03/30/09, 05:27 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: KS
Posts: 801
|
|
Cotton Picker,
Again, I have no idea what you’re trying to say.
Did you or did you not post this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cotton Picker
I don't mean to challenge the masculinity of any of the posters here.... But let's forward a few alternate notions... How many here have killed another human being in war or self defense?....How many have been in an actual life or death firefight?... OK.... How many have looked down the barrel of a loaded weapon in the grasp of a hostile adversary?..... How many have had a home invasion?... While you were asleep in your bed?.....
Chances are good that not too many here have experienced any of the above... An hopefully never will...
|
That is where I dug up the reference to YOUR prerequisites, if you bother to read any of my posts I wrote no such thing. I simply quoted you and wrote that many people have managed to defend themselves with firearms without the benefit of experiencing the above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck R.
Well despite your posturing, people use firearms very frequently to defend themselves without the benefit of:
Having killed another human being in war or self defense.
Having been in an actual life or death firefight.
Having looked down the barrel of a loaded weapon in the grasp of a hostile adversary.
Having had a home invasion.
I guess there's just a first time for everything.
Chuck
|
Also if you can find any “trigger happy rhetoric” in any of my posts please go ahead and quote it for me.
Nowhere in any of my posts have I even alluded to any type of rules of engagement, again if you can find any examples please quote them.
I believe I've pretty much managed to stick to the issue of using birdshot for SD, and done my best to substantiate my opinions using articles, test reports, and ballistic data.
Chuck
__________________
Might does not make right, but it sure makes what is.
|
