1495Likes
 |
|

06/03/15, 11:59 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: True Northern California
Posts: 13,456
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmericanStand
From time to time the government prosecuted a bunch of fraud cases at once.
I think that's what my friend was caught up in.
It makes good TV "29 welfare Queens convicted of fraud" and it's supposed to help scare others into obeying. But it destroys lives for political gain and it makes people think that they could be convicting 28 people everyday.
|
Heaven forbid that people committing fraud should have their lives ruined.
__________________
For we used to ask when we were little, thinking that the old men knew all things which are on earth: yet forsooth they did not know; but we do not contradict them, for neither do we know.
|

06/03/15, 12:12 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,722
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by where I want to
Heaven forbid that people committing fraud should have their lives ruined.
|
I think you are missing the point , if my friends case was typical the government manufactured the fraud. She did not set out to defraud the government.
|

06/03/15, 12:15 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: True Northern California
Posts: 13,456
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmericanStand
I think you are missing the point , if my friends case was typical the government manufactured the fraud. She did not set out to defraud the government.
|
Ri-i-ight. Fraud by definition includes proving intent.
__________________
For we used to ask when we were little, thinking that the old men knew all things which are on earth: yet forsooth they did not know; but we do not contradict them, for neither do we know.
|

06/03/15, 12:22 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: W Mo
Posts: 9,269
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmoetc
According to the GAO fraud in the SNAP programs runs about 4% . Something needs to be done and done now about this rampant abuse! Now that national security is solved I urge the congress to turn their attention here. But please don't touch medicare and Medicaid where fraud runs 10% . http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/12/19...html?referrer=
|
I bet the GAO defines "fraud" a bit differently than you or I would. If SNAP is issued to person A and they sell it to person B for cents on the dollar and get caught, that's their 4% fraud. Or a grocer charges the SNAP card and gives the person back cash, that's probably in their fraud detection.
But there are all kinds of other fraud they will never catch, or never act on. Such as, the person doesn't really need the benefit and they show this by buying luxury items with it, eating like a wealthy person on the taxpayer's dime. That's fraud to me, but I bet it doesn't show up on GAO's radar. I bet you could buy steak and lobster every month when the bennies recharge and no one would ever say boo.
Then there is the person has a live in boyfriend/girlfriend with income that wasn't reported on the SNAP application. I know a waste of oxygen who pulled that off for years, her SO was an auto worker and made good money but she still milked all her benefits. (Yes, it was reported, no, nothing was done.)
My DSIL used to work for a discount retailer, and she had a few "regulars" who would come in and buy expensive baby formula when their bennies renewed, then return it for a cash refund the next day. Apparently you can't put credit back on the SNAP card. So that's how these SNAP recipients turned them into drinkin' money. And baby formula could not be re-stocked, it had to be discarded. So the store lost money as well as the taxpayers. And what could you really do about it? Refuse to sell someone formula? Refuse a return with a valid receipt?
And then there was the well publicized million dollar lottery winner who kept on taking SNAP benefits.
The whole program has gone out of control. That 4% fraud rate is a joke.
__________________
It is still best to be honest and truthful; to make the most of what we have; to be happy with the simple pleasures and to be cheerful and have courage when things go wrong.
Laura Ingalls Wilder
|

06/03/15, 12:36 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: True Northern California
Posts: 13,456
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MO_cows
I bet the GAO defines "fraud" a bit differently than you or I would. If SNAP is issued to person A and they sell it to person B for cents on the dollar and get caught, that's their 4% fraud. Or a grocer charges the SNAP card and gives the person back cash, that's probably in their fraud detection.
But there are all kinds of other fraud they will never catch, or never act on. Such as, the person doesn't really need the benefit and they show this by buying luxury items with it, eating like a wealthy person on the taxpayer's dime. That's fraud to me, but I bet it doesn't show up on GAO's radar. I bet you could buy steak and lobster every month when the bennies recharge and no one would ever say boo.
Then there is the person has a live in boyfriend/girlfriend with income that wasn't reported on the SNAP application. I know a waste of oxygen who pulled that off for years, her SO was an auto worker and made good money but she still milked all her benefits. (Yes, it was reported, no, nothing was done.)
My DSIL used to work for a discount retailer, and she had a few "regulars" who would come in and buy expensive baby formula when their bennies renewed, then return it for a cash refund the next day. Apparently you can't put credit back on the SNAP card. So that's how these SNAP recipients turned them into drinkin' money. And baby formula could not be re-stocked, it had to be discarded. So the store lost money as well as the taxpayers. And what could you really do about it? Refuse to sell someone formula? Refuse a return with a valid receipt?
And then there was the well publicized million dollar lottery winner who kept on taking SNAP benefits.
The whole program has gone out of control. That 4% fraud rate is a joke.
|
Fraud is difficult to prove because it requires proving intent. On an individual level that is much harder than proving it in an organized business like way.
The way the fraud is done when organized is pretty clear but if an indivual just fails to report income, well, they just misunderstood, didn't they- no intent at all.
__________________
For we used to ask when we were little, thinking that the old men knew all things which are on earth: yet forsooth they did not know; but we do not contradict them, for neither do we know.
|

06/03/15, 12:46 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Alaska- Kenai Pen- Kasilof
Posts: 9,336
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmericanStand
I think you are missing the point , if my friends case was typical the government manufactured the fraud. She did not set out to defraud the government.
|
Limited information was given by you.... one sided... it was vetted and you claim she just caved... lack of information turns it into a moot point. I understand that you may know more. Did you personally help your friend at the time?
__________________
basketti
This is really too dumb to respond to, but okay
|

06/03/15, 12:48 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Alaska- Kenai Pen- Kasilof
Posts: 9,336
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by where I want to
Fraud is difficult to prove because it requires proving intent. On an individual level that is much harder than proving it in an organized business like way.
The way the fraud is done when organized is pretty clear but if an indivual just fails to report income, well, they just misunderstood, didn't they- no intent at all.
|
Fyi you can as a clerk I did this... it is a pain in the butt and it takes a few days to return to the card..
__________________
basketti
This is really too dumb to respond to, but okay
Last edited by kasilofhome; 06/03/15 at 02:49 PM.
|

06/03/15, 12:50 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: True Northern California
Posts: 13,456
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kasilofhome
Fyi you can as a cleric I did this... it is a pain in the butt and it takes a few days to return to the card..
|
??????? Don't understand.
__________________
For we used to ask when we were little, thinking that the old men knew all things which are on earth: yet forsooth they did not know; but we do not contradict them, for neither do we know.
|

06/03/15, 12:54 PM
|
|
Sock puppet reinstated
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 6,553
|
|
|
That is right, complain, complain , complain and then complain again when it is suggested you should be part of the solution.
__________________
IMO, yes my opinion.
|

06/03/15, 02:22 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,722
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kasilofhome
Limited information was given by you.... one sided... it was vetted and you claim she just caved... lack of information turns it into a moot point. I understand that you may know more. Did you personally help your friend at the time?
|
I am close friends with the husband.
Filling out a application isn't fraud , that's why you have applications to see if someone qualifies.
Lying on the application would be. But they didn't and never were accused of it.
|

06/03/15, 02:29 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: True Northern California
Posts: 13,456
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmericanStand
I am close friends with the husband.
Filling out a application isn't fraud , that's why you have applications to see if someone qualifies.
Lying on the application would be. But they didn't and never were accused of it.
|
Ri-i-ight. I doubt filling out an application is the whole story. Might be fraud because the applications gave requirement that needed to be reported that they subsequently didn't. That is the most common fraud- not reporting .
__________________
For we used to ask when we were little, thinking that the old men knew all things which are on earth: yet forsooth they did not know; but we do not contradict them, for neither do we know.
|

06/03/15, 02:51 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Alaska- Kenai Pen- Kasilof
Posts: 9,336
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmericanStand
I am close friends with the husband.
Filling out a application isn't fraud , that's why you have applications to see if someone qualifies.
Lying on the application would be. But they didn't and never were accused of it.
|
It certainly can be... false info....
__________________
basketti
This is really too dumb to respond to, but okay
|

06/03/15, 02:57 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Alaska- Kenai Pen- Kasilof
Posts: 9,336
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by where I want to
??????? Don't understand.
|
It should have been attached to Mo. Who stated refunding baby formula for cash refunds to the snap card are what is to be done there is a way....it takes a few minutes and the snap card has the money value add back in a few days... people complain but that is life refunds to credit cards and debit cards take a few day that's life even for those on snap. And this should be how all snap cards are done notice of this was a fed doc. At fred meyers cashiers had to sign that they understood not cash refunds for snap and that they were trained to preform the properrefunding to the snap card.
__________________
basketti
This is really too dumb to respond to, but okay
|

06/03/15, 03:01 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: True Northern California
Posts: 13,456
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kasilofhome
It should have been attached to Mo. Who stated refunding baby formula for cash refunds to the snap card are what is to be done there is a way....it takes a few minutes and the snap card has the money value add back in a few days... people complain but that is life refunds to credit cards and debit cards take a few day that's life even for those on snap. And this should be how all snap cards are done notice of this was a fed doc. At fred meyers cashiers had to sign that they understood not cash refunds for snap and that they were trained to preform the properrefunding to the snap card.
|
Thanks I simple couldn't figure out what you were saying.
__________________
For we used to ask when we were little, thinking that the old men knew all things which are on earth: yet forsooth they did not know; but we do not contradict them, for neither do we know.
|

