Top 200 Rural Places to Live... - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Homesteading Questions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 06/05/06, 12:42 PM
Brighid1971's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 337
Top 200 Rural Places to Live...

I saw the first results of 2005's poll on the website of 'Progressive Farmer' last year. Apparently I missed this years results, but not much has changed.

http://www.pfbestplaces.com/default....ay&Rank=Top200

We were actually looking in the Ontario County area last fall--it is BEAUTIFUL! Anyone read this poll (or even this magazine?)
__________________
You can say any foolish thing to a dog and the dog will give you a look
that says "My God you're right! I never would've thought of that!"
-- Sean Connery --

Last edited by Brighid1971; 06/05/06 at 11:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06/05/06, 01:12 PM
garden guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: AR (ozarks)
Posts: 3,516
Funny I wonder how they arrived at those places they definitely did not choose using my most important criteria heck taxachussets was pretty high on the list. As were a lot of places that have building codes.
__________________
marching to the beat of a different drummer
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06/05/06, 01:23 PM
turtlehead's Avatar  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central WV
Posts: 5,390
Income appears to be one of the criteria. West Virginia didn't make the list at all. It looks like a top 200 list for yuppie rural dwellers.
__________________
Our homestead-in-the-making: Palazzo Rospo
Eating the dream
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06/05/06, 01:24 PM
Brighid1971's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 337
Quote:
Originally Posted by turtlehead
Income appears to be one of the criteria. West Virginia didn't make the list at all. It looks like a top 200 list for yuppie rural dwellers.
Ah, makes sense...and goodness knows we are far from being yuppies
__________________
You can say any foolish thing to a dog and the dog will give you a look
that says "My God you're right! I never would've thought of that!"
-- Sean Connery --
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06/05/06, 01:26 PM
turtlehead's Avatar  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central WV
Posts: 5,390
Looks like percentage of high-schoolers that go to college is another criteria. Unfortunately, WV fails miserably in that category too.

I found it to be an interesting poll, nonetheless.
__________________
Our homestead-in-the-making: Palazzo Rospo
Eating the dream
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06/05/06, 01:30 PM
garden guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: AR (ozarks)
Posts: 3,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by turtlehead
Income appears to be one of the criteria. West Virginia didn't make the list at all. It looks like a top 200 list for yuppie rural dwellers.
Agreed I bet the people there are the majority of the modern day other earth news subscribers
__________________
marching to the beat of a different drummer
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06/05/06, 01:37 PM
FourDeuce's Avatar
Five of Seven
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Arkansas Ozarks
Posts: 3,048
I subscribe to Mother Earth News

I have just about every issue of Mother Earth News from the beginning to today, and I still receive it. Not everything in there is "yuppiefied". There is some good information in there. A few years ago they even did an article on firearms(which upset quite a few of the readers and caused some of them to cancel their subscriptions to the magazine in protest ).
__________________
"I don't want everyone to like me; I should think less of myself if some people did."
— Henry James
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06/05/06, 01:38 PM
garden guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: AR (ozarks)
Posts: 3,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by turtlehead
Income appears to be one of the criteria. West Virginia didn't make the list at all. It looks like a top 200 list for yuppie rural dwellers.
Agreed I bet the people there are the majority of the modern day other earth news subscribers
__________________
marching to the beat of a different drummer
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06/05/06, 01:39 PM
wy_white_wolf's Avatar
Just howling at the moon
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 5,530
Yuppie living list

There was a link to how they compiled the list.

Quote:
...Counties in the overall top 10 and the regional top 20 lists are ranked first according to cost of living (the ratio of average household income to average household spending). Then we created a formula that takes into account crime rates, air quality, access to health care (the number of medical resources per thousand people), education (student/teacher ratios and college-bound percentages) and leisure activities (restaurants, museums, parks, golf courses, etc....
Doesn't appear they took into any considerations I'd be interested in.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06/05/06, 01:40 PM
A.T. Hagan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Other than Flagler county this list seems to have overlooked North Florida altogether for which I am grateful.

.....Alan.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06/05/06, 01:45 PM
Lizza's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,783
Florence, Oregon appeared as the top place to retire on some lists and books (we are about 45 min. away). In a matter of years prices went from finding something for $50,000-$75,000 (smallish just normal house on a city lot) to not being able to find something under $250,000 that was habitable. I wish we would have been smarter and bought up some places (alas we were not).
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06/05/06, 01:55 PM
Perpetually curious!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North Central Michigan
Posts: 2,747
Definitely yuppie kingdoms. For all of the Michigan ones in the top 100 you need to have a LOT of money (and patience to deal with lots of zoning codes) to even think about buying there. The only reasonably priced one was the first one mentioned (midland county) where we just moved from due to expanding crime and the county rapidly disappearing to sprawl. Even that one was out of our financial reach.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06/05/06, 02:32 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by morningstar
Florence, Oregon appeared as the top place to retire on some lists and books (we are about 45 min. away). In a matter of years prices went from finding something for $50,000-$75,000 (smallish just normal house on a city lot) to not being able to find something under $250,000 that was habitable. I wish we would have been smarter and bought up some places (alas we were not).

Florence is where I was born, and partly raised -- the other part was in Alaska. My family has lived in that area since the 1870's, and a few family members still do. It's one of the most beautiful places in the whole country, IMO, but I sure couldn't afford to go back there to live.

Kathleen
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06/05/06, 03:52 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: CHINA
Posts: 9,569
#49 Lincoln County Maine.....prices are too high and lots too small

Alot of family lives there and my parents have since moved....too many yuppies moving in and wanting too many city type services.....meaning a huge tax burden

Cant wait to move to an unorganized area....CHEAP taxes!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06/05/06, 04:52 PM
icehorse1's Avatar  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nogal. Lincoln County, NM
Posts: 6
Whew, glad our Lincoln County, New Mexico didn't make the list! Our secret is still preserved. Sante Fe County, NM??? Who are they trying to kid???
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06/05/06, 05:04 PM
Rock On
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: upstate , ny
Posts: 166
Yuppies..lol

I guess i kinda doubt many yuppies would be intrested in upstate ny. Esp the county's listed. The counties near NYC are the exception. As a whole upstate ny isn't exactly a mecca of jobs and urban sprawl. The industry based cities are struggling b/c of high taxes and an abundance of houses.

Yuppies might try connecticut
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06/05/06, 08:24 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,069
That is one strange list. The Pa. listings vary from farming counties with strong farming communities, to a county that is one of the fastest growing in the nation, over-run by NYC transplants, has soaring land costs, out of control taxes and a wage level that is based largely on commuters that sit in cube farms in the NYC area and couldn't plow a field if they had to. It makes one thing clear, statistics alone are a meaningless tool to evaluate many things.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06/05/06, 08:41 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 171
Yeah, how did Pike County PA make the list?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06/05/06, 08:43 PM
heather's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2002
Location: western PA
Posts: 3,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by turtlehead
It looks like a top 200 list for yuppie rural dwellers.
agreed

Centre County, Pennsylvania? - you've got to be kidding
Beautiful (except for the sprawl) and expensive

New York's taxes are too high for my liking

Looked at New Hampshire a few years ago & decided we weren't fans

interesting list
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06/05/06, 08:45 PM
heather's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2002
Location: western PA
Posts: 3,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedfunk
I guess i kinda doubt many yuppies would be intrested in upstate ny. Esp the county's listed. The counties near NYC are the exception.
Upstate NY is FILLED with SECOND homes for "yuckies" from the city

Summer time & hunting season are nightmare times for locals

I grew up there
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 AM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture