Petroleum Pipeline - Page 2 - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Homesteading Questions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 07/28/06, 01:35 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: jefferson county, north florida
Posts: 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveD(TX)
I think the poster mentioned a PETROLEUM pipeline, not high pressure natural gas. Huge difference. Most petroleum lines are low pressure crude.

i have worked in compressor stations on nat gas lines and the discharge pressure from the compressors is 900 psi. i don't know what pressure liquid petroleum pipelines use, but i'm sure it's much, much lower. there's a nat gas pipeline that runs from texas to south florida (the trans-gulf pipeline). it runs through this area about ten miles south of here. i have never heard of an incident involving this pipeline in the last 40 years. i do know of one incident involving a compressor station. big bucks in damage, no serious injuries.

pax
t.f.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07/28/06, 05:58 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,398
Wow, lots of good information from you all. Thank you. I am leaning toward thinking it is safe to have on the property. I might not put any crops near it, and I might not let the kids run around that area (no fireworks!) and I might keep the animals off of that area, but all in all, it doesn't seem so scary. Oh yeah, I might not be too keen to build right next to it either, but that works out well...it's at the opposite end of the acreage from where I would build anyway. I will still ask the questions you all gave me to ask, just to be informed, but I feel much better about it all. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07/28/06, 07:00 PM
Micahn's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ocklawaha, Florida
Posts: 390
A lot of good stuff has been said so far here. But I was thinking about something that I have not seen yet. Would the owner of the land get anything for them putting the pipe line threw their land ? And if it was already there and you bought the land would you get something as well ?
I would think they should give at least a small yearly fee of some sort.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07/28/06, 08:06 PM
ET1 SS's Avatar
zone 5 - riverfrontage
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Forests of maine
Posts: 5,869
No.

Even if you have a high-tension power line running across your land, giving cancer and nervous problems to your cattle. Still nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07/28/06, 09:01 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Gleann Abhann (NE Louisiana)
Posts: 62
Personal opinion - when I looked for land, I wanted it at least 2 miles away from the closest pipeline, railroad, or interstate. That way, if there were a hazmat emergency, I'd be outside the most likely evacuation distance (depending on wind direction).
__________________
Michael & Rebecca (probably Michael, the mouthy one)
parents of Caitlyn, Brendan, Keera & Alanna
keepers of goats, chickens, rabbits, cats & a dog
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07/28/06, 09:26 PM
wr wr is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 11,937
As a rule, you would not be compensated for a pipeline if you purchased land that one is buried under. The reason is that a pipeline is non intrusive and does not affect your ability to utilize your land. Surface installations and wells are different in the sense that there is always something tangible above ground that you have to work around or look at. You would be compensated for pipeline damages if they had to come onto your land and inspect the line or replace any joints that might be necessary.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07/29/06, 04:24 AM
Micahn's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ocklawaha, Florida
Posts: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by wr
As a rule, you would not be compensated for a pipeline if you purchased land that one is buried under. The reason is that a pipeline is non intrusive and does not affect your ability to utilize your land. Surface installations and wells are different in the sense that there is always something tangible above ground that you have to work around or look at. You would be compensated for pipeline damages if they had to come onto your land and inspect the line or replace any joints that might be necessary.
I can think of many reasons a underground pipe line could be intrusive to a land owner. Pool, Pond, Building with basement, And the list can go on and on. Personally I would not buy land with a pipe line on it if I could help it. And I would fight them tooth and nail if they tried putting one on land I owned.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07/29/06, 11:35 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,351
WI--nope, it was a gathering regional line, and there were no depth requirements in that area. That it wasn't on the ground instead of in it fooled the farmer.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07/29/06, 11:46 AM
arabian knight's Avatar
Miniature Horse lover
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Central WI.
Posts: 21,249
I would have NO Problem with it what so ever~!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07/29/06, 01:28 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Micahn
I can think of many reasons a underground pipe line could be intrusive to a land owner. Pool, Pond, Building with basement, And the list can go on and on. Personally I would not buy land with a pipe line on it if I could help it. And I would fight them tooth and nail if they tried putting one on land I owned.

Don't forget, this is at the far end of a forty acre parcel. I will be building on the opposite side of the land so the things you mentioned wouldn't come into play. There is already a pond that is well away from the pipeline, so I have to concur that I don't think it is a problem.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 07/29/06, 01:35 PM
wr wr is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 11,937
I can't think of any time that anyone has ever wanted to put a pool or basement on top of a pipeline but that's not saying it couldn't happen. Usually, a few feet either way is reasonable when building such things. I do find the mentality regarding oil & gas a bit odd. All of us use it, we're all for it's existence but just not in our back yard.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 PM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture