Just for reference...Here is the "controversial" article. - Page 3 - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Homesteading Questions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #41  
Old 07/24/06, 11:12 AM
DrippingSprings's Avatar
In Remembrance
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by homebirtha
And I had no idea that prostitutes frequented livestock auctions? Is that really true? When I first read that paragraph, I thought a hooker must be someone who catches animals or moves them into the sales ring, or something like that. Not actual hookers. lol.
lol thats what i thought she meant tool but someone posting before thought she meant "hooker"
__________________
What we have here...is a failure to communicate.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 07/24/06, 11:15 AM
DrippingSprings's Avatar
In Remembrance
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by homebirtha
A very typical trait of animal hoarders is that they think their animals are worth a lot of money, when they really are not. So I'm not sure that I would believe this woman when she says this Komodor would be worth $350,000 over the course of its life?!?! I don't know many dog breeders who make that much over the course of all their dogs' lives, much less just one. And this is the same dog that was said to have weighed only 42 pounds when it was taken away. Also, it couldn't be a champion if it hadn't ever even been shown yet.

Her rantings on that website really do sound like those of someone with some serious delusions. She thinks that ALL the officials, ALL OF THEM, right up to the governor were in cahoots to take away her animals. Don't you find that a bit, um, farfetched?

Honestly, this is just such a sad story. Sad for those animals that were mistreated. And sad for this woman who clearly seems to need some kind of psychiatric help that she isn't getting.

obviously you didnt watch the special about the corruption of the texas folks. they raided nothing but kennels and farms with registered animals sometimes while animals on neighboring properties actually looked worse. because they knew they could sell the pure breeds alot easier than selling the mutts etc.

thye even had people on the show present at the ''raids'' who were said to be ''vets'' and it turns out most werent even vet tech trained etc.

so when they allow you to ''adopt'' a pet for a sum of 100 or more in ''fees'' you are more likely to want a pure blood as a mutt for that price and the thieves know it.
__________________
What we have here...is a failure to communicate.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 07/24/06, 11:22 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 503
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandB
Pyrnad -

Bless you for helping those poor animals. I have a question unrelated to all this other stuff. How does the duck without feet manage? Did you make some kind of prosthetic for it, or does it manage to walk on its own?
I once saw pictures somewhere of a goose that lost its feet, the owner was able to fix up a pair of baby's sneakers for it to walk on. They would take this goose to visit places where there were handicapped children, they loved seeing the goose with artificial "feet".
She walks just fine. Scar tissue has built up. She lays eggs, sits a nest and does great with her offspring. She even raised some orphaned ducklings last year.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 07/24/06, 11:33 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 503
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Devil TN
It may not fall under the adverse possesion rule if it was all done by one original owner before the split, but if you want to hack at their septic, that's up to you. Were I you I'd bring it up some facts to my attorney and let him do some case law research. I'd bet there was a good chance the answer might surprise you.
I never said I would "hack at their septic system". Lawyer did check the facts. Again adverse posession in Maine is 20 years with the same owner.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 07/24/06, 11:34 AM
harrisjnet's Avatar
Okie with Attitude
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,819
Talk about getting off base with a thread. Who cares how or why Pyrnad got the animals and what some other person said about her in some article. I thought this whole thing was about a boundary dispute and the goings on there.
I don't know Pyrnad or the other people, but I like reading about what is going on. It is like a soap. I do also have my own life and am not taking anything on this forum personal. If it gets too personal for you and things are writen that hurts your feelings here. It is Time For You to STOP and wonder if you may need to get a life and not worry what strangers all over the country may say about you. Perhaps they need a life also and don't have anything better to do. Maybe they are venting here to keep from beating up someone for real. To Quote Dennis Miller, That is my opinion, I could be wrong.
__________________
Don't join a battle of wits if you are unarmed!
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 07/24/06, 11:37 AM
Red Devil TN's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: TN
Posts: 266
Pyr, I gave you the advice, I hope others reading this grasp the 'one owner' thing and do their research accordingly when they purchase. It likely would not fall under the adverse possesion as the owner who placed it owned all the land involved. I'd try for, and likely get, an easment for that. If you want to ignore the possibility, fine. Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 07/24/06, 11:48 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrippingSprings
obviously you didnt watch the special about the corruption of the texas folks. they raided nothing but kennels and farms with registered animals
But this was in Maine? Not sure what a case in Texas has to do with anything?
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 07/24/06, 11:49 AM
DrippingSprings's Avatar
In Remembrance
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by harrisjnet
Talk about getting off base with a thread. Who cares how or why Pyrnad got the animals and what some other person said about her in some article. I thought this whole thing was about a boundary dispute and the goings on there.
I don't know Pyrnad or the other people, but I like reading about what is going on. It is like a soap. I do also have my own life and am not taking anything on this forum personal. If it gets too personal for you and things are writen that hurts your feelings here. It is Time For You to STOP and wonder if you may need to get a life and not worry what strangers all over the country may say about you. Perhaps they need a life also and don't have anything better to do. Maybe they are venting here to keep from beating up someone for real. To Quote Dennis Miller, That is my opinion, I could be wrong.

