 |
|

05/22/07, 10:51 AM
|
|
In Remembrance
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Central Kansas
Posts: 11,076
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pony
Just a quick question about RoundUp and similar products.
Where does the run off go?
Thanks,
Pony!
|
If it is applied according to label directions as required by law there will be no run off. What little of the active ingredient there is will soak into the soil and will be broken down.
As to using glyphosate on road ditches I ask why? Most need the soil held in place by vegetation. Vegetation also slows water flow. Why kill all of the vegetation with glyphosate?
|

05/22/07, 10:56 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 4,124
|
|
|
The definition of organic says nothing about having to use heritage or heirloom seeds.
Also, a lot of the problem with sludge is not the human feces, it is all the other chemicals that people dump down their toilets- bleach, cleaners, lye, whatever they want to get rid of, etc etc. I also wonder whether all that bleached toilet paper woudl have a lot of dioxins in it?
Additionally, if you are selling produce, it isn't possible to have a closed loop, because the buyers are walking off with the nutrients from your soil, and then they go poop somewhere else, in other words they do not return the nutrients to you.
|

05/22/07, 05:35 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 353
|
|
|
No human poop in the gardens here - organic or otherwise!
Windy in Kansas - the Roundup on the roadway is not in a ditch. It is used on banks where poison ivy and wild roses hang over into the road. One neighbor does spray it everywhere in spite of requests to use restraint. He says he does not like to weed-whack and so there is little we can do. On the sections two of us maintain the round up is only used on the poison ivy and wild rose......and on one bad section with pampass grass.
This is interesting discussion. I did not realize it would raise such emotion too. Thank you for all the input.
|

05/22/07, 05:47 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,905
|
|
|
couldn't find the link, but i read story about an organic farmer (vermont? connecticut?) who raised pigs and chickens. he took the food waste from organic restaurants (and charged them a tipping fee, slightly less than they would pay to the garbage company) and fed that to his pigs and chickens, along with pasturing them. then sold his fattened pigs to organic restaurants. seems to me that's pretty sustainable, and doesn't use any humanure. think he's been doing this for 20-30 years too. (wish i could find that link. sorry.)
--sgl
|

05/22/07, 06:09 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 17,225
|
|
|
OK, how about this? Organic has a hard and fast line. Either it is or is not organic. Sustainability is on a scale. You have have 90% sustainable, etc.
__________________
Flaming Xtian
I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.
Mahatma Gandhi
Libertarindependent
|

05/22/07, 07:14 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 17,225
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MaineFarmMom
Here's a question. What if you can make all the compost you need to keep the soil healthy, save your own seeds, make your own pesticides, cut your weeds for the compost pile, etc. BUT you bring home organic manure, someone else's leaves or seaweed from the beach (which I did recently) to add to your garden and compost pile? Are you still sustainable? Or did you stop being sustainable because you can and did bring home other options?
|
It's sustainable in my book. If your farm has outputs there is no reason it shouldn't have inputs.
__________________
Flaming Xtian
I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.
Mahatma Gandhi
Libertarindependent
|

05/22/07, 07:49 PM
|
 |
zone 5 - riverfrontage
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Forests of maine
Posts: 5,869
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chamoisee
The definition of organic says nothing about having to use heritage or heirloom seeds.
|
http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/NOP/stan...odHandReg.html
The National Organic Program as administered by the USDA, Regulatory Text Section 205.204 Seeds and planting stock practice standard.
Quote:
|
(a) The producer must use organically grown seeds, annual seedlings, and planting stock: Except, That, ...
|
We are in the process of certifying for our "organic certification" which takes a minimum of three years to apply for.
This is our first year of being inspected for organic compliance, we must be inspected during both of the following two years, as a prerequisite.
We can not use hybrid seed for any crop that is being grown as 'organic', nor can our crop-land have any hybrid seed planted in it during this period of time that is not 'organic'. It must all be 'organic' seed, nothing GMO, nothing hybrid, only heritage/heirloom seed.
|

05/22/07, 08:30 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 4,124
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ET1 SS
The National Organic Program as administered by the USDA, Regulatory Text Section 205.204 Seeds and planting stock practice standard.
We are in the process of certifying for our "organic certification" which takes a minimum of three years to apply for.
This is our first year of being inspected for organic compliance, we must be inspected during both of the following two years, as a prerequisite.
We can not use hybrid seed for any crop that is being grown as 'organic', nor can our crop-land have any hybrid seed planted in it during this period of time that is not 'organic'. It must all be 'organic' seed, nothing GMO, nothing hybrid, only heritage/heirloom seed.
|
I read through that and it said nothing whatsoever about hybrid, heritage, or heirloom seeds. All it said was that except for a few exceptions, the seeds have to be organic. They could be any kind of organic open pollinated non-GMO seed, or even organic hybrid seeds.
|

05/22/07, 09:04 PM
|
 |
zone 5 - riverfrontage
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Forests of maine
Posts: 5,869
|
|
|
Organic seed is not hydrid.
|

05/22/07, 09:06 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 17,225
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ET1 SS
Organic seed is not hydrid.
|
All corn is hybrid. Are you saying there is no organic corn?
__________________
Flaming Xtian
I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.
Mahatma Gandhi
Libertarindependent
|

05/22/07, 09:37 PM
|
 |
Chicken Mafioso
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: N. TX/ S. OK
Posts: 26,190
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tinknal
All corn is hybrid. Are you saying there is no organic corn?
|
Umm, there are lots of corn varieties that aren't hybrids.
__________________
JESUS WAS NOT POLITICALLY CORRECT
|

05/22/07, 09:40 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 17,225
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ladycat
Umm, there are lots of corn varieties that aren't hybrids.
|
Corn is a hybrid cross of 2 different plants.
__________________
Flaming Xtian
I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.
Mahatma Gandhi
Libertarindependent
|

05/22/07, 09:44 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 17,225
|
|
"There are several theories about the specific origin of maize in Mesoamerica:
1. It is a direct domestication of a Mexican annual teosinte, Zea mays ssp. parviglumis, native to the Balsas River valley of southern Mexico, with up to 12% of its genetic material obtained from Zea mays ssp. mexicana through introgression;
2. It derives from hybridization between a small domesticated maize (a slightly changed form of a wild maize) and a teosinte of section Luxuriantes, either Z. luxurians or Z. diploperennis;
3. It underwent two or more domestications either of a wild maize or of a teosinte;
4. It evolved from a hybridization of Z. diploperennis by Tripsacum dactyloides. (The term "teosinte" describes all species and subspecies in the genus Zea, excluding Zea mays ssp. mays.) In the late 1930s, Paul Mangelsdorf suggested that domesticated maize was the result of a hybridization event between an unknown wild maize and a species of Tripsacum, a related genus. However, the proposed role of tripsacum (gama grass) in the origins of maize has been refuted by modern genetic analysis, negating Mangelsdorf’s model and the fourth listed above."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maize#Maize_physiology
__________________
Flaming Xtian
I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.
Mahatma Gandhi
Libertarindependent
|

05/22/07, 09:51 PM
|
 |
Chicken Mafioso
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: N. TX/ S. OK
Posts: 26,190
|
|
|
It may have started as a hybrid, but evolved into it's own form.
Just as many domestic animal breeds and other plants originally started out as crosses.
The domestic cat has been found to contain genetic material from 7 different species of small wild cats, but it has evolved into it's own species (of sorts).
__________________
JESUS WAS NOT POLITICALLY CORRECT
|

05/22/07, 09:52 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 113
|
|
|
Sustain means....
# To keep in existence; maintain.
# To supply with necessities or nourishment; provide for.
# To support from below; keep from falling or sinking;
Sustainable farming has come about with NAIS and other of these programs that desire to have control over our lives. Just think when the word became popular! I do not want the NAIS in any part of my life. If we depend on being told what to do we shall be flushed down the drain so fast we won't be able to yell help! Farm organic if you want to, everybody should , it would be better for the whole world, but steer clear of that binding threat - sustainable!
Suemo
prop.[QUOTE=The Paw]I think the term "sustainable" has been bandied about, and means different things to different people. (some would say the term has been "co-opted").
__________________
Nimbus Dairy Goats
somewhere in Missouri Ozarks!!
LaManchas for milk and show lambs
nimbusdairygoats.com
|

