Lewis and Clark expeditions importance in settling the west? - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Homesteading Questions


Like Tree28Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 11/04/12, 01:28 AM
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 19
Lewis and Clark expeditions importance in settling the west?

Do you think the Lewis and Clark expedition was important in settling the west? Yes? No? Why?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11/04/12, 01:39 AM
Forerunner's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 9,898
No. That expedition was just the one that got the press.

What settled the west was time and persistence.
__________________
“I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.” Barry Goldwater.
III
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11/04/12, 02:06 AM
nobody
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,823
And here I thought North America was "settled" for thousands of years......
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11/04/12, 06:21 AM
Alice In TX/MO's Avatar
More dharma, less drama.
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas Coastal Bend/S. Missouri
Posts: 30,490
It was simply part of the invasion process.
Maura likes this.
__________________
Alice
* * *
"No great thing is created suddenly." ~Epictitus
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11/04/12, 06:31 AM
topside1's Avatar
Retired Coastie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monterey, Tennessee
Posts: 4,660
Flora and Fauna mission, plus exploring the newly acquired Louisiana Purchase...
__________________
TOPSIDE FARMS
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11/04/12, 07:29 AM
HST_SPONSOR.png
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: West Central Arkansas
Posts: 3,611
Started in Arkansas did ya know? The starting point is in a swamp. They only used air rifles as carring powder and shot would be heavy. I think it runs like going to the moon or mars as they did not really know what they would encounter. Just my.02
__________________
:cool: :angel: TRUTH & MERCY
www.dixieflowersoap.com
www.mollyjogger.com
Big D Farm Blog
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11/04/12, 07:57 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 12,674
Absolutely yes.

They did not just go there and come back, with stories to tell.

The entire expedition was fully documented, with detailed surveyed maps, fauna samples and drawings of wildlife seen for the first time, detailed accounts of Indian tribes, etc.

It was not just a really great camping trip.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11/04/12, 08:03 AM
Forerunner's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 9,898
*whispers*

I'll bet PJ was there to witness the whole thing.

He was prolly even the camp cook.

I wonder if the rest of the expedition members would agree that it was more than a great camping trip, with PJ cookin'......


__________________
“I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.” Barry Goldwater.
III
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11/04/12, 08:10 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: W. Oregon
Posts: 8,757
It got people talking and dreaming about homesteading "Out West""....James
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11/04/12, 08:10 AM
Brenda Groth
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,817
as far as "settling the west"..i'm not sure THAT was it's importance..

it was historically and geographically important, a lot of good info was gleaned..but not sure it was important in SETTLING the west.

believe the west was already settled..and hey..what about the vikings !! (i'm norwegian)
__________________
Brenda Groth
http://restfultrailsfoodforestgarden.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11/04/12, 08:20 AM
Haven's Avatar
I agree with Pancho
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,970
I don't know the answer, but the Journals are a pretty good read for anyone looking for a good book over the winter...Read them, then draw your own conclusions.
Jennifer L., greg273 and snowlady like this.
__________________
"For if you start dancing on tables, fanning yourself, feeling sleepy when you pick up a book... making love whenever you feel like it, then you know. The south has got you.”
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11/04/12, 08:26 AM
fantasymaker's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: IL, right smack dab in the middle
Posts: 6,787
Nope not at all ,others had been there, others would come later.
The only thing it did was provide ACCURATE info to the government.

Last edited by fantasymaker; 11/04/12 at 09:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11/04/12, 08:47 AM
ErinP's Avatar
Too many fat quarters...
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SW Nebraska, NW Kansas
Posts: 8,537
I agree with plowjockey.
Yes, others would have come along no matter what. Such is the nature of man. But he's right:
Quote:
The entire expedition was fully documented, with detailed surveyed maps, fauna samples and drawings of wildlife seen for the first time, detailed accounts of Indian tribes, etc.
The had started to unravel the mystery of The West.
__________________
~*~Erin~*~
SAHM, ranch wife, sub and quilt shop proprietress

the Back Gate Country Quilt Shop
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11/04/12, 09:46 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 10,942
The west was settled long before that expedition. The only trouble it was settled by boat from the sea not across the land. The area between St Louis and the sea was unknown and did not have trails marked. In that way it may be responsible but not for the settlement of the coast.
__________________
God must have loved stupid people because he made so many of them.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11/04/12, 10:36 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SE Washington
Posts: 1,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
Started in Arkansas did ya know? The starting point is in a swamp. They only used air rifles as carring powder and shot would be heavy. I think it runs like going to the moon or mars as they did not really know what they would encounter. Just my.02

They only had one air gun that they took along and they did use it from time to time, but mainly to impress the Indians. And no it was not an invasion. It was an exploration to see what there was out west. And we didn't steel the land from the Indians, we took it by controlling it. Just like one tribe would take it by overpowering another tribe.

Everyone thinks that whites are the bad ones, but Indians did the same things the whites did, they had slaves, raided and killed to control and area. Blacks were the same way. In Africa they sold their own family members into slavery and also kept slaves that they stole from other tribes.

Bob
Yldrosie, Gianni and Amadioranch like this.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11/04/12, 11:14 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 208
Their mission was to see what was between the coast and Saint Louis Mo. and to blaze a trail for settlers to follow . It was a very important trip.
I read in their journal how they were so anxious to see and kill a grizzly bear but they soon learned the grizzle was hard to kill . One chased the hunter into the water of the river after being wounded and many times they ran for their lives. I thought it was funny when Lewis wrote that they hope not to see that gentleman again.
Lewis keep a very good record of their travels and if you haven't read them they are on line. I read them all the way to the finish and as they arrived back at Saint Louis I found my self shouting, COME back, lets go again.
Lewis went down hill after the trip and he was in a cabin some where , I think maybe MO. he sent for Clark to come to his aid but one night Lewis killed him self before Clark could get there. Lewis had some sort of mental problems as well as he drank..If you have the time you should read the journal.
http://lewisandclarkjournals.unl.edu...c=LCstyles.xsl
greg273 likes this.

Last edited by patty12; 11/04/12 at 11:26 AM. Reason: add link
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11/04/12, 11:37 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: W. Oregon
Posts: 8,757
Lewis and Clark came in 1803-4. The big migration was after, in the mid 1800's. Gold in the west and the Oregon trail came later. California gold rush was later. A few people were "out west" before, but not the everyday homesteaders....James
ErinP likes this.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11/04/12, 01:37 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington, USA
Posts: 2,900
If you get an "A", do we get a dollar?
Wind in Her Hair and ErinP like this.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11/04/12, 02:18 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,206
Railroads..........

geo
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11/04/12, 03:11 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 16,319
They camped at a spot on the Missouri about a mile from the house I was born in by a creek that ran fresh water into the Missouri. This was on the 4th of July 1803. They called the creek Independance Creek. Few people I knew KNEW how it got its name when I was a kid. That creek was a devider in part from our farm and my Uncle Milt and Aunt Berts farm. Me and bro like to drowned in it once learning how to swim.
plowjockey likes this.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 PM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture