
07/30/04, 05:43 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: OH
Posts: 128
|
|
|
What are you going to use this for, looks or heat. A fireplace is nice to relax by but it sucks up the wood and most of the heat is lost out the flue, a woodstove you may be able to leave the doors open and watch the fire, but then it is more efficient and will save you on the amount of wood you would use, but then again it depends on the wood burner. My dad had a double barrel wood burner and heat the whole house with one in the basement, this seems to be a cheap yet efficient way to go. If you opt for the fireplace they have free standing ones on the market, to me that would be more practical as you would have a 360 degree view of the fire and would radiate heat out all sides compare to one that only did half. It all comes down to how much you want to spend and what you are going to use it for, for looks-fireplace, for heat-woodstove, then there is always the outside wood furnace which even keeps the dirt of the wood chips out of the house and is safer cause if you have an uncontrolled fire it will only hurt your furnace not burn down your house, plus you can burn it different and save even more firewood. Which sells for anywhere from$75 to 200 a cord for split hardwood, depends on where you are at.
Dave
__________________
“When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.” -Thomas Jefferson (1743–1826)
|