Quote:
|
Please don't use me as an example of not believing in shooting the dog. I believe I also said I don't have a problem with it.
|
I'm sorry if I misrepresented you. I know you said that you didn't have a problem with the shooting, which I do, but when you said you were a softy I thought there was some common ground. I still think it sounds like you do the right thing personally, for whatever reason, and I respect that. It sounds like you put yourself at risk doing so (more from the rednecks than the dogs, the way I hear it), so I would even say that you have a
lot more than "an iota" of compassion.
As for overestimating the risk, I only said that the risk to
humans was overestimated, not the risk to livestock. I'm sure that very many dogs running loose who are perfectly sweet 100% of the time to their humans will exercise their prey drive on livestock and can cause tons of pain and destruction and economic loss. I know that 2 of my three dogs wouldn't hesitate to kill livestock if they ever got loose around any (I seriously believe the third one would starve to death, though), and if one of my dogs got shot with a mouth full of goat hide or chicken feathers, I'd feel terribly sad and guilty, but I also know I wouldn't be in any position to complain. I also said that if you see them posing an immediate danger to you or yours, I wouldn't disagree with you shooting them. If I had to choose between my animals dying or the loose dog, I'd pick the dog. I'd feel bad that it had to die, but I'd feel even worse if it killed my animal. But it doesn't sound like that was the situation here at all, and that's why I very much disagree with the shooting.
Anyway, I've more than said my piece--I just wanted to express support for the original poster and give a hopefully helpful suggestion. Beyond that, it doesn't really matter what I happen to think about the issue and I'll stay out of it from now on unless someone has something specific to say to me.
Good luck to you and your friends cchapman.