First off, I am a liberal, and regretably, am living in a red state. I also have a loaded semi-automatic .22 under my bed and have decided long ago that I will use it if I feel I need to. I believe there are few absolutes in life, but of those few is the fact that I will defend myself and my family. If someone manages to break into my home in spite of a very vocal, territorial Chessie and me yelling warnings, I will shoot, and stop, the intruder. And I don't care if said intruder happens to be the teenager from down the road.
Now, I can sit here typing away with all the self-righteous bravado in the world, since I've yet to be in that situation. However, as tragic as killing another person would be, I feel it would be much more tragic to loose my own life, or even to be attacked and survive, had I second-guessed myself even though I felt threatened.
I agree with what most everyone is saying, if you are unsure or uncomfortable about using a gun, it's best to avoid it. There is absolutely nothing wrong or "wimpy" about it, and there are many other options for safety and self defence. The earlier comment about more homeowners being killed by their own guns is, in my opinion, most likely a result of the gun owner not knowing how to use the gun, being afraid of it, or hesitating to use it although they are being threatened. Keep in mind, an intruder's gotta be pretty close to grab a handgun and turn it on its owner!
Again, I'm a liberal raised by liberals. And both me and my bleeding heart family agree that true gun control is simply being educated and responsible around firearms...be it the Daisy or a cannon. I'm all for the waiting period, but anything beyond that only seems to create difficulty for honest people trying purchase guns legally. I was raised with guns in our home, and from a very young age, my sister and I were taught that they were unconditionally off limits without Dad's supervision. It wasn't so much a rule in our house as it was a law of nature. It was probably the only rule in the house that was not disobeyed at some point by my sister or me!

The "arsenal" was not taboo by any stretch of the imagination, just
very respected.
But anyway, that was my
"utter stupidity of restrictive gun control for the sake of restrictive gun control" soapbox rant. Not too popular in my "demographic"...lol! But then, red or blue, mindless recitation of party lines is just dumb!
Quint, I was also wondering about using a rifle or any other long-barreled firearm in the house, or even outdoors in heavily wooded, brushy areas. (learned that part while trying to sight in the raccoon that had been feasting on the chickens...luckily, the little @#$% was so fat, it was an easy shot!) It just seems that it would be a lot "clunkier" to use than a smaller handgun. Not to mention the fact that even the little .22 would get in the way if I were to take it out with me while doing chores. And if someone is in the house, I would have to imagine that they are well within range for a handgun wielded by reasonably trained shooter with a full magazine.
Oh yeah...Amostthere, you are the best!!

"It's hog boilin' time!" LOL!! Hell, if the buckshot didn't do me in, I'd die laughing!! One way or the other, the job gets done!