 |
|

03/19/07, 08:58 PM
|
 |
Chicken Mafioso
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: N. TX/ S. OK
Posts: 26,190
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by farminghandyman
The issue here is FREEDOM OF CHOICE.
|
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
JESUS WAS NOT POLITICALLY CORRECT
|

03/19/07, 09:15 PM
|
 |
Very Dairy
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dysfunction Junction
Posts: 14,603
|
|
Quote:
|
• The milk is devitalized.
|
Please explain, in scientific terms, this mysterious process known as "devitalization."
(This is exactly the kind of New Age mumbo-jumbo that ought to serve as a huge red flag to people capable of rational thought.)
Quote:
|
mushroom, I have a choice, if I want to go pick poison ones that is my choice, they do grow in the wild.
|
And if you were eagerly clamouring for the opportunity to eat something that may well sicken you, most would be astute enough to recognize you as a fool.
Because milk seems relatively innocuous, it's more difficult to make the connection in its case, but raw milk -- particularly the kind we're talking about here, milk that presumably is produced commercially, in quantities sufficient for sale to many customers, which makes it much more difficult to ensure quality -- may well be just as dangerous as those mushrooms.
__________________
"I love all of this mud," said no one, ever.
|

03/19/07, 09:22 PM
|
 |
Miniature Horse lover
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Central WI.
Posts: 21,244
|
|
|
I agree there should be laws in place for the sale of Raw Milk, It IS not that good for a person to ---- things like that and has been proved over and over again. but some of you just stick with the greenies on this and that is it. Choice NO there should be things in place to protect people as a Whole, and that is that. And Besides NO Animals Lets their Young Drink ANY Milk after reaching a certain Age They just Don't Need it Period. This saying you should be be drinking milk the rest of your life is just NOT Natural at all in the animal kingdom what makes people think it IS good for humans to do so.
And selling raw milk is taking chances, most people don't know how to handle it, as it doesn't last that long in the frig. WAY TO Rich for one thing especially Jersey Milk. at 6 or 7% Fat. Way to rich for a lot a people to handle that much fat at one time.
Nope there sure should be laws protecting the general public over getting their hands on raw milk. My dad hasn't be able to drink milk or much milk or ice cream for the last 60 years after getting SICK from RAW MILK.
Yes no selling of raw milk WITHOUT the proper certification should be allowed..
|

03/19/07, 09:35 PM
|
 |
le person
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 6,236
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willow_girl
Raw pork is also a food, but if you eat it, you're likely to become very ill.
There are quite a few mushrooms out there that I imagine are quite tasty, but will kill you, too ...
It should go without saying that just because something is tasty is no guarantee of its safety or suitability!
Sadly, at least in the case of raw milk, it appears the government is correct in protecting people from the consequences of their own foolishness and/or idealism.
|
Not in this country.
And actually, according to the Bible, pork isn't food at all. I believe the Bible also tells us to cook meat.
Last edited by southerngurl; 03/19/07 at 09:37 PM.
|

03/19/07, 09:48 PM
|
 |
le person
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 6,236
|
|
|
[QUOTE=willow_girl]Please explain, in scientific terms, this mysterious process known as "devitalization."QUOTE]
Well, what do you think it means? De vital ization. If something devitalizes something it removes that which is vital, in this case vitamins, and beneficial bacteria (and certainly more). Certainly you do not argue that pastuerization does not destroy vitamins, and certainly you believe vitamins are vital for health?
What makes you think man's science has it all figured out anyhow? There are plenty of properties and substances we haven't discovered or understood. Scientiest's ideas on things are constantly changing. You can't say one thing one day, and then the opposite the next without being WRONG on either point, can you? They were wrong about eggs, they were wrong about margarine, they were wrong about the earth's shape, they were wrong wrong wrong over and over again. Now we have it right, right? Why, because now is the present? How very full of ourselves we are, to think we know it all now. Tomorrow we will think we were fools today.
The only thing this whole argument comes down to is freedom of choice. I make the decision on what I eat, not the government. If I want to eat a raw piece of pork (although I can't think of anything worse at the moment), that's MY decision.
|

03/19/07, 09:52 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Willamette Valley, Or
Posts: 540
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DocM
People have died from drinking raw milk. If the state doesn't allow the sales of raw milk for human consumption, then lobby to change the law, don't break the law and then expect people to be supportive of that. There are legitimate reasons to question the processing of any raw milk supply.
|
I 100% agree. A "Cowshare" in SW Wash made 17 people sick with their e.Coli tainted raw milk last year--including 3 children who were intesive care for kidney failure. Theis cowshare was operating in direct defiance of a cease and desist order from the state health dept.
A raw milk dairy is legal in Wash state but they have to be licensed and meet grade A dairy standards like any other dairy. Certain common sense standards have to be met such as having a concrete floor with a drain in the milking parlor and running water so you can clean before and after milking. Teat dips to disinfect and clean the teat before milking.
This particular unlicensed dairy milked the cows in a dirt floor parlor--what happens when cows poop on dirt? It makes poopy mud that is rife with bacteria and can't be washed out. They were bottling the milk in their family kitchen. They weren't testing for e.Coli more than 1 time/month.
A raw milk dairy needs much more stringent testing than a pasturized dairy.
Raw milk is illegal to sell in Oregon except if you have 3 cows or less. Then you can sell raw milk directly to your neighbors who come to your farm and pick it up themselves. No signage, no advertising.
|

