
01/04/12, 10:08 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SE Ohio
Posts: 2,174
|
|
|
I purchased a known CAE positive Purebred Nubian doe earlier this fall for a song. I would have bought the other three if I could have been sure I would have gotten Purebred papers on them (and if the sellers had let me). I like to think the sellers would have chose me over the other place. The breeder of the original two sisters had come over and pulled blood for CAE testing. She had discovered she had positives in her herd and did the right thing by testing theirs. They came back positive so these sellers were selling them to start over with clean stock. Quite up front and honest about their condition. Here, Colleen's kids will be pulled and raised on CAE Prevention. She will be given a meat wether to raise or just be milked. The disease stops with her. The does I didn't bring home? They went to a Boer breeder who knew about CAE. He just puts them down if they start to show signs. Hate to think what happens to the doelings who have been infected by being raised on those dams. And all the kids that snitch. It is true that CAE spread faster in goats fed the pooled milk, but kids snitch and CAE is just as prevalent in meat goats as well most likely. With so few going symptomatic, it just doesn't affect their bottom line enough to warrant testing.
A number of meat breeders will buy in dairy does to graft bummers onto and use the milk to feed bottle kids. If it is a herd that does not test, well, the likelihood they might end up with a cheap goat with CAE is possible.
Again we go back to the economics of running a meat herd business. Another $4+ added to the bottom line for each goat. The big show breeders ought to be testing, but since CAE does not affect their bottom line quite as much, and it isn't required in most areas, why would they?
Demanding testing is the first step.
|