
05/21/06, 11:55 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,986
|
|
|
Good points, but if the police are doing this to protect the public at large rather than for their own benefit (I don't know what the officers' motivations were in Campbell Co.), what is the difference? You are protecting your child. They are protecting everyone's child.
Besides what are you going to do with his confession?
You may have the victim's testimony (they could be lying or mistaken) and you may have some "proof" (it may or may not prove anything) and you add to that a confession coerced from someone using physical pain (they could just be confessing to stop the pain).
Now what? You, as a completely biased person and in a highly charged emotional state, are now going to exact justice by killing them?
I think the problem lies with the the judges in this country. A jury convicts someone for a particular crime, then judges give the person weak sentences. It leads to a sense of vigilantism.
Since most judges are elected or appointed by an elected person, we need to be vey careful about who we elect.
Anyway, our system, while not perfect, is better than anything else I have seen and I would place my trust in the police officers of the U.S. over those in any other country.
Last edited by whodunit; 05/21/06 at 11:59 AM.
|