03/19/07, 10:04 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Willamette Valley, Or
Posts: 540
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tnborn
should breast milk be pasterized?It is raw milk comes from a mammry gland.
As far as drinking raw cow or goat milk, this is for me to decide. Not the govt.
|
Rather silly argument--I have yet to see a nursing mother standing in a pile of her own excrement and offering her baby a manure covered nipple.
Cows poop wherever, whenever, even while being milked, their teats are located close to their rectum and they don't wear blouses and bras like a nursing human.
|

03/19/07, 10:04 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 660
|
|
|
Does anyone have any info on the cause of kidney failure in small chicldren exposed to e coli? I read an article from the LA times some months ago that led me to understand that it was misguided use of antibiotics that led to massive bacteria die off that caused the kidney failure not the e coli itself. I would be very interested to know if anyone else has further info on this.
|

03/19/07, 10:10 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Willamette Valley, Or
Posts: 540
|
|
|
What I have read is that the toxins excreted by the e.Coli shuts down the kidneys
|

03/19/07, 10:25 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,869
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by farminghandyman
Pasteurization is a poor excuse to cover up unclean conditions and poor health of animals.
|
it's still the answer....
|

03/19/07, 10:37 PM
|
|
|
|
In a perfect world, raw milk poises no more danger than the store bought pasteurized. But in reality, unless you are milking your own cows and in control of the milk from the teet to the fridge, you have no way of knowing if the milk is safe or not. And that's ok if you are making the choice for your own body and no one else's. But the arguments are valid against giving possible tainted milk to small children. You wanna drink it, go ahead. You wanna share it with a 3 yr old, shame on you.
Now, lot of variants in this thread, several issues at hand, but one thing that jumped out at me when I read the first line; Its the monopoly that large milk producers hold over the control of milk in their states. And yes, many states have laws similiar to Ohio's regarding the sell of milk.
They justify the law based on health issues but the real issue at hand is the "control" of all milk sells by a select few. Large dairies and commercial entities do not want the small dairy farmer to be free to compete. And they block this by lobbying for strong laws against the sell of unpasteurized milk.
Easy to influence the boys down at the state capitol to see things your way when you contribute to their campaigns and line their pockets with rolls of $100 bills. Works with oil, works with construction projects, works even with milk. Think about it.
|

03/19/07, 11:49 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 660
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by veggrower
What I have read is that the toxins excreted by the e.Coli shuts down the kidneys
|
This is the relevant part of the article I was talking about :
............ One of the physicians stated that until the results came back, the boy was not to be given antibiotics. In the case of O157:H7, they learned later, antibiotics often caused a mass kill of the bacteria and a mass release of a toxin known as Shiga, which could shut down a child's renal system.
Here is a link to the article:
http://www.latimes.com/features/maga...-home-magazine
I have not read anything about this elsewhere and was curious if other people knew more.
|

03/19/07, 11:57 PM
|
 |
AFKA ZealYouthGuy
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NW Pa./NY Border.
Posts: 11,453
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stinkfinger
In a perfect world, raw milk poises no more danger than the store bought pasteurized. But in reality, unless you are milking your own cows and in control of the milk from the teet to the fridge, you have no way of knowing if the milk is safe or not. And that's ok if you are making the choice for your own body and no one else's. But the arguments are valid against giving possible tainted milk to small children. You wanna drink it, go ahead. You wanna share it with a 3 yr old, shame on you.
Now, lot of variants in this thread, several issues at hand, but one thing that jumped out at me when I read the first line; Its the monopoly that large milk producers hold over the control of milk in their states. And yes, many states have laws similiar to Ohio's regarding the sell of milk.
They justify the law based on health issues but the real issue at hand is the "control" of all milk sells by a select few. Large dairies and commercial entities do not want the small dairy farmer to be free to compete. And they block this by lobbying for strong laws against the sell of unpasteurized milk.
Easy to influence the boys down at the state capitol to see things your way when you contribute to their campaigns and line their pockets with rolls of $100 bills. Works with oil, works with construction projects, works even with milk. Think about it.
|
Good post. I personally give my kids pasteurized milk because we DON'T have a cow or goats and I don't trust the big dairies, etc. BUT... I think people should have the choice if they want to drink it or not.
|

03/20/07, 12:08 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 912
|
|
|
From the smart one in the family: If you are drinking fresh raw milk off off of the farm the bad bugs don't have enough time to harm you. The longer raw milk is in the system the more dangerous it is especially for young kids.
I've looked into the case in Washington and our rules would have worked. If you drink fresh raw milk within a day or two you are much much safer. I believe that you are better drinking raw milk, but you need to have it really fresh.
|

03/20/07, 01:05 AM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NW OR
Posts: 2,314
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BlueJuniperFarm
I think you've been listening to too much government propaganda.
|
Actually, I have a PhD in molecular biology, and an MS in microbiology, and the gov't often listens to me. See, I know a thing or seven about the transmission of disease. Don't preach to me how clean your milk is; if you're not pasteurizing, I guarantee it has pathogens in it. Whether or not its a count high enough to make you ill is the big question - and a risk I'd never put to my children. My milk parlor is as clean as they come, and my goats are as healthy as any - but I don't drink raw milk, and I don't eat raw eggs. You can't look at a healthy animal and have any idea what's hiding in the milk. You can't guarantee a clean udder unless you've somehow sterilized it - and you can't filtered out ALL the bacteria because they're WAY smaller than the porous membrane you filter it through. [good post up until here. Having a PHD doesn't give you the right to be uncivil. - Chuck]
Government propoganda - is that what you call anything you don't understand?
Last edited by Chuck; 03/20/07 at 07:50 AM.
|

03/20/07, 01:06 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 7,425
|
|
|
when I was a small kid, my dad used to bring home raw milk from a local farmer that raised brown swiss cows. It was the best tasting cream I remember as a kid loved it.
I'd be buying it today if I could from a local farmer, but it's illegal. Something about buying raw milk from a commercial plant makes me think it's not safe.
I never died from drinking local farmer milk that I trusted was carefully handled.
If I had my own goat or cow, I'd be drinking raw milk, and would keep the teats and equipment squeeky clean to collect it with and store it properly immediately upon milking.
But then I eat known wild edible mushrooms and all that sort of really dangerous foods including shrimp from polluted waters. Yikes!
__________________
The human spirit needs places where nature has not been rearranged by the hand of man.
|

03/20/07, 01:50 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,094
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DocM
Actually, I have a PhD in molecular biology, and an MS in microbiology, and the gov't often listens to me. See, I know a thing or seven about the transmission of disease. Don't preach to me how clean your milk is; if you're not pasteurizing, I guarantee it has pathogens in it. Whether or not its a count high enough to make you ill is the big question - and a risk I'd never put to my children. My milk parlor is as clean as they come, and my goats are as healthy as any - but I don't drink raw milk, and I don't eat raw eggs. You can't look at a healthy animal and have any idea what's hiding in the milk. You can't guarantee a clean udder unless you've somehow sterilized it - and you can't filtered out ALL the bacteria because they're WAY smaller than the porous membrane you filter it through. Unless you can back up your "ignorance" with hard facts, save your shrill lectures. I've heard 'em all.
Government propoganda - is that what you call anything you don't understand?
|
So what you're trying to say is that you don't drink raw milk. OK.
|

03/20/07, 02:42 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Central WI
Posts: 5,399
|
|
I don't see it as a "control" issue. Some with tinfoil hats may but some see "control" issues everywhere. Once upon a time I saw it as such but then I grew up.
Doc has it right. If it is illegal to sell raw milk then don't do it.
I grew up drinking it on the farm but I don't think I would sell it to people.
Even if your animals and facilities are "squeaky clean" you don't know what is going on inside your animals body.
E coli, salmonella, Campylobacter are not something you can strain out of the milk.If the cow is infected, chances are you won't even know it.
As for the benefits of raw milk, I saw a bunch of links from raw milk but there are a lot of maybes and unsubstantiated blurbs passing as facts there.
according to the JAMA
Quote:
JAMA 252(15): 2048-52.
Meaningful differences in nutritional value between pasteurized and unpasteurized milk have not been demonstrated, and other purported benefits of raw milk consumption have not been substantiated. Conversely, the role of unpasteurized dairy products in the transmission of infectious diseases has been established repeatedly. To effectively counsel patients attracted by the health claims made for raw milk, practicing physicians must understand both the rationale used by proponents of raw milk and the magnitude of the risk involved in drinking raw milk.
|
Hit the CDC website and search for raw milk you'll find plenty of cases where people became sick from raw milk.
If it means that much to you, get your own animal or get the laws changed in your state. Good luck with the second choice as the majority of folks prefer their food to be as safe as possible.
|

03/20/07, 04:38 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,901
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DocM
People have died from drinking raw milk. If the state doesn't allow the sales of raw milk for human consumption, then lobby to change the law, don't break the law and then expect people to be supportive of that. There are legitimate reasons to question the processing of any raw milk supply.
|
Forget where I just read the article..talks about lactose intolerant children who have NO problem with any types of raw milk. Trying to find someone local to buy from for my family .
|

03/20/07, 04:59 AM
|
 |
Very Dairy
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dysfunction Junction
Posts: 14,603
|
|
Quote:
|
Well, what do you think it means? De vital ization.
|
I think it means, "New Age mumbo-jumbo that sounds convincing to the scientifically illiterate."
Quote:
|
y thing this whole argument comes down to is freedom of choice. I make the decision on what I eat, not the government. If I want to eat a raw piece of pork (although I can't think of anything worse at the moment), that's MY decision.
|
Yes, and you would be a fool for doing so, wouldn't you?
__________________
"I love all of this mud," said no one, ever.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 AM.
|
|