septic vs. sewer - which is better? - Page 2 - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Homesteading Questions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 07/17/06, 09:39 AM
MELOC's Avatar
Master Of My Domain
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,220
my point about cost and revenue is that a sewer system is very costly to construct and maintain. municipalities never tell the truth about the long term cost. they are often created to allow new and dense development for the benefit of developers. the existing population is forced to connect to help pay for it all.
__________________
this message has probably been edited to correct typos, spelling errors and to improve grammar...

"All that is gold does not glitter..."
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07/17/06, 10:05 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 464
Kalifornia had a huge study done and concluded that septic was in all cases (except neglect) far superior to city sewer. The waste water to the leach field was cleaner, eyc, etc. They passed a law mandating that septic be encouraged anywhere the lots/parcels were big enough to support leach fields.
TOTALLY ignored by local bureaucrats, of course, because of the usual $/power issues.

What we should do is pass laws that anyone who WANTS to be a pol/bureaucrat CAN'T be!!
__________________
You can't ride, til you get on....
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07/17/06, 10:43 AM
Question Answerer
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: ME
Posts: 3,119
http://www.presbyeco.com/prod_enviro.html

I wish I had put one of these in, instead of my normal system.
But if you watch what you put in a system, a septic is better because you have to watch what you put in it. And nothing is "overflowed" into the local lakes...EWWWWWW.
In Newfoundland Canada they used to dump it all into the ocean. EWWW.
__________________
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines.
Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07/17/06, 11:33 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 7,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellebeaux
Wow, you guys raise some good points.

So on my imaginary homestead, what's the ideal way to go? Say that I could get permits, etc. As an intellectual exercise, and for spiritual satisfaction, I would like the homestead to be as self-sufficient as possible. But I can't imagine that anywhere I'd like to live would let me be totally off public utilities!

How can you have a homestead in an area that _does_ have public water/septic utilities????? Generally such locations around here are so regulated, one can't have livestock, dust, noise, etc.....

Much better off with your own well/ septic 'here' but we have lots of water, and farms are big not closely packed.

--->Paul
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07/17/06, 08:24 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: No. Cal.
Posts: 130
We have several "unincorporated pockets" here that are surrounded by city. If sewers are available you are only required to connect if you want to get a permit for remodeling or in the case of financing, FNMA requires connection if sewers are available. The lots tend to be larger because of the former septic systems. This has resulted in neighborhoods with large lots that are in high demand.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 AM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture