 08/25/10, 05:36 PM
Patt's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ouachitas, AR
Posts: 6,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wanderer0101 View Post
If there were a shred of truth to these claims the lawyers would be all over it, and they have no hesitation about going after a company of any size as long as the money is there. This is indeed a bunch of people trying to make money off of anecdotes and ignorance. Amazing how many people want to live in the myth.
Lawyers are all over it:
http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/ove...uring_fracking
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 08/25/10, 05:36 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 5,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cindy in PA View Post
I agree that addendums are key, however the Gas companies are done giving anything in many places of PA, because most of the land was gotten with boilerplate leases for very little money. We are one of the very few not leased in SE Tioga County. We have under 20 acres, so we were passed over until late summer 2008 & then things fell out. Have been dealing with 3 companies since December & I can get a decent amount of bonus & royalty from one, but next to NO protections. The other 2 offer the very little.

20 acres could provide you with a great retirement. 12 dollars a day per acre for 30 years is good money. no?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cindy in PA View Post
It is also true that it is temporary, however 10-40 years "temporary" is more than my lifetime. In some places the truck traffic is unbearable. I am happy for residents that do benefit from this, but the place will never be the same again in my lifetime. I also question the constant talk of jobs for so many locals. It seems most of the workers are from out of state. Housing is an issue & much of the real estate sales have stalled.

Real estate has "stalled" all over the country. In fact most places it has declined 30%. I know that's not the case.
The gas companies are trying to hire locals. Most folks here don't want to work the crazy shifts. But it's changing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cindy in PA View Post
Our state government is looking for the tax money & really doesn't care about protecting the landowners. It would be great if this drilling would make the USA more independent, but I have heard about them wanting to export some of it. I always told my sons that someday Tioga would be trashed just like Berks County. Now I am afraid I may have been right. I hope that NC PA stays as beautiful as it is, but I have my doubts. JMHO
Fast Eddie wants the money... Who is surprised? Maybe Tioga will be saved from suburban sprawl. I know of know one who has broken up a farm in the last 3 years in my area, no farm auctions, etc. I hope the gas money allows this to continue.

I here the gas company I'm leased with wants to export it. I really hate the idea of it. But there is little I can do. They want to sell it to the ANTI'S in NY and NJ. I say let them freeze in winter.

Last edited by stanb999; 08/25/10 at 05:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #91  
Old 08/25/10, 05:45 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 5,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patt View Post
Ah, I see so you say show me a lawsuit and I show you one and as usual for people who really have no grounds for their argument you say well that doesn't count because I say so. Right......
I didn't ask about a lawsuit... I know of several. The root of the issue is severed mineral rights for the most part. I'm also sure his land got some junk on it. But I'm also sure it's not nearly as bad as he is claiming. Spilling a little oil when you change the oil in your car could require a million dollar clean up. One has to put stuff in perspective.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 08/25/10, 06:41 PM
texican's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carthage, Texas
Posts: 12,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronbre View Post
have seen some of the contracts they are trying to get signed around our property and they have clauses where they can come in and litereally take your land for next to nothing and next to no reason..needless to say we didn't sign..none of us in our neighborhood signed
I've seen some doozies in the addendums and in the lease itself, but nothing close to what your saying... I'd love to see one of these leases, could you email me a copy or post it somewhere so I could take a peek at it. Or just scan, copy and paste it here.

Haven't got a clue what section you might be talking about, but if it's actually drilling on someone's land, all you have to do is have a "no occupancy clause" put in the lease.
__________________
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. Seneca
Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival. W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 08/25/10, 06:48 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Upstate NY currently
Posts: 594
Stan, Actually yes, real estate has stalled just about everywhere but here in upstate NY it hasn't taken THAT big of a hit. In my own research for a property, I have monitored the CNY real estate market intensively, every single day, for over 5 years and feel very comfortable saying that I probably know the market there as well as (if not better than some) of the agents in that area.

Since the gas leasing thing happened the market there has basically driven off a cliff for any property with land to it. Unless, of course, you don't want the mineral/gas rights with proceeds being retained by former owner on some. Or unless of course you wish to live next to all the state land that has been leased where lots of drilling will be going on. I guess that doesn't bother some but generally from what I've seen in the local RE market and also from talking with many agents in that area, the market HAS been severely negatively impacted by the gas leasing and most people are neither listing or buying.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 08/25/10, 06:56 PM
texican's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carthage, Texas
Posts: 12,261
Well, the Pugh clause is pretty common... but there's also a "plough clause" in most old leases... all lines had to be x feet under the ground, well below the plough line.

Then, you have the rarest of birds (no oil company will talk about) the Vertical Pugh Clause. After the primary term of the lease is up, if they drilled a well, all depths 100' below the producing formation is now released back to the mineral owner, and available for leasing again. Some of my clients learned about the Vertical Pugh a few years back. They've made small fortunes because of that one clause. My best client just got 500K because she had a Vertical Pugh, all the other mineral owners in the unit are SOL, as their tracts are Held By Production.
__________________
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. Seneca
Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival. W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 08/25/10, 07:21 PM
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: north central wv
Posts: 2,321
How many of you live close to where drilling is going on? How many of the companies are doing what they should to protect our lands? I have a what used to be a nice little stream across the road and about a hundred ft from the road. There was at the time old wells here that was still producing. The kids all up and down this stream fished and played in it and caught fish and crayfish. Then came the todays drillers and now there isn't a fish to be found in this stream. I personally tried to get people from the EPA out to check the stream when it was noticed that fish were dying and an oily film was on the water. Can you guess how many EPA people came out? Today I wouldn't let a kid of mine wade in this stream or would I let a dog drink from it. NO I am not against drilling I am against drilling ruining our lands. I have not seen a well head here anywhere that is fenced in with a nice gravel road going to it. Most of them have a bare dirt 4wheeler path going to them. I can't prove where the things came from that killed this little stream but the drilling is the ONLY thing different. Sam
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 08/25/10, 07:51 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 5,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamsam View Post
How many of you live close to where drilling is going on? How many of the companies are doing what they should to protect our lands? I have a what used to be a nice little stream across the road and about a hundred ft from the road. There was at the time old wells here that was still producing. The kids all up and down this stream fished and played in it and caught fish and crayfish. Then came the todays drillers and now there isn't a fish to be found in this stream. I personally tried to get people from the EPA out to check the stream when it was noticed that fish were dying and an oily film was on the water. Can you guess how many EPA people came out? Today I wouldn't let a kid of mine wade in this stream or would I let a dog drink from it. NO I am not against drilling I am against drilling ruining our lands. I have not seen a well head here anywhere that is fenced in with a nice gravel road going to it. Most of them have a bare dirt 4wheeler path going to them. I can't prove where the things came from that killed this little stream but the drilling is the ONLY thing different. Sam
2 wells withing a mile. Many more are permitted.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 08/25/10, 08:36 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wanderer0101 View Post
Throw away your tin foil hat, life will be a lot better.
Having lived in PA all my life, I can say it is in one's best interest to look at our state's Department of Environmental Prostitution, and their willingness to enforce reguations, with a skeptical eye. One thing you can always count on, the companies that stand to make a boat load of money at the expense of the locals and the environment will most certainly make their boat load of money. Politicians are bought and sold.

I live in an area that, years after the mining industry left, still bears the scars. I feel sorry for you folks that live in the area affected by the gas drilling who actually value your land over a quick buck (or several thousand bucks). I hope, for your sakes, the rosy picture the supporters paint is what comes to pass.
__________________
Anne
Give me a sweet home set among the trees,
With friends whose words are ever kind and true.
-Phoebe Carey-


LONE PINE FARM
Barnesville, PA

Boer goats, Angora goats, Eclectic mix of poultry
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 08/25/10, 08:44 PM
texican's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carthage, Texas
Posts: 12,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamsam View Post
How many of you live close to where drilling is going on? How many of the companies are doing what they should to protect our lands? I have a what used to be a nice little stream across the road and about a hundred ft from the road. There was at the time old wells here that was still producing. The kids all up and down this stream fished and played in it and caught fish and crayfish. Then came the todays drillers and now there isn't a fish to be found in this stream. I personally tried to get people from the EPA out to check the stream when it was noticed that fish were dying and an oily film was on the water. Can you guess how many EPA people came out? Today I wouldn't let a kid of mine wade in this stream or would I let a dog drink from it. NO I am not against drilling I am against drilling ruining our lands. I have not seen a well head here anywhere that is fenced in with a nice gravel road going to it. Most of them have a bare dirt 4wheeler path going to them. I can't prove where the things came from that killed this little stream but the drilling is the ONLY thing different. Sam
Imho, atv's and 4wheelers do more damage than gas wells. Around here, quite a few atv's have snorkels... they have no thought about the stream ecology, or what emissions (oil, gas, greases, etc.) are getting into the fouled up stream.
__________________
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. Seneca
Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival. W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 08/26/10, 05:16 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 5,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by texican View Post
Well, the Pugh clause is pretty common... but there's also a "plough clause" in most old leases... all lines had to be x feet under the ground, well below the plough line.

Then, you have the rarest of birds (no oil company will talk about) the Vertical Pugh Clause. After the primary term of the lease is up, if they drilled a well, all depths 100' below the producing formation is now released back to the mineral owner, and available for leasing again. Some of my clients learned about the Vertical Pugh a few years back. They've made small fortunes because of that one clause. My best client just got 500K because she had a Vertical Pugh, all the other mineral owners in the unit are SOL, as their tracts are Held By Production.
Your right Texican, I have both.

Min. depth for pipes is 3 ft. They have to double dig as well. Top soil one side, hard pan the other. Pugh only for non production areas. Not vertical. They just wouldn't go for it.
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 08/26/10, 11:44 AM
texican's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carthage, Texas
Posts: 12,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by stanb999 View Post
Your right Texican, I have both.

Min. depth for pipes is 3 ft. They have to double dig as well. Top soil one side, hard pan the other. Pugh only for non production areas. Not vertical. They just wouldn't go for it.
Until the deep haynesville/bossier shale discovery, lessors could care less about vertical pugh addendums... hey, there's nothing below 12,000', so sure, if you want a vertical pugh clause, fine. And then, the deep shale was discovered, and all of a sudden, the vp holders make a fortune. They're going to 20K deep hereabouts... who knows, their might be a formation below this...
__________________
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. Seneca
Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival. W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture