
01/01/04, 08:49 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,622
|
|
|
The real philosophical point of a CSA is that the members share the risk with the farmer. So if tomatoes fail, no one gets tomatoes, including the farmer, who often has a CSA in addition to other sales, like farmers markets and restaurant accounts. In a typical farming scenario, the farmer would take all of the financial hit. The CSA allows the risk to be spread throughout the consumer chain. Some farmers will refund part of the money or buy in produce from another farmer to fill the gap. Others may supplement the share with another product, like bread or honey to make up the difference. Still others say, "Tough," since that's what their members signed up for. I guess it all depends on your philosophy. To focus on the fact that you (the farmer) are out the cost of the seed and labor misses the bigger issue, which is the fact that your customer is out the produce they paid for, and you're also out the value from the produce you've lost, even if that's only what you would have frozen or canned for your own use.
Our plan is to buy in if something fails, but only after we determine it's important enough to make a big difference in the retention rate of our CSArs.
|