Wisconsin Property Taxes and Farms - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Homesteading Questions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 02/23/10, 12:28 PM
PhilJohnson's Avatar
Cactus Farmer/Cat Rancher
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 1,974
Wisconsin Property Taxes and Farms

On my quest to lower my property taxes as much as possible I have noticed that my little 4.37 acre parcel with a couple of run down buildings on it has a taxable value of 4000 dollars. There is only one building standing on this parcel, a three sided leantoo built from telephone poles and used sheet metal. Meanwhile the fella up the road has a 38 acre farm field that has a taxable value of 7200 bucks. Both my parcel and his are actively farmed and they are both zoned agricultural. Could anyone explain to me why my parcel has a taxable value of 918 dollars per acre and his has a taxable value of 189 dollars per acre?
__________________
http://www.xanga.com/shackman A blog about whatever

Last edited by PhilJohnson; 02/23/10 at 01:46 PM. Reason: Grammer Police
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02/23/10, 01:17 PM
where I want to's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: True Northern California
Posts: 13,456
Ask your assessor or tax dept. These things are no secrets- they should tell you what makes different assessed values. Just be pleasant when you call.
Could be a million things from your land being all buildable to zoning issues to some sort of homesteading provision- could be almost anything including a mistake.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02/23/10, 03:02 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 7,609
It could be anything.

Perhaps your land is zoned residential (used for mcmanshions) and the neighbor's is zoned agricultural.

The farmland as zoned has less developmental options, and is worth less per acre.

The small plot is only good for plopping a house on & being worth a whole lot. Some states allow farmed land to get the cheaper assessment, but can be a lot of hoops to jump through.

Just a guess?

Talk to the county tax office.

--->Paul
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02/23/10, 03:22 PM
Unregistered-1427815803
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
around here they like to go by road frontage. An acre with 200 ft road frontage is likely to be appraised higher than 3 or 4 acres with no road frontage.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02/23/10, 03:55 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: MN
Posts: 1,881
There are a million things that it could be. Give the assessor's office a call and they will explain it to you. And please be nice, they are people too!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02/23/10, 04:43 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 799
It is hard to believe such cheap tax valuations exist in Wisconsin. In Oneida county, they now assess at 100% evaluation. In Forest County, assessments often EXCEDE market value.

Your 4 acre parcel that is assessed at $4000 is likely assessed in this manner because it may be used as a residential building lot.
The bigger acreage parcel is undoubtedly agricultural land. Wisconsin taxes ag land at a far lower rate than lots with the potential to become residential building lots.

It still is hard to believe that any Agricultural land in WI has a meager tax valuation of only $7200 for 38 acres. We all know that this is WELL BELOW fair market value.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02/23/10, 04:55 PM
PhilJohnson's Avatar
Cactus Farmer/Cat Rancher
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 1,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoop View Post
It is hard to believe such cheap tax valuations exist in Wisconsin. In Oneida county, they now assess at 100% evaluation. In Forest County, assessments often EXCEDE market value.
In my township the average property tax levy is 16 dollars per 1000 dollars of value. I think that seems a little on the high side.
__________________
http://www.xanga.com/shackman A blog about whatever
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02/23/10, 08:08 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ne colorado
Posts: 1,205
the smaller the parcel the more valuable it is because it sells for more per acre. also its probably already to build on with utilitys close. talk to the acessor, it can't hurt.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02/23/10, 08:31 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 5,069
Quote:
In my township the average property tax levy is 16 dollars per 1000 dollars of value
Jeese Phil thats even higher than my Alaska property!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02/23/10, 08:47 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Central WI
Posts: 834
I agree that you need to call the office and ask. Just an FYI to add on, there are different classifications of ag land, according to what is is being used for. For instance, good crop ground is, I believe, taxed at a higher rate than pasture. Might your land also have been purchased more recently than the larger parcel? That will always bring up the taxes.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02/23/10, 08:59 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 7,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilJohnson View Post
In my township the average property tax levy is 16 dollars per 1000 dollars of value. I think that seems a little on the high side.
Your 4 acres must be worth about $30,000 or so tho, not $4000? So it's all kind of an artificual setup, they keep the valuation terrible low, and then jack up the tax rate to increadable high, and it comes out the same as any other state.

Here in MN they value the land about what it was worth 12 months ago, and base the tax rate off the total valuation, not some cheap valuation rate like you have.

So, our tax rate might seem low, but I have a 40 acre field they value at $140,000 and base taxes off the $140,000. About 7-10 acres of that 40 acres is a wetland that I can't do anything with but cut hay if it dries down enough. No building, no tiling, no draining. I'd _love_ to have your valuation rates!

We get homestead credits in some odd magical formula, if qualify then about 40% reduction in taxes if we live on the property up to some level.

--->Paul
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02/23/10, 09:03 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 7,609
Heck, I have a 4.25 acre woodlot with a rr right of way cutting it up, a stream through it, the rest is pretty much a cliff, no access at all, got wintertime cartway access over frozen ground to get firewood is all.

That property is valued at $10,000 and $30 tax for what is deemed unaccessable waste land.

--->Paul
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02/23/10, 09:15 PM
PhilJohnson's Avatar
Cactus Farmer/Cat Rancher
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 1,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by rambler View Post
Your 4 acres must be worth about $30,000 or so tho, not $4000? So it's all kind of an artificual setup, they keep the valuation terrible low, and then jack up the tax rate to increadable high, and it comes out the same as any other state.

--->Paul
I paid 30,000 for the whole place which has a well, septic, and a house which is on a separate parcel that is right next to the 4 acre one.
__________________
http://www.xanga.com/shackman A blog about whatever
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02/23/10, 10:09 PM
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Zone 7
Posts: 10,559
the farmer has a 38 acre field.
you have land with buildings and part of you holdings are considered a building parcel.
the building parcel is not in the deferral for farm use and is taxed based on its potential use
__________________
Agmantoo
If they can do it,
you know you can!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02/23/10, 10:55 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 799
I don't know if you know this, but property taxes in WI are somewhat unfair.

My house/land in Oneida County has a fair market value of approx $175,000. The valuation is (I think) close to the actual market value. So property taxes are roughly 1% of the FAIR MARKET VALUE.
But not always.

The well heeled don't pay anywhere close to 1% in this township. Bob Felland has a very nice house/land. Its for sale for $10,000,000. His house/land is assessed at only $2,000,000 and his property taxes are $18,000.

Another well off guy in town has a very nice new house. Its not for sale, but certainly would have to be worth over $8,000,000. His home is assessed at $1.8 Million and his taxes are $16,000.

I have a 2nd house in Forest County. Its assessed at $191,000. Its been for sale for 2 years for $130,000 (without so much as a lowball insulting offer). Property taxes are $2400.

Tax assessments may be totally irrelevant. Sometimes they're too high. Other times they're too low. The only thing that matters is the tax bill.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02/24/10, 12:42 AM
PhilJohnson's Avatar
Cactus Farmer/Cat Rancher
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 1,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoop View Post
I don't know if you know this, but property taxes in WI are somewhat unfair.
Oh I know

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoop View Post
The well heeled don't pay anywhere close to 1% in this township. Bob Felland has a very nice house/land. Its for sale for $10,000,000. His house/land is assessed at only $2,000,000 and his property taxes are $18,000.

Another well off guy in town has a very nice new house. Its not for sale, but certainly would have to be worth over $8,000,000. His home is assessed at $1.8 Million and his taxes are $16,000.
My one neighbor owns about 350 acres of land with a machine shed and shop (no house). Total taxable value on that thing is $240200. His property taxes were close to $13,000. Sounds like those folks in your township are getting a screaming deal compared to this guy.
__________________
http://www.xanga.com/shackman A blog about whatever
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02/24/10, 06:12 AM
Wisconsin Ann's Avatar
Happy Scrounger
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South Central Wisconsin
Posts: 13,635
A while back I posted a sort of similar question....our taxes more than tripled this year. Following the advice I received here, I eventually found out that our farm had been put in as "recreational" for tax purposes. The land on 2 sides of us (west and south) is recreational, north and east are ag of some sort. so...we went from the lowest tax rate for Ag, to the VERY high recreational. all because the assessor didn't see the BIG garden, and the REALLY BIG polebuilding and the hayfield...and the turkeys and chickens.

Give your assessor a call.
__________________
"A good photograph is knowing where to stand. - Ansel Adams
(and a lot of luck - Wisconsin Ann)
Rabbits anyone? RabbitTalk.com

Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02/24/10, 07:47 AM
sammyd's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Central WI
Posts: 5,399
You must make sure it's not recreational. BILs dad had his whole 120 acres switched to rec after he quit farming and let his land go back to wilderness....
Quite a shocker to the old guy.
__________________
Deja Moo; The feeling I've heard this bull before.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02/24/10, 01:47 PM
GREENCOUNTYPETE's Avatar
Moderator
HST_MODERATOR.png
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: WISCONSIN
Posts: 6,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilJohnson View Post
In my township the average property tax levy is 16 dollars per 1000 dollars of value. I think that seems a little on the high side.

Phill down here it is more than that in sothern wi and they are raising it every year my previos house was assessed at 73,000 it started with 1900 in taxes i was at 2400 after owning it 4 years and i moved this house stated assesed at 93,000 and had 2000 in taxes and is now at 2440 4 years later and they want more

you could say yes but there are more jobs down there , but Green county compares better with nothern counties than most would know , and laffiette and grant are right there also

part of it may be that you have less than 20 acers so you are not a "REAL"
farm we have freinds with 17 acers who ran into that problem.

school taxes alone can go up 2.5% in wis every year and do they actualy claim they need 4.5 to 5% every year as that is what they say they need to keep up with inflation that is why almost every school district has had a refurendum to raise taxes above the 2.5 % annualy


but the state while still not balancing a budget has been trying but they keep doing it by with holding more and more of the state income tax from the municiplaities , so property tax payers get to make up for it.
the school funding model we currently work on was a short term fix till they could come up with somthing better back in 1993 they thought they could have an aswer in 3-5 years 17 later it is still broke , and at least we still have the 2nd best rated schools in the USA , now if we could loose madison and milwakee we could be #1

"there is nothing more perminant than a temporary fix" - not sure who said it but they were wise.

hey but this being said we are still doing better than many of the other states that sit on the verge of bankrupsy , think california ,i here michigan was might close also.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 AM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture