 |
|

04/02/08, 08:20 AM
|
 |
Fair to adequate Mod
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Between Crosslake and Emily Minnesota
Posts: 13,728
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleK
Hey CabinFever is copper from biosolids generally as available as copper from other sources? ....
|
No, it's not as available because the copper in biosolids is typically chelated with organic matter. As the organic matter decomposes, it releases the copper in a more plant-available form. The saving grace here is that even though the availability of biosolids copper is less compared to commerical sources, the total amount applied per acre of copper is generally more with biosolids.
This is me talking to a bunch of farmers about biosolids recycling:
__________________
This is the government the Founding Fathers warned us about.....
Last edited by Cabin Fever; 04/02/08 at 08:48 AM.
|

04/02/08, 02:13 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: GA & Ala
Posts: 6,207
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ford major
http://i262.photobucket.com/albums/i...8th2007012.jpg
http://i262.photobucket.com/albums/i...8th2007009.jpg
like Cabin i have worked with biosolids as well as farm manures for the last 25 years, longer realy as i have spread manure on our own farm since 1972! as well my wife is a waste water treatment operator/supervisor and has licenses (and knowledge!) to treat potable water, sample water and do microbiological testing of water and biosolids/sludges. none of our coworkers or ourselves have gotten sick from handling biosolids and as far as i know there has been minimal impact too the environment from our activities. the above pix are biosolids spreading from a dragline system suppied by 10,000 gallon (imperial) hiway trailers applied at 9,000 (c of a was 10,000 imp gals/acre) on a former gravel pit/topsoil stripped farm. grows nice crops now after 16 years of spreading with no metal contamination.
|
Hey we could form a business - you, CabinFever and me - wastewater treatment design/building and waste management. I was heavily involved in design and building of WWTPs for 12 years - lol..saw a lot of waste in that time and we spread the solids (treated of course) in a slurry on golf courses and hay fields down here. I worked for the President of a WWTP design firm for many years and did on site field work during construction and wrote O&M manuals for municipalities..
might be a good gig..lol now that fertilizer has skyrocketed.
__________________
Be yourself - no one can tell you that you're doing it wrong!
|

04/02/08, 05:56 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: East-Central Ontario
Posts: 3,862
|
|
|
Reply
Thanks Cabin Fever, that's what my gut told me but I kept getting mixed info everywhere I asked. Guess with putting it on right after we take it off it should be just right for the next wheat crop anyway.
__________________
The internet - fueling paranoia and misinformation since 1873.
|

04/02/08, 06:01 PM
|
|
In Remembrance
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 6,844
|
|
|
If you have soil samples done, also ask for a trace element analysis.
|

04/02/08, 06:59 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: No. Cent. AR
Posts: 1,731
|
|
|
I'm not so much concerned with pathogens, etc. in the biosolids as I am with residual medications, hormones, etc. excreted by folks taking those meds daily. How does a treatment plant handle those items?
|

04/02/08, 09:01 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 260
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by insocal
SNIP>>>
Folks would do well to read up on how Gene Logsdon runs his farm. Those sily things called legumes are an essential part of the picture. Continuous corn (or continuous ANYTHING) is the road to ruin.
|
My Dad RIP had an agriculture degree before becoming a DVM. He grew up in Cuba and their ain't much in that country except for farming and that was before communist dictatorship. I wish he could have seen this place, he would have had a ball working on it. I did not learn much but a few things
since I never owned much more than 2 acres when he was alive.
One of the things was as you mentioned crop rotation. Everyone speaks of the "wonderful Cuban cigars" well that is all BS now, has been for years. Greed took over with the tobacco farming when it became goverment owned/run. Instead of rotating crops he said that field upon field of tobacco was grown each and every season on the same soil.
Eventually the crops became junk and the famous cigars are now just famous by name all because of the lack of neutrents. You are better off with tobacco from other contries like the Dominican Republic, Equador, or Costa Rica they are grown from seeds smuggled out of Cuba generations ago but many of those farms will rotate as needed. I think I am going to go grow some clover and legumes this year and take my time starting off.
Rich
Last edited by SCRich; 04/02/08 at 09:23 PM.
|

04/02/08, 09:05 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 24,572
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EasyDay
We couldn't afford enough horses to fertilize our 40 acre pasture.
|
We have five horses and 96 acres. Of course, we don't try to fertilize all of it...33 acres are planted in hardwoods, several acres are "yard" which doesn't get fertilized.
|

04/03/08, 06:59 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 473
|
|
|
Paqebot (Martin),
Regarding the earlier post concerning 'petrochemical fertilizer' Google has
557 thousand hits on the subject.
Post#51 "--Sulfur. Just about every bit available now is a product of petroleum refining" Your words. Sounds like petrochemical.
|

04/03/08, 07:40 AM
|
 |
Fair to adequate Mod
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Between Crosslake and Emily Minnesota
Posts: 13,728
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by goatlady
I'm not so much concerned with pathogens, etc. in the biosolids as I am with residual medications, hormones, etc. excreted by folks taking those meds daily. How does a treatment plant handle those items?
|
What isn't decomposed at the treatment plant is degraded in the soil. I am not aware of any research or instances where these materials are taken up by plants or leached to groundwater. These chemicals can cause problems with fish if they enter surface waters. Some research has shown that hormones cause male fish to have more female characteristics.
__________________
This is the government the Founding Fathers warned us about.....
|

04/03/08, 11:01 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: South Central Wisconsin
Posts: 14,801
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WayneR
Paqebot (Martin),
Regarding the earlier post concerning 'petrochemical fertilizer' Google has
557 thousand hits on the subject.
Post#51 "--Sulfur. Just about every bit available now is a product of petroleum refining" Your words. Sounds like petrochemical.
|
Not certain what you mean but sulfur is a natural element no matter where it is found or how it is obtained. The post in particular was to point out that sulfur is allowed in "organic" operations with no regard as to its origin. It's identical no matter if it's from crude oil, coal, or pumped from underground deposits. The bulk of it now is converted to acid to extract phosphorus from phosphate rock.
Want to learn more hypocrisy? Three common products may be mined by the virtually identical process of pumping water into underground deposits to bring the product to the surface for settling in holding ponds. Potash, salt, and sulfur. Two are accepted for "organic" and one is not.
Martin
|

04/03/08, 04:24 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Eastern N.C.
Posts: 8,834
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cabin Fever
What isn't decomposed at the treatment plant is degraded in the soil. I am not aware of any research or instances where these materials are taken up by plants or leached to groundwater. These chemicals can cause problems with fish if they enter surface waters. Some research has shown that hormones cause male fish to have more female characteristics.
|
In what way CF, Ill and hard to get along with or just plain mean for no apparent reason.   LOL EDDIE
|

04/05/08, 09:06 AM
|
 |
construction and Garden b
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: east ont canada
Posts: 7,380
|
|
|
sounds like a plan sidepasser! better it run through a treatment plant than straight into a water way!a lot of what hits the drains is minuscule in the mix, good soil is not inert, full of bacteria, viruses and hormones already and in quantity. plough down crops of clovers contain estrogens, rye, molds like ergot (LSD like substance) alfalfa has allelopathic traits and yet these are still planted and used in organic practice.
__________________
àigeach carnaid
chaora dhubh
" Don't raise your voice, improve your argument."
cruachan
|

04/05/08, 09:08 AM
|
 |
construction and Garden b
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: east ont canada
Posts: 7,380
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chichi
There hav been severel articles about this in our local paper -- not on line. Big issue of people pouring old meds down the toilet, draino, paint and just about antything else. It all ends up at the seuer plant. They were saying how it gummed up things, made the microbes not work as well and how farmers didnt want the results so itwas going into the land fill. A shame.
|
my dw has spent many a late night tending her digester cause some idiot has dumped a bunch of soap in the system! yep that porcelain throne does get abused a lot! specially after a chili cook off!
__________________
àigeach carnaid
chaora dhubh
" Don't raise your voice, improve your argument."
cruachan
|

04/15/08, 04:46 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mountains of Vermont, Zone 3
Posts: 8,878
|
|
Interesting, this story just popped up on APNews:
http://apnews.excite.com/article/200...D90168I00.html
Lots of questions about the safety of spreading sludge. Interesting that they did their testing on poor neighborhoods. Less likely to object and bring lawsuits perhaps. The lead investigator has other controversial research (ethics?) according to the article.
__________________
SugarMtnFarm.com -- Pastured Pigs, Poultry, Sheep, Dogs and Kids
|

04/16/08, 08:21 AM
|
 |
Fair to adequate Mod
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Between Crosslake and Emily Minnesota
Posts: 13,728
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by highlands
Interesting, this story just popped up on APNews:
http://apnews.excite.com/article/200...D90168I00.html
Lots of questions about the safety of spreading sludge. Interesting that they did their testing on poor neighborhoods. Less likely to object and bring lawsuits perhaps. The lead investigator has other controversial research (ethics?) according to the article.
|
It amazes me how the liberal press will play the “race card” in an attempt to stir up debate. This study chose the yards in question because they were contaminated with lead from paint and leaded gasoline, NOT because they were owned by poor, black people.....sheesh! For your reference, the statement from the USDA researcher who conducted this study is provided below. If you truly are interested in learning something about this topic and the beneficial use of biosolids in reducing the bioavailability of heavy metals in contaminated soils, please read the links provided at the end of this post.
"An AP news article by John Heilprin and Kevin Vineys that appeared in newspapers today is an incomplete and imbalanced discussion of a field test I cooperated in conducting in Baltimore a few years ago. We applied Class A biosolids (pathogen-free) compost from Baltimore, a high quality soil conditioner product available for sale for all home and garden uses in the region. The soil treatments did substantially reduce the risk to children from lead (Pb) in those soils. As reported in the paper "This longitudinal pilot study shows that in situ amendment of lead-containing yard soil with Orgro [biosolids compost] is associated with a significant reduction in bioaccessible Pb fraction and the development of a healthy turfgrass cover at 1-year follow-up."
"It is clear that our method using simple incorporation of biosolids compost rich in Fe and P into high Pb urban soils offers individual homeowners the ability to greatly reduce the risk of soil Pb to their children when no public program will assist them in soil removal and replacement. I am comfortable that the issues of soil and housing Pb risks to the children were well disclosed to the participants. Contrary to claims, the families who cooperated in the field test were part of a community group where they learned more about how to protect their children from housing and environmental Pb. An ethics review at Johns Hopkins University (JHU) and HUD approved the test. I was a cooperator/advisor and no such review was sought at USDA. All funding went to JHU.”
Dr. Rufus Chaney
USDA-ARS-EMBUL Bldg. 007, BARC-West 10300
Baltimore Blvd.
Beltsville, MD 20705-2350
Reference articles can be found here:
Biosolids Compost Amendment for Reducing Soil Lead Hazards (2005)
Reducing Children's Risk from Lead in Soil (2004)
__________________
This is the government the Founding Fathers warned us about.....
|

04/16/08, 07:47 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 866
|
|
|
The soil was already "leaded", unfortunately in many low income family situations the shade tree mechanic is the only option, the yard is the victim of spills.... houses before 1972 were all leaded...many people can't afford the strip and repainting....This is a imperfect solution to a serious problem....To question the ethics of these researchers is going to far....If just 25% effective that a win - win for these families.
|

04/17/08, 09:50 AM
|
 |
Chief Bottle Washer
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 528
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alice Kramden
Is the chicken litter that expensive?
|
The guy who delivers our feed, here in SW MO, is selling pelleted chicken manure for about $250 p/ ton I believe. Dunno how effective it is because it has to be heated and treated and such to get into the pelleted stage.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 PM.
|
|