06/03/15, 03:06 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ca
Posts: 6,193
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevada
Octomom was charged criminally, and was convicted (no contest plea).
|
Didn't she flaunt that fact all over the media? They had no choice because she made the government look bad, they had to respond.
__________________
"If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun" - President Obama June 14, 2008
|

06/03/15, 03:10 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ca
Posts: 6,193
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MO_cows
I bet the GAO defines "fraud" a bit differently than you or I would. If SNAP is issued to person A and they sell it to person B for cents on the dollar and get caught, that's their 4% fraud. Or a grocer charges the SNAP card and gives the person back cash, that's probably in their fraud detection.
But there are all kinds of other fraud they will never catch, or never act on. Such as, the person doesn't really need the benefit and they show this by buying luxury items with it, eating like a wealthy person on the taxpayer's dime. That's fraud to me, but I bet it doesn't show up on GAO's radar. I bet you could buy steak and lobster every month when the bennies recharge and no one would ever say boo.
Then there is the person has a live in boyfriend/girlfriend with income that wasn't reported on the SNAP application. I know a waste of oxygen who pulled that off for years, her SO was an auto worker and made good money but she still milked all her benefits. (Yes, it was reported, no, nothing was done.)
My DSIL used to work for a discount retailer, and she had a few "regulars" who would come in and buy expensive baby formula when their bennies renewed, then return it for a cash refund the next day. Apparently you can't put credit back on the SNAP card. So that's how these SNAP recipients turned them into drinkin' money. And baby formula could not be re-stocked, it had to be discarded. So the store lost money as well as the taxpayers. And what could you really do about it? Refuse to sell someone formula? Refuse a return with a valid receipt?
And then there was the well publicized million dollar lottery winner who kept on taking SNAP benefits.
The whole program has gone out of control. That 4% fraud rate is a joke.
|
There was some surfer dude that lived in Venice California who was on the news because he would make a couple of hundred bucks panhandling on the boardwalk, and use his snap benefits to buy lobster and crab. These types of incidents are far more common than were led to believe.
__________________
"If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun" - President Obama June 14, 2008
|

06/03/15, 03:18 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: W Mo
Posts: 9,269
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffreyD
There was some surfer dude that lived in Venice California who was on the news because he would make a couple of hundred bucks panhandling on the boardwalk, and use his snap benefits to buy lobster and crab. These types of incidents are far more common than were led to believe.
|
I think I saw that on 60 minutes or one of those type shows. He would throw a party and feed his friends that high dollar food once a month or something. Made me want to start a "shark welfare" program and feed him to a great white. Sharks gotta eat too.
__________________
It is still best to be honest and truthful; to make the most of what we have; to be happy with the simple pleasures and to be cheerful and have courage when things go wrong.
Laura Ingalls Wilder
|

06/03/15, 03:26 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Watertown, Tn.
Posts: 2,152
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmericanStand
Do you have any proof about this ?
I don't think the admin would be responceable for investigating snap abuse.
I have a good friend who was investigated by the FBI for food stamp fraud. She was intimidated into pleading guilty to attempting to defraud the government.
She was turned in by her social worker , the evidence was her statements on her application. Apparently according to the statements she made she didn't qualify for them. But rather than turn her down they gave them to her for a year then prosecuted her for fraud.
I guess she was supposed to be a expert on the program.
Interestingly her husband who signed the same form and was also investigated told the FBI to buzz off and was never even served papers.
|
That does not make sense. No way that would stand up in court.
|

06/03/15, 03:30 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Watertown, Tn.
Posts: 2,152
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffreyD
Didn't she flaunt that fact all over the media? They had no choice because she made the government look bad, they had to respond.
|
The government looks bad without any one's help!
|

06/03/15, 06:16 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N. E. TX
Posts: 29,592
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmericanStand
Do you have any proof about this ?
I don't think the admin would be responceable for investigating snap abuse.
I have a good friend who was investigated by the FBI for food stamp fraud. She was intimidated into pleading guilty to attempting to defraud the government.
She was turned in by her social worker , the evidence was her statements on her application. Apparently according to the statements she made she didn't qualify for them. But rather than turn her down they gave them to her for a year then prosecuted her for fraud.
I guess she was supposed to be a expert on the program.
Interestingly her husband who signed the same form and was also investigated told the FBI to buzz off and was never even served papers.
|
So who does the social worker work for? Would that be GE? Maybe microsoft...I was under the impression this administration included fed workers. All of 'em. People who work for the state...Any gov't worker. ICE.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Rate This Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 PM.
|
|