
02/03/11, 04:04 PM
|
 |
Hate Oz. Took the shoes.
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SE Kansas
Posts: 2,080
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bfly Farmer
Thanks for posting this. We run our KS farm remotely and it can be hard to keep up with everything.
If you read the bill, dairy will have representation, but it may or may not be even. Out of the seven positions - 2 meat, 1 dairy, 1 feeder, 1 purebred breeder, 2 at large. Dairy people would qualify for at least 4 of the seven positions and if you can get people with mixed herds, that would help. Also, it doesn't say you need to be a member of the KS Meat Goat Ass, but just that elections will be held there. Also, how are they qualifying what is a meat goat vs. dairy? We run San Clementes. They are a dual purpose (meat/dairy). We run one herd for meat and a separate herd for milking. Where would we fall?
But do note that in their mission, there is nothing about promoting goat milk or dairy products, just meat. Isn't that the job of the Ks Meat Goat Ass?
As for the $0.50, that is crazy. There is no way to truly keep track of that and the admin costs would be ridiculous. I would hate to even harzard a guess as to the number of farmers that sell only a handful of goats a year. Are they really going to keep paperwork on someone who is sending in $5 and under a year. It screams big government at work!
Hopefully this will go down in flames!
|
All excellent points!
|