well because she offered up proof this other woman was less than honest and then it was propose that she was the one not being honest. so a debate on whether or not pyrnad was being 100 percent honest was put out. so we went to the links to try and see who was what and therefore it is all related.
__________________
What we have here...is a failure to communicate.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 07/24/06, 01:10 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dwelling in the state of Confusion - but just passing thru...
Posts: 8,092
Thumbs down

[QUOTE=tsdave]
Im done here, i have said all i have to say,
And everyone lies. And everyone tells the truth. Sometimes
.[/
QUOTE]

So tsdave.....which are we to believe about YOU??? In the past, you've said that ...you were... "done here, I have said all I have to say..." yet you keep on coming back and bad-mouthing pyrnad.......what's YOUR beef with her?

And now you "claim" that "everyone lies.....and everyone tells the truth....sometimes......." just which ....are you doing NOW?!!! PLEASE STOP IT......or this thread will go kaput too!
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 07/24/06, 01:45 PM
harrisjnet's Avatar
Okie with Attitude
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,819
Red Devil TN, are you saying that a prior owner of one or both of the properties in question may have owned it for the 20 yrs required in Maine as statues of limitation?
If so wouldn't any deed or title reflect it?
It looks like any original owner that owned it for the 20 yrs may have won in a court battle, but would it still if they split the land or sold it without it being a legal change in description?
__________________
Don't join a battle of wits if you are unarmed!
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 07/24/06, 02:18 PM
Jolly's Avatar  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 3,604
Allegations of lies, misrepresentations, counter-lies...who cares?

The rubber hits the road when the gavel comes down.

The gavel has fallen, truth has been derived. To deny that simple fact is an agenda in itself.

'Tis the the time for some to admit they have been wrong, perhaps misspoke, or just silently slink away. It would be the honorable thing to do...
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 07/24/06, 03:19 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,259
I've been away for a few days and missed some posts, and I really don't want to stir anything up. But can I ask?? Any new developments in the original saga that started all these offshoots of armchair lawyering and private detectiving on google (ok, probably not a word). Pyrnad, have you heard anything else since the neighbors "orally rejected" your more-than-reasonable offer? Is the For Sale sign still up? I wonder if their realtor has any idea what's going on.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 07/24/06, 03:22 PM
tsdave's Avatar
Grand Marshal
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 231
i do kinda wander if maybe the moving of the barn was the start of the property issues. did maybe they convince themselves her barn was not on her property and was on theirs ? That makes more sense to try and get it moved .....


"They came back with an old lawn mower, and a rototiller.
We are not talking, but I am really getting entertained!!!!!
Thet decided to make a garden!!! Right over the septic tank(right next to my barn). This yard had not been mowed in 2 years. They are using a front tine tiller. They could not understand why it kept getting jammed up with grass(duh)."




"I spoke with the animal control officer. He notified them of the law about LGD's"
... (same post)
"Chief of police stopped to see me before going next door."

That kinds takes on new sense, if you think maybe pyrnad and the animal control and police cheif are buddies. Why did they contact pyrnad first on their way to give the neighbors "the law" ?
__________________
Happiness is directly proportional to the ratio that trees out number humans.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 07/24/06, 03:41 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: CHINA
Posts: 9,569
DANG! And I thought it was my choice who I wanted to be friends with.....didnt know there was a "friend's police" too

All right I'm friends with the tax collecter where my camp is----wouldnt want it to be a secret....and I went to school and played ball with our town clerk

OH man, I forgot I also know a few of the firemen in town and the fire marshall as well.

My sister went to college with the governor.... My daughter met the governor on a field trip---and told him to please not fly so low in his helicopter over our farm when he goes up to Bangor because it scares the animals.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 07/24/06, 03:43 PM
AngieM2's Avatar
Big Front Porch advocate
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 44,425
when I call the cops about a neighbor or something going bump in the late night, they come to my place first for all the facts (patrolman), then to investigate.

Seems reasonable to me.

Angie
__________________
"Live your life, and forget your age." Norman Vincent Peale


Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 07/24/06, 03:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 20
I hate to add to the (mostly) pointless armchair lawyering, but Red Devil's point bears repeating - there could be what is called a "implied easement" for the septic. This can arise where two parcels of land were owned by the same person in the past.

A clearer example of this would be if it was discovered that the bad neighbors' driveway was actually on Pyrnad's land, and there was no other access to the bad neighbors' house. In that case, in many places (not sure about Maine), a court may find that the bad neighbors would have an implied easement, which would allow them to continue using the driveway. In these situations, the length of ownership (i.e., the 20 year period in Maine) is usually irrelevant. What is relevant is whether the owner of the parcel (in this case the bad neighbors) is able to continue using the property without the grant of the easement.

Hopefully, Pyrnad's lawyer is fully aware of this and it doesn't apply.

Someone who has been silently rooting (and routing) for Pyrnad....
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 07/24/06, 04:23 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,259
Maybe if we all just ignore him, he really will go away like he keeps claiming he's going to do... Maybe??? Hopefully...

"Im done here, i have said all i have to say,"
"And everyone lies. And everyone tells the truth. Sometimes."

I think we've got the answer to copperkid's question.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 07/24/06, 04:25 PM
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 15,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by AngieM2
when I call the cops about a neighbor or something going bump in the late night, they come to my place first for all the facts (patrolman), then to investigate.

Seems reasonable to me.

Angie
Me too!

By the way, since Pyrnad seems to not be able to post on any news regarding the saga of the neighbors(without all kinds of nonsense), could someone fill me in by PM...someone who is maybe PMing with Pyrnad.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 07/24/06, 04:39 PM
mightybooboo's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: So Cal Mtns
Posts: 11,301
Give her her own private forum and just spare the rest of us.
No one else is welcome here anyhow,just Pyrnad and her devoted following.Since she has taken control of this forum,get it out of country living and give her her own Forum,then you can all commisurate privately.

As you are demanding the Country living board allow you to do.To establish a private Pyrnad thread/zone.

What a bunch of garbage.

BooBoo

Last edited by mightybooboo; 07/24/06 at 04:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 07/24/06, 04:52 PM
AngieM2's Avatar
Big Front Porch advocate
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 44,425
BooBoo and others who think that this has taken over the forum

It's been 3 or 4 threads, that would have been one if not deleted due to nastiness. Then this and one other thread asking where the others went.

The solution is very simple. If the ones that don't believe, that have to point out at every possible chance that there is probably something that is not being told to us, etc.... didn't post on the thread in a manner to cause the deletion, or closing ----- there would be one thread. One thread out of about 25 or 30 that show on the main page. That is not by any stretch of the imagination taking over a forum.

So, the ones that think there is too much attention, don't post, don't look and it will stay NICE, and there will be only one thread to avoid.

Now isn't that simple?

Angie
__________________
"Live your life, and forget your age." Norman Vincent Peale


Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 AM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture