Happy farmers, court ruling. - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Homesteading Questions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 06/22/10, 08:57 AM
In Remembrance
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Central Kansas
Posts: 11,076
Happy farmers, court ruling.

There will be a lot of happy farmers today with the supreme court ruling allowing GM alfalfa. There will also be a lot of disgruntled other folks to counterbalance the ruling.
__________________
My family---bEI
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06/22/10, 09:05 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 8,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Windy in Kansas View Post
There will be a lot of happy farmers today with the supreme court ruling allowing GM alfalfa. There will also be a lot of disgruntled other folks to counterbalance the ruling.
Of course the court ruled for the GM hay Guess who owns them
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06/22/10, 09:10 AM
Patt's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ouachitas, AR
Posts: 6,049
Kinda nice what with Monsanto having their own man on the court.....

I am disappointed.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06/22/10, 09:19 AM
In Remembrance
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Central Kansas
Posts: 11,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patt View Post
Kinda nice what with Monsanto having their own man on the court.....

I am disappointed.
And you would be one of the aforementioned counterbalances to a happy farmer. You're not alone for certain.
__________________
My family---bEI
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06/22/10, 09:26 AM
Self-sufficient newb!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 722
Quote:
There will be a lot of happy farmers today with the supreme court ruling allowing GM alfalfa. There will also be a lot of disgruntled other folks to counterbalance the ruling.
GM is a rising wave in the modern world. I don't think we'll be able to do much aside from slowing it down. That said how do we preserve, maintain, and supply/acquire natural varieties in the face of this growing trend?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06/22/10, 09:41 AM
Patt's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ouachitas, AR
Posts: 6,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prismseed View Post
GM is a rising wave in the modern world. I don't think we'll be able to do much aside from slowing it down. That said how do we preserve, maintain, and supply/acquire natural varieties in the face of this growing trend?
Good question!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06/22/10, 10:27 AM
In Remembrance
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Central Kansas
Posts: 11,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prismseed View Post
That said how do we preserve, maintain, and supply/acquire natural varieties in the face of this growing trend?
The same way we fondly remember old airplanes, autos, etc., buy putting them in a preservation unit such as a museum or in the case of plants in a germplasm storage facility. http://www.ars-grin.gov/npgs/acc/acc_queries.html

One may even request seeds for research from the facility. The request may or may not be filled however. http://www.ars-grin.gov/npgs/orders.html

That addresses the older and known varieties. Natural varieties----keep looking just as researchers do.
__________________
My family---bEI
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06/22/10, 11:02 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,522
Diversity of germplasm is extremely important, and that means preserving germplasm that is INTACT and UNALTERED. GM crops could and probably are the dominant varieties in certain monoculture fields--corn, soy, etc. Like the dangers of monocropping that farmers discovered in the past, we absolutely cannot afford to have GM/Monsanto products become the dominant varietites being grown. Feel sorry for those who live next to big farms where the pollen drifts...

Having said that, I request germplasm from the USDA/GRIN system all the time. One must carefully research the accessions of various materials and make sure they are available (not in quarantine, etc) because the people filling the requests don't have time to fill one that merely says "I want X kind of green bean". You should also have a legitimate reason for requesting other than "I want genetically pure, neat, or funky old varieites of vegetables". You would likely be referred to find a retail source. And be prepared to pay shipping, because it has become too expensive for the USDA to ship quantities of seeds or plant material; they suggest getting a Fed Ex account to which they can charge your shipping fees at the time of shipment.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06/22/10, 11:11 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SE Washington
Posts: 1,407
Windy,

Most times they will supply seed if you request it all they would like back is information on it. I work for the USDA/ ARS NPGS mainly with cool season grasses and safflower. In the past they would send to anyone, but it got so they had so many requests from people just wanting the seed and with no intentions of giving info back that they changed their policy.

Also we do not knowingly have any GMO's in the grass and safflower collection. I don't fully agree with the use of GMO's, but there may be a time and place for them.

Bobg
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06/22/10, 11:24 AM
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 17,225
Maintaining alfalfa genetics here will be no problem, alfalfa doesn't set seed here.
__________________
Flaming Xtian
I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.
Mahatma Gandhi


Libertarindependent
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06/22/10, 11:51 AM
Patt's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ouachitas, AR
Posts: 6,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Windy in Kansas View Post
The same way we fondly remember old airplanes, autos, etc., buy putting them in a preservation unit such as a museum or in the case of plants in a germplasm storage facility. http://www.ars-grin.gov/npgs/acc/acc_queries.html

One may even request seeds for research from the facility. The request may or may not be filled however. http://www.ars-grin.gov/npgs/orders.html

That addresses the older and known varieties. Natural varieties----keep looking just as researchers do.
Yeah well what about the people who save their own seeds and will be forced not to because they live next door to someone with GMO's planted? Once again the rights of the individual have been mowed down in favor of the profits of a big corporation.

So what happens when all the seed banks run out and all the seed is contaminated?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06/22/10, 12:28 PM
In Remembrance
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Central Kansas
Posts: 11,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patt View Post
So what happens when all the seed banks run out and all the seed is contaminated?
I absolutely do not believe even for the briefest of a second that would ever occur. Do you think even for a second that that is a remote possibility? If the seed banks run low on a variety they will simply stop sending it out, at least until it can be replenished.

But to answer the question----we'll simply grow GM crops. I believe the figure for U.S. grown soybeans is already at 90% genetically modified.
__________________
My family---bEI
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06/22/10, 01:03 PM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,491
That's the best news I've heard all month. The heavy clay soil around here is difficult to get plowed up and smoothed/fitted to a nice smooth hayfield. It takes a lot of fuel to turn over and disc down a field. I'll save on fuel by not needing to plow as often. The higher protein in the weed free hay is better for my livestock. There will be less erosion of the topsoil because I won't have to open up the fields as often.
The radical examples sited by the anti-Monsanto fringe were an embarrassment to informed small farmers. "What I don't understand, I fear and therefore oppose." seems to be their motto.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06/22/10, 01:09 PM
Patt's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ouachitas, AR
Posts: 6,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Windy in Kansas View Post
I absolutely do not believe even for the briefest of a second that would ever occur. Do you think even for a second that that is a remote possibility? If the seed banks run low on a variety they will simply stop sending it out, at least until it can be replenished.

But to answer the question----we'll simply grow GM crops. I believe the figure for U.S. grown soybeans is already at 90% genetically modified.
Thanks for ignoring the point of my question. What about for those of us who do NOT want GMO's? Obviously if 90% of soybeans in America are now GMO my scenario is not so far fetched now is it?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06/22/10, 01:12 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: north central WA
Posts: 2,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sawmill Jim View Post
Of course the court ruled for the GM hay Guess who owns them
The 7-1 decision issued today by the Supreme Court was on the appeal of the Center for Food Safety's (CFS) successful suit, which resulted in a ban on GMO alfalfa. And, while the High Court ruled in favor of Monsanto by reversing an injunction that was part of the lower court's decision, more importantly, it also ruled that the ban on GMO alfalfa remains intact, and that the planting and sale of GMO alfalfa remains illegal.
__________________
Trisha in WA
Visit my blog @
Diamond Belle Ranch

What else does a man have to do in his short time here on earth than build soil and feed people~Forerunner
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06/22/10, 01:24 PM
byexample's Avatar
Seeking Sustainability
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Painted Desert, Arizona
Posts: 315
GMOs are a ticking time-bomb. I have every confidence that our descendants will look back on this time period and ask "what the hell were they thinking??!!". No long-term studies have been conducted to determine the long-term health effects of consuming GMOs. That's a really bad sign if you ask me. And when one considers things like the "terminator gene" that's getting added to these franken-foods it seems like the big corporations want to fully control the food supply. Once that happens we're all slaves.

Every time humans try to "improve" upon nature there are horrific, unintended consequences. This is one of the primary motivators for us in our decision to grow and raise the majority of our food. I simply don't want to sustain my body via someone's science project.

And I refuse to economically support and reward those practices.
__________________
Patrick Harris
http://ByExample.com
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06/22/10, 01:48 PM
In Remembrance
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Central Kansas
Posts: 11,076
Interesting info added. From the news stories I'm reading now the ban has been lifted on the sale of the seeds, but if farmers buy them they are not allowed to plant them until the USDA does more research and tells them that they can.
__________________
My family---bEI
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06/22/10, 02:28 PM
sammyd's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Central WI
Posts: 5,399
Quote:
terminator gene
A lie perpetuated by anti GM folks.
There is no terminator gene currently used in GM products.
__________________
Deja Moo; The feeling I've heard this bull before.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06/22/10, 02:41 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 7,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by byexample View Post
And when one considers things like the "terminator gene" that's getting added to these franken-foods it seems like the big corporations want to fully control the food supply.
You kind of torpedo yourself with this claim.

While there was some work done on a terminator gene, it proved to not really work out, and has never been used in any seed sold. It is not actively being worked on any more at this time.

The idea behind it was to control the cross-breeding of gmo crops with other crops - something everyone anti-gmo in this thread is asking for!

Think about it - if the terminator gene was actually being used, there would be no chance for cross-pollination would there?????

I can accept if you wish to be anti-gmo. But please become educated on the topic if you wish to speak out about it.

--->Paul
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06/22/10, 03:01 PM
free leonard peltier
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 2,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by rambler View Post
You kind of torpedo yourself with this claim.

While there was some work done on a terminator gene, it proved to not really work out, and has never been used in any seed sold. It is not actively being worked on any more at this time.

The idea behind it was to control the cross-breeding of gmo crops with other crops - something everyone anti-gmo in this thread is asking for!

Think about it - if the terminator gene was actually being used, there would be no chance for cross-pollination would there?????

I can accept if you wish to be anti-gmo. But please become educated on the topic if you wish to speak out about it.

--->Paul
Every time humans try to "improve" upon nature there are horrific, unintended consequences.

Gene or no gene.. whatever. The quote from him I put in bold though, will in my opinion be 100% true for eternity.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 PM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture