Taking a Poll what type of land has more value to you.... - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Homesteading Questions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 03/11/09, 06:59 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 137
Taking a Poll what type of land has more value to you....

Gently rolling cleared pasture or gently rolling wooded land?

I know it is all a personal preference just taking a poll out of pure curiosity.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03/11/09, 07:09 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MN
Posts: 444
I think both have value and I would look for land that has some of both, if possible. If I absolutely had to choose, I'd pick the wooded land, because woods usually don't require a lot of labor, but there are a lot of ways that they benefit you--firewood, timber sales, shade, lumber, wildlife havens (so that you can hunt), etc.
__________________
And how am I to face the odds
Of man's bedevilment and God's?
I, a stranger and afraid
In a world I never made.
--A. E. Housman
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03/11/09, 07:13 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Newfoundland, Canada
Posts: 1,120
id prefer a combination of both. cleared fields with treed areas for cover for animals shade and for a more well rounded eco-system.

dean


running water on the property would make it heaven on earth for me.
__________________
Hope is something you give yourself in your darkest moments, this is the true meaning of selfreliance.

greetings from the far east of the western world
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03/11/09, 07:19 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 219
I like both. Our land is half gently rolling and half wooded and hilly. I love it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03/11/09, 07:23 PM
swamper
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lavndrgrl View Post
Gently rolling cleared pasture or gently rolling wooded land?

I know it is all a personal preference just taking a poll out of pure curiosity.

Thanks.
Very wet swampland, if one is a deer hunter and wants a big one.
__________________
United states of America

Born July 4, 1776

Died November 4, 2008

Suicide
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03/11/09, 07:24 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NW Georgia
Posts: 7,205
As stated above, it's best to have both, but usually cleared land has more value than wooded lots.
__________________
"Luck is the residue of design" - Branch Rickey
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03/11/09, 07:24 PM
EDDIE BUCK's Avatar  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Eastern N.C.
Posts: 8,834
I agree too,some of both. Only one, I'd take the trees,cause I like some trees and it will take longer to grow some, than I have time left waiting for them to grow. lol Eddie Buck
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03/11/09, 07:32 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: central, pa
Posts: 113
I'll take the woods. It's already planted, good for lumber or firewood, critter hunting and you DON'T HAVE TO MOW IT.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03/11/09, 07:51 PM
BlackWillowFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 1,309
My dad was in real estate for many years. He always told me wooded land was worth more because of the timber value. He sold several thousand dollars worth of trees from his land. I know of someone who's parents got over $100,000.00 for trees cut off their property.

I think the value is really in what you want to do with the land, but for an investment, seems like trees would be worth more than open fields.
__________________
~Carla~
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03/11/09, 08:22 PM
DaleK's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: East-Central Ontario
Posts: 3,862
Reply

Depends on the woods and the price. I've seen some very worthwhile woods that were pretty undervalued, and others that won't be worth anything for 30 years that were way overpriced. Same for land.
__________________
The internet - fueling paranoia and misinformation since 1873.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03/11/09, 08:57 PM
lonelytree's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,675
Lakefront
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03/11/09, 09:27 PM
ErinP's Avatar
Too many fat quarters...
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SW Nebraska, NW Kansas
Posts: 8,537
"Cleared" pasture??
Where I'm from, that's how God made it in the first place. No "clearing" involved.

We've looked at more than one job in the mountains (ie, trees) and I don't like it. I feel claustrophobic. So, for my part I'd pick pasture any day so I can see!
__________________
~*~Erin~*~
SAHM, ranch wife, sub and quilt shop proprietress

the Back Gate Country Quilt Shop
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03/12/09, 09:30 AM
Danaus29's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 19,346
You can always clear out some of the trees. But it takes a long time for trees to grow to a decent size. I'd take the woods.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03/12/09, 09:50 AM
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Zone 7
Posts: 10,559
Any land that has a unique feature has more value. The features could be water front (lake, ocean, river front), great views, proximity to recreation, remoteness, etc. Anytime that I am purchasing tree farming land I look for the "feature" as I may need or want to sell the property in the future. I have intercostal waterway property, mountain view, remote, large lake access as an example. The land that touches water is always the one that appreciates the fastest and the most and will sell first when put on the market. My best buys are woodland. Few people value the trees and are of the mindset they are selling the land. I have seen the trees bring more than the buyer paid for the property. If you sell, put the price on the property with or without the trees and have a forester evaluate the trees so you know what you have. Additionally, if you buy property with trees have a forester to determine the value of the trees to establish the basis. Keep this information on a formal document. The IRS may question you and you will need it. This basis is your investment in the trees and if you market some of the trees later this is a deduction on the income. Should you have a disaster this basis is proof of your loss.
__________________
Agmantoo
If they can do it,
you know you can!

Last edited by agmantoo; 03/12/09 at 10:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03/12/09, 10:58 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 1,656
Humm, if less than 5 acres I'd prefer the open land, more than 10 acres wooded, anything between would be a toss-up.
But then it would also have a lot to do with what the land was going to be used for?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03/12/09, 11:25 AM
MushCreek's Avatar  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida and South Carolina
Posts: 2,167
I prefer wooded. We looked at both, and 5 acres of field doesn't look like nearly as much as 5 acres of woods. There's not much privacy in the middle of a field, unless it's a really big field. Plus, as others stated, you have firewood, etc. My trees range up to 100 years old; I certainly don't have enough time to raise new ones! I'll clear enough room for a house and garden, with the rest of it being lovely woods.
__________________
"What one generation tolerates, the next generation embraces." -John Wesley
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 AM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture