Thoreau's Walden

[Tlduker]

I am currently reading Walden. To me some of it seems anti-traditional and radically (an unhealthy radicalism) independent. I do agree with his beliefs on the distinction of human necessity and the fulfilling of our passions and beautiful simplicity. I have enjoyed most of it, and have clutched my jaws at other points throughout the book. For those who have read it, what is your impression of it?

[Peacock]

Hoo boy, it's been a long time since I read Walden. From what I recall, the main point was following your own personal drummer, not society's, so I can understand why this would appeal to members of this board.

You have to understand Walden in its historical context. In 1854, when Walden was published, Thoreau's transcendentalist views weren't *that* radical, at least not compared to some of the other rather unique religious and social sects that came about during that era, say, 1850 through 1900 or so. It was a time of great social reformation and really, the beginning of higher education for the average citizen.

It's an echo of the humanism that came about during the Renaissance era at the end of the 14th century. The Renaissance was an escape from the Dark Ages, Thoreau's philosophies were an escape from the Industrial Revolution. Both were ideas that glorified personal happiness instead of life as a cog in a machine. From that point of view, maybe it isn't anti-traditional and radical enough!

Maybe this should be moved to the book review forum?