05/22/07, 09:58 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 17,225
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ladycat
It may have started as a hybrid, but evolved into it's own form.
Just as many domestic animal breeds and other plants originally started out as crosses.
The domestic cat has been found to contain genetic material from 7 different species of small wild cats, but it has evolved into it's own species (of sorts).
|
A breed is not the same as a species. The cat may contain genetic materials from 7 different STRAINS of the same species, they had to be the same specie in the first place to be able to provide viable offspring.
__________________
Flaming Xtian
I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.
Mahatma Gandhi
Libertarindependent
|

05/22/07, 10:24 PM
|
 |
Chicken Mafioso
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: N. TX/ S. OK
Posts: 26,190
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tinknal
A breed is not the same as a species. The cat may contain genetic materials from 7 different STRAINS of the same species, they had to be the same specie in the first place to be able to provide viable offspring.
|
7 separate species.
Most of the small cats can interbreed, and most of the large cats can interbreed. They are definitely distinct species.
__________________
JESUS WAS NOT POLITICALLY CORRECT
|

05/22/07, 10:56 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 2,400
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ET1 SS
If you use non-heritage seed, it is non-organic.
Using hybrids or 'newer' strains or GMO-seed; thus can never be 'organic'. However that could be within 'sustainable'.
Now I do understand the difference between hybrid and newer strains, generally hybrids are crosses and will not reproduce true. However once you have used such a cross, through many generations and you finally get it to reproduce 'true', it is still not an organic strain, it is a new strain and not organic.
|
So why does a seed developed later not qualify? I understand why GMO wouldn't but how old does a 'newer' strain have to get to qualify?
__________________
Give Blood it saves lives.
|

05/22/07, 11:32 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,869
|
|
|
OK I'm about to wrap my head in duct tape to keep it from exploding, but if I do blood is gonna start shootin' from my eyes....
I couldn't read all the posts here, but here's the bottom line IMHO. The terms organic and sustainable are no more that that - just terms. Someone used the word co-opted - yes, the terms are co-opted.
'Organic' by big agriculture via the USDA and sustainable by the growers that use it but don't understand it. So much for 'organic'.
Sustainable...
Please don't make the argument that sustainable means no outside inputs then state that it's OK to use newspaper for compost (unless you print your own newspaper on paper that you made from your own trees and print with ink you processed from soybeans that you grew on your own land. It's exactly that type of argument that 'co-opts' the term sustainable and renders it useless for others that actually promote valid agricultural practices.
There's a legitimate argument to be presented that if you export any organic material in the form of produce sales, that it depletes certain organic compounds from the soil that can't be replaced without outside inputs. That's categorically incorrect, but even if it were a fact, so what? Replacement nutrients are readily available from legitimate sources that do not involve manufactured compounds.
There are agricultural practices that allow best use of resources and productivity on an ongoing basis - that cycle the nutrients in a 'natural' way that is predictable, safe and reliable.
If you follow the practices and inform your customers of the procedures that you use without the buzz words, then there really is no issue - they make their own choice to buy your products or not.
If I remember correctly, the original issue was the spot use of herbicides to control weeds. Why not if it's used judiciously and responsibly? Can any property in an agricultural area be truly organic? Today the state inspector comes out to your property, inspects the soil and your procedures; certifies you to be 'organic' and as he/she leaves the soy bean farmer 2 miles away begins to spray his/her RUR crop and the spray drifts to your farm. OOPS - no longer organic... but at least you've got that piece of paper.
The buzz words are nothing more than just that - buzz words. As long as we continue to place so much importance on them, we'll be slaves to them and will have to fight the battles that they cause....
Last edited by bill in oh; 05/23/07 at 06:15 AM.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Rate This Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 PM.
|
|