Please explain new housing bill in English - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Homesteading Questions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 06/25/08, 08:20 AM
We're gettin' there!
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NW TN
Posts: 938
Question Please explain new housing bill in English

I read this article this morning and was hoping some of you here could explain it in everyday English. How will this affect the current renters waiting to be first time home buyers? (bold emphasis added by me) I would really appreciate ya'lls thoughts on this, as I most certainly do not speak "politics"! Dh and I are wondering if this is the right time, economy wise, to buy land for our new homestead and I'm worried if this new bill would be a pro or con to our plans.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080625/...ngress_housing

"Senate may pass mortgage aid plan as soon as today"

WASHINGTON - A mortgage aid plan is on track for passage in the Senate as soon as today. The massive foreclosure rescue bill cleared a key Senate test yesterday by an overwhelming margin, with Democrats and Republicans both eager to claim election-year credit for helping hard-pressed homeowners.

The mortgage aid plan would let the Federal Housing Administration back $300 billion in new, cheaper home loans for an estimated 400,000 distressed borrowers who otherwise would be considered too financially risky to qualify for government-insured, fixed-rate loans.

An 83-9 vote put the plan on track for Senate passage as early as Wednesday, but President Bush is threatening a veto, and Democrats are fighting each other over key details. Those challenges will probably delay any final deal until mid-July.

The bill advanced as separate reports underscored rising economic anxiety: Consumer confidence slid to its lowest level in more than 16 years, and closely watched indices showed a continuing decline in home values.

At the Capitol, Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, D-Conn., the Banking Committee chairman, said the lending measure "would allow us to begin to put a tourniquet on the hemorrhaging of foreclosures in this country."

"We need to demonstrate to people in this country that have lost an awful lot of faith in almost everything, but certainly in (Congress), that we can get something done, that we can put aside differences and make a difference in their lives," Dodd said.

Still, conservative Democrats known as "Blue Dogs" are concerned about how to pay for the measure, and members of the Congressional Black Caucus call it unacceptable, arguing it doesn't do enough to address the needs of black Americans.

Congressional leaders also are divided on how high to place loan limits that apply to government mortgage insurance and financing. The Senate bill sets those limits at $625,000 while a House-passed version puts them at $730,000 — a crucial difference in high-cost housing markets like California, home to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Lawmakers have been negotiating behind the scenes with the Bush administration to avert a veto. Dana Perino, the White House spokeswoman, told reporters the Senate measure has "some really good aspects" and Congress is "on the right path."

"We have been working closely with them to try to change the bill in a way that we think that it could be something that the president could sign," Perino said.

Borrowers would be eligible for the housing rescue if their mortgage holders were willing to take a substantial loss and allow them to refinance, and if they could show an ability to make payments on the new loan. They would ultimately have to share with the government a portion of any profits they made from selling or refinancing their properties.

The bill also would tighten controls and create a new regulator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage giants that provide huge amounts of cash flow to the home loan market by buying loans from banks.

It would provide a $14.5 billion array of tax breaks, including a credit of up to $8,000 for first-time homebuyers who buy in the next year. And it would boost low-income tax credits and mortgage revenue bonds. The measure falls $2.4 billion short of covering the costs of those tax items, a sort point for Blue Dogs who oppose initiatives that add to the deficit.

Mixing in a controversy involving lawmakers, Republicans and Democrats on the Ethics Committee proposed adding mortgage disclosure requirements for members of Congress to the bill following a flap over reports that Dodd and Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., got preferential home loans from Countrywide Financial Corp., a lender at the center of the subprime mortgage mess. The proposal by John Cornyn of Texas, the senior Republican on the committee, and Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., the chairman, would remove an exception that currently allows lawmakers to omit home mortgages from their annual financial disclosures.

On the broader bill, the 42 House members of the Black Caucus said in a letter to Democratic leaders last week that it has "glaring omissions," including affordable housing funds for states affected by Hurricane Katrina and grants for states and localities to buy and fix up foreclosed properties.

To draw GOP support, Senate Democrats diverted the affordable housing money to pay for the foreclosure aid program.

Some Republicans, however, are still vehemently opposed to the legislation, which they describe as a government giveaway for reckless lenders and investors.

"They expect the federal government to turn their backs on responsible lenders and borrowers and renters waiting — waiting — to become first-time homeowners, and support those groups that have pushed our housing market into decline with bad loans and bad investments," said Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyo. "This bill is a federal government bailout."

The Senate bill would provide $3.9 billion in grants to deal with foreclosed properties — a House plan would provide $15 billion — but the White House singled out the funds in its veto threat, and Blue Dogs are demanding that the money be offset with cuts elsewhere.

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the Financial Services Committee chairman, has said he'd be willing to jettison the money and add it to a separate measure in the interest of a deal.
__________________
Hospitality consists of a little fire, a little food, and an immense quiet. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06/25/08, 08:55 AM
whiterabbit454's Avatar
Cracked Nut
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Owen County Kentucky
Posts: 421
i dont know about that artical but i do know that if i had the money and the chance to add on to what i have i would do it good luck with your search!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06/25/08, 09:04 AM
mnn2501's Avatar
Dallas
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: N of Dallas, TX
Posts: 10,122
This is about people who already bought too much house and never read the fine print of their loans getting bailed out by the rest of us taxpayers (we are the government). It appears from THIS article that they will be taking some money that is usually reserved for first-time home buyer programs and giving it to these irresponsible people instead. Thus hurting people who would usually be eligable for first time home buyer programs.
While its true that greedy lenders made these loans, it was irresponsible (or ignorant) buyers that wanted houses they could not afford and accepted these bad loans from them.

Last edited by mnn2501; 06/25/08 at 09:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06/25/08, 10:39 AM
In Remembrance
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: River Valley, Arkansas
Posts: 847
If you can afford to buy and PAY FOR a home then you will be able to do it with out my help (taxes). If you can't then you don't deserve to buy a house PERIOD. End of problem and crisis.

This is to help out people who overbought homes and are now crying that they cannot afford them. Answer sell the home your in and buy what you can afford.

Also anyone who bought with an adjustable mortgage cause that was all they could get should have realized they really couldn't afford to own that house and backed out.

Having ranted I'll now get off my soap box and suggest to you to buy what you can afford, stay away from "easy Money" and be assured you can afford your home.

The government, IE: you and I, are NOT here to help YOU they are helping big mortgage business with this type of Bills and laws.

Good luck in your search.
__________________
"When you have a freedom, Thank a Soldier"
"When you lose a freedom, Thank a Lawyer"
"When you read this, Thank a Teacher"

Last edited by Siryet; 06/25/08 at 01:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06/25/08, 11:11 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South Texas
Posts: 948
Not an attorney but from everything I have read, this will only help you if you already have a loan and are already about to lose your home. If you are in the market to buy, the only way it may help you is if you purchase property that has been forclosed on. Nothing has passed yet so who knows what the finaly product will be. But, for those of us who are paying our payments and not losing our home, nothing in it for us but higher taxes. For those of us wanting to sell our home, nothing for us unless we first let it go into forclosure. Those hurt by this are the ones who want to buy but can't get the money because all the loans are going to those who meet this criteria (in default). Also hurt, those with homes for sale that are not being purchased because the buyer bought a forclosed home instead, to get the credits etc.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06/25/08, 12:28 PM
We're gettin' there!
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NW TN
Posts: 938
Thank you everyone. I understand now. And we are only looking at houses/property that are in the "super cheap" category because we want as small a mortgage as possible....we don't need much. Just a few acres. I'm just scared to buy anything right now with any kind of government money. I'm seriously thinking we just put off our plans for a few years and just save up the money and buy cash. 'Course on the flip side of that, that means we waste another few years in rent payments. Decisions, decisions......
__________________
Hospitality consists of a little fire, a little food, and an immense quiet. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06/25/08, 12:49 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: West Central Indiana
Posts: 290
With how tight the banks are abou credit now, take all the federal programs you can get, they will make no difference to someone like you. As a matter of fact, the programs you are considering, were originally made just for you, to help out first time buyers.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06/26/08, 12:41 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,510
Translation?

The government is taking your money and giving to to someone else.

Translation complete.
__________________
Respect The Cactus!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06/26/08, 01:48 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quint View Post
Translation?

The government is taking your money and giving to to someone else.

Translation complete.
Exactly. Thank You. Just another form of welfare.
Tom
__________________
Tom Lavalette, Garden Farmer
Owner Toms Tractors, Buy, Sell, Trade Garden Tractors and Implements. Custom Built machinery by order.


If Farms were Smaller, Communities would be Closer.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06/26/08, 11:27 AM
texican's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carthage, Texas
Posts: 12,261
If you can buy, buy. I wouldn't expect anything from the govt.... if it happens, well fine and good... but I wouldn't depend on the tax breaks.

The bill is sending the wrong message. If you want to encourage something, you give tax breaks... if you want to discourage something, you tax it. The bill is rewarding bad behavior... So, our pols are saying its ok to do bad things. They should be taxing (by not rewarding) the folks that should never have taken out loans in the first place. Like Ed McMann...I wonder if he'll get to keep his mansion now?

Where can I sign up for a bad loan, so I can default, and get a sweetheart loan?

And it hasn't been signed... Maybe the Prez will veto this (o)abomination....
__________________
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. Seneca
Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival. W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06/27/08, 07:17 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,724
Check out the USDA Rural Developement loans. 1-6% interest depending on income. A lady friend of ours just got one last year and only 1% interest and she works admissions in a hospital. It's a super deal if you qualify. In MN they also have septic loans you don't have to pay off till you sell the place or 30 years whatever comes first for low income earners. .
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 AM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture