
02/28/09, 09:12 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Zone 7
Posts: 10,560
|
|
|
I have been around the block a number of times. I have built several houses and lived in many. I have had massive masonry free standing fireplaces, inserts in brick fireplaces, two outdoor waterstoves and more than several woodstoves. For the romantic, the old conventional fireplace with a low burning hardwood split log and a slow release of embers with a few glowing going up the chimney creates the mood. On the other hand, if it is cold outside and you want to have the nice toasty and secure feeling nothing beats a woodstove. Here are some of the short comings. The fireplace is terribly inefficient and gives off little heat. When not being used there always seems to be some heat lost through the doors and damper. Inserts are better than fire places for heat but in time the metal in the insert will burn out and you will have a major expense. Wood fired outside water circulated stoves keep the trash outside and provided inefficient burning but give clean heat inside. Maintenance is a problem along with excessive smoke at ground level and a fire has to be keep during the cold season to prevent the piping from freezing. Finally we get to the device that creates rather efficient heat and provides warmth with minimal expense, maintenance and no power requirement while being able to burn it safely plus access it 24/7 regardless of the weather plus you can make a pot of coffee or cook on it in an emergency. Buy and install a quality wood stove. You will have no regrets and it will last for years. All of these methods require someone to attend to sourcing and feeding wood. You do need a backup of a standalone heat source. My first choice would be a geothermal heatpump and the second would be package terminal air conditioner/heat pump. The geothermal is expensive and the PTAC/HP is cheap.
__________________
Agmantoo
If they can do it,
you know you can!
|