
12/19/13, 08:32 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,491
|
|
While I am trying to do less cut and paste, here is the latest information on this subject, straight from the horses mouth, with my highlights
Ag groups say FDA antibiotics rule to have little impact
Tim Hearden
Capital Press
December 17, 2013
Livestock industry groups contend there will be minimal impact from the Food and Drug Administration's new guidelines on antibiotic use, although it could actually lead to more use of such drugs by pork producers.
Citing public health concerns, the government took steps to phase out nontherapeutic use of certain antibiotics in animals processed for meat. The FDA has asked pharmaceutical companies to stop labeling drugs important for treating illness in humans as acceptable for growth promotion in animals.
Drug company Zoetis, a leading manufacturer of animal antibiotics, has already said it will comply.
Groups including the National Cattlemen's Beef Association and the National Chicken Council praised the spirit of collaboration with which the FDA approached the antibiotic issue and vowed to work within the new guidelines.
"This only affects medically important antibiotics for human health (used) for feed efficiency and growth promotion, so I think of it as a narrow subset of a broader set," NCBA spokesman Chase Adams said. "We use very, very few of those in the cattle industry for growth promotion and feed efficiency."
Only about 5 percent of the antibiotics used by pork producers is for feed efficiency and growth promotion, but the drugs have been an important safeguard for piglets who've just been weaned and are more susceptible to bacterial infections, said Dave Warner, spokesman for the National Pork Producers Council.
Full text:
http://www.capitalpress.com/article/20131217/ARTICLE/131